Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 1 Lausanne – measurements with Guillaume Thérin LPNHE – Paris Lausanne BaBar Measurements of detector at SLAC with
2
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 2 Lausanne – measurements with Theoretical context –CP violation –Standard model PEPII and BaBar B-Factory Direct measurements of –B - D ( * ) K ( * )- method (ADS, GLW, GGSZ) Direct measurements of sin(2 ) –B 0 D ( * )- +, D ( * )- +, B 0 D ( * )0 K ( * )0 Combinations of the results with CKMFitter Outline
3
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 3 Lausanne – measurements with Theoretical context
4
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 4 Lausanne – measurements with The CKM matrix elements V ij describe the electroweak coupling strength of the W to quarks The CKM mechanism introduces quark flavour mixing CP violation in the Standard Model The phase changes sign under CP. Transition amplitude violates CP if V ub ≠ V ub *, i.e. if V ub has a non-zero phase = CP Complex phases in V ij are the origin of SM CP violation
5
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 5 Lausanne – measurements with Structure of the CKM matrix –Mixing is weak Magnitude of elements strongly ranked (leading to ~diagonal form) 3 particle generations and unitary CKM matrix: 4 parameters (3 real + 1 im.) = arg( V* ub / V cb ) (Wolf.) Unitarity Triangle /3/3 /2/2 /1/1 V td V tb * V ud V ub * V cd V cb * ( ) V cd V cb * Wolfenstein : Measuring SM CP violation Measure complex phase of CKM elements 3 real par. A, λ (= sin Cabibbo = 0.22) and ρ 1 imaginary par. iη (responsable of CP violation) ( )( )
6
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 6 Lausanne – measurements with http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr CP violation studies established: Experimental Constraints on the Unitarity Triangle Before the B-factories, constraints came from kaons, B oscillations and |Vub/Vcb| B-factories can be used to over-constrain the triangle and so to test the SM sin(2 ) = 0.685 ± 0.032 experimental contraints on (this talk) harder to measure The SM test consists of comparing 2 kinds of measurements : P (new physics) B decays in charmless 2-bodies (envolving amplitudes with penguins) charmonium b cus,b ucs b cud,b ucd b cus,b ucs st (Standard Model), B - D ( * ) K ( * )- (GLW, ADS, GGSZ) B 0 D ( * ) , D 0 K ( * )0 ( or sin(2 )) B s D s K ( * )0 (probably at LHC)
7
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 7 Lausanne – measurements with PEPII / BaBar, Experimental apparatus
8
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 8 Lausanne – measurements with 3.1 GeV 9 GeV The PEP-II B factory - Specifications BB threshold (4S) Produces B 0 B 0 and B + B - pairs via Y(4s) resonance (10.58 GeV) Asymmetric beam energies Low energy beam 3.1 GeV High energy beam 9.0 GeV Clean environment ~28% of all hadronic interactions are BB
9
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 9 Lausanne – measurements with RUN1 RUN2 RUN5 RUN3 Most analyses are based on 232.10 6 BB pairs RUN4 Trickle injection: w/o trickle injection top-off every 30-40 min continuous filling with trickle injection more stable machine, +35% more lumi The PEP-II B factory - Performance PEP-II top lumi: 1.x10 34 cm -2 s -1 (~10 BB pairs per second) Integrated luminosity PEP-II delivered: 311 fb -1 BaBar recorded: 299 fb -1 on- peak+off-peak data Most analyses use 211fb -1 of on- peak data Records:
10
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 10 Lausanne – measurements with B A B AR Collaboration : 11 countries and ~590 physicists ! Solenoid : 1.5T ElectroMagnetic Calorimeter : 6580 CsI crystals (Tl) E)/E = (2.32 E –1/4 1.85)% Support tube Instrumented Flux Return : iron / RPCs [ → LSTs ] The BaBar detector Drift CHamber : 40 layers (p T )/p T = (0.13 p T 0.45)% Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light : 144 quartz bars, 11000 PMs K/ > 2.5 (p < 4.3 GeV/c) Silicon Vertex Tracker : 5 layers of double-sided Silicium, vertex resolution of 60-120 m
11
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 11 Lausanne – measurements with Selecting B events for CP analysis B mesons identification m ES EE e + (3.1 GeV) e - (9 GeV) b udsc Signal isotropic E* beam very well known e + e - → uu, dd, ss, cc e + e - → bb -2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 Fisher discrimnant E* beam = E* Υ(4S) / 2 K/ separation with Cherenkov angle Excellent separation between 1.5 and 4 GeV/c Combinatorial e + e - qq bkg suppression Jet-like E* beam 2 m B > ~
12
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 12 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining with B - D ( * ) K ( * )- decays Gronau-London-Wyler method Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan method Combination Introduction
13
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 13 Lausanne – measurements with B-B- b u c u s u D0D0 K *- V cb V us Constraining with B ± → D ( * ) K ( * )± decays a a r B e i( ) B-B- b u s u u c D0D0 K *- V ub = arg( V* ub / V cb ) Favored decay b c Strong phase CKM Angle Suppressed decay b u Ratio of the 2 amplitudes r B ≈ 0.1-0.2 D 0, D 0 same f interference sensitive to : ff –Gronau-London-Wyler : CP eigenstates –Atwood-Dunietz-Soni : DCSD D 0 and CA D 0 ex. : B - → (K + - ) D K - Ks0Ks0 KsKs K+K-K+K- ++ KsKs –Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan : D 0 → K s K+-K+- Ks-Ks- r D / r B ≈ 0.5 B(B - D ( * ) K ( * )- ) 5. 10 -4 ! r B, , different for DK* ±, DK ± and D*K ± modes
14
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 14 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining with B - D ( * ) K ( * )- decays Introduction Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan method Combination Gronau-London-Wyler method
15
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 15 Lausanne – measurements with GLW - Observables of the method - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) A(B+→D CP K *- ) A(B- →D CP K *+ ) A ( B →D 0 K* ) Observables are: non-CP modes ≈ flavour eigenstates N(B + → D K* + ) ≠ N(B - → D K* - ) Direct CP violation:
16
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 16 Lausanne – measurements with A + R + = - A - R - Extract the 3 unknowns ( , r B, ( * ) B ) for each mode from 4 observables a relation between observables: 8-fold ambiguity in Sensitivity on depends on r B D ( * ) K modes suffer from bkg from D ( * )0 (12x higher BF) need excellent /K separation D ( * ) K* modes cleaner but lower BF and lower efficiency need to consider D ( * ) K s irreductible component Need to take into account dilution effect from opposite-sign CP D 0 decays in fK S 0 and K S 0 (for instance D 0 a 0 K S 0 ) D*K* need angular analysis -not realistic with current statistics GLW - Characteristics of the method - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) Experience: Theory:
17
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 17 Lausanne – measurements with Event Shape Variables cos( of B momentum m ES & E mass (D 0 ) D 0 helicity D0D0 BB mass (K S 0 ) distance of flight mass (K*) K* helicity K* Ks0Ks0 232 millions of charged B decays Reconstructed BF of the order of 2.10 -7 – 10 -6 CP=+1 : K K , , non-CP : K , K 0 , K 3 D0D0 track PIDs CP+, non-CP mass (K S 0 ) distance of flight CP- : K s 0 X. X = { } Ks0Ks0 mass ( ) helicity dalitz angle track PIDs mass ( 0 ) 00 mass ( ) helicity track PIDs GLW – Reconstruction and selection - B ± D K ± * -- -- ++
18
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 18 Lausanne – measurements with CP+ : 24 CP- : 25 B+B-B+B- B0B0B0B0 cc uds Signal Adding CP+ modes together (resp. CP- and non- CP) Strategy : fit in one dimension in m es Use data in E and D 0 mass sidebands to fix the background shape Hypothesis : common parameterisation for all modes (checked on MC) D 0 mass EE m es Gaussian G (r B = 0) Argus function A m es GLW – Distribution of the simulation and fit strategy - B ± D K ± *
19
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 19 Lausanne – measurements with GLW - Results of the fit for 232 millions of charged B - B ± D K ± * m(D 0 ) sidebands E sidebands B+ non-CPCP+1 CP-1 SIGNAL REGION B- One single Gaussian G One single Argus A Simultaneous fit in m es for 3 regions : –Signal –m D0 sidebands – E sidebands PRD72,71103(2005)
20
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 20 Lausanne – measurements with B D 0 K: 232M B ± decays, D 0 KK, K S 0 0 A 2 cut on C in these plots B D* 0 K: 123 B ± decays, only D* 0 D 0 0, D 0 KK, at the moment: Main background from kinematically similar B→D 0 which has BF 12x larger –So the signal and this main background are fitted together Kaon hypothesis GLW - Results - B ± D ( * ) K ± Only CP+ modes 3D Fit(m es, E, C ) without the kaon hypothesis 2D fit to E and the Cherenkov angle of the prompt track
21
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 21 Lausanne – measurements with GLW – Summary - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) No asymmetry seen All values compatible with 1 except for the DK* mode r B is bigger than expected for this mode 1 0
22
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 22 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining with B - D ( * ) K ( * )- decays Introduction Gronau-London-Wyler method Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan method Combination Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method
23
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 23 Lausanne – measurements with ADS - Method - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) B-B- b u c u s u D0D0 K *- B-B- b u u c D0D0 Cabibbo favoured b c amplitude Cabibbo suppressed b u amplitude s u s u u d u d u s r B = Cabibbo suppressed c d amplitude Cabibbo favoured s u amplitude r D = r D = 0.060±0.003 Sensitivity: r D / r B ≈ 0.5 Better sensitivity than GLW but lower BF 4-fold ambiguity in : need to measure at least two D decay modes to loose ambiguity between and the strong phase
24
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 24 Lausanne – measurements with m ES (GeV/c²) ~90 events ~4 events RS WS WS B + WS B - Cut same variables as GLW Some of them are put in a neural network ADS – Results of the fit - B ± [K ± ] D K ±( * ) ± B ± [K ± ] D K* ± ± B ± [K ± ] D K* ± ± B - [K + - ] D K* - B + [K - + ] D K* - PRD72,71104(2005)
25
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 25 Lausanne – measurements with 1-CL GLW ADS combination rBrB [0, ] & ( D + ) [0,2 ] (deg) 1-CL (semi-log scale) [75°,105°] (excluded @2 CL) GLW + ADS – Interpretation - B ± D K ± * EPJ,C41,1 (2005) CkmFitter Frequentist approach to determine and r B Construction of Confidence Level plots PRD72,71104(2005)
26
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 26 Lausanne – measurements with hep-ex/0504047 B - →D*[D 0 ]K - B - →D*[D ]K - B - →DK - D*→D 0 /D ≠ in D* by (r* B )²< (0.16)² * (Bayesian r* B ²>0 & uniform, and D *) PRD70,091503(2004) 0< D <2 r D ±1 51°< <66° r B <0.23* * * * * ADS – Results - B ± [K ± ] D(*) K ± ±
27
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 27 Lausanne – measurements with ADS – Summary - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) No signal peak was observed More sensitive than GLW but need more statistics to constrain Other non-CP modes to add and reduce ambiguities 0
28
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 28 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining with B - D ( * ) K ( * )- decays Introduction Gronau-London-Wyler method Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method Combination Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan method
29
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 29 Lausanne – measurements with Schematic view of the interference Reconstruct B D (*)0 K (*) with Cabibbo-allowed D 0 /D 0 K S If D 0 /D 0 Dalitz f(m + 2,m - 2 ) is known (included charm phase shift D ): B:B+:B:B+: |M | 2 = ambiguity only 2-fold ( ↔ ) Experimentally: BF [(B D 0 K )(D 0 K 0 )]=(2.2 0.4)10 -5 High statistic Only charged tracks in final state high efficiency/low bkg GGSZ – Dalitz Method - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * )
30
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 30 Lausanne – measurements with f(m 2 +,m 2 - ) extracted from high statistics tagged D 0 events (from D * ) D decay model described by coherent sum of Breit-Wigner amplitudes D phase difference determined by model Not so good for s-wave. Need controversial and ’(1000) to reasonably describe the data Masses and widths fixed to PDG2004 values except for and ’ (fitted) 13 fitted resonances + NR term + + ’ 2 /dof 3824/3022=1.27 DCS K*(892) CA K*(892) (770) GGSZ – D 0 K S Dalitz model f - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * )
31
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 31 Lausanne – measurements with Mode Signal events B - DK − 282 ± 20 90 ± 11 B - D*[D ]K − 44 ± 8 B - DK* − [K 0 S - ] 42 ± 8 B - D*[D 0 ] K − DK - D*[D 0 ]K - D*[D ]K - hep-ex/0504039 (m ES >5.27 GeV/c²) B - DK* − [K 0 S - ] GGSZ – Fit results - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * )
32
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 32 Lausanne – measurements with (deg) k. rs B 0<k<1 is an extra parameter with no assumption made on (K 0 S - ) under the K*- part 2 CL 1 CL GLW+ADS 11 11 22 GGSZ/GLW+ADS – Confidence regions - B ± D K ± * (deg) GGSZ rBrB More constraint with GLW/ADS for this mode than with GGSZ (K 0 S - ) under the K* - and K S-waves accounted for in a model where strong phase are unknown (k=1)
33
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 33 Lausanne – measurements with 7D Neyman Confidence Region: r B (DK), r B (D*K), k.r sB B (DK), B (D*K), B (DK*) = 67°± 28°(stat.) ± 13°(syst. exp.) ± 11°(Dalitz model) D0K- D0K- D* 0 K - D 0 K* - (deg) k.r sB (<0.75 @ 2 CL+ and no assumption) 2 CL 1 CL GGSZ – Combined results - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) rBrB rBrB
34
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 34 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining with B - D ( * ) K ( * )- decays Introduction Gronau-London-Wyler method Atwood-Dunietz-Soni method Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan method Combination
35
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 35 Lausanne – measurements with (deg) 1-CL = GLW+ADS+GGSZ - Combination - B ± D ( * ) K ±( * ) Sensitivity for all methods depends on r B GGSZ GLW+ADS B ± D K* ± B ± D* K ± B ± D K ±
36
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 36 Lausanne – measurements with Constraining sin( with B 0 D ( * ) decays
37
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 37 Lausanne – measurements with CP violation in B 0 D (*) Large branching fraction for favoured decay (~3 x 10 -3 ) Small BR for suppressed decay (~10 -6 ) Small CP violating amplitude Favoured b c decay Strong phase difference CKM angle + Suppressed b u decay Determines the sensitivity of the method r(D ( * ) ) ≡ r (*) = A(B 0 → D ( * )- + ) ≈ 0.015 A(B 0 → D ( * )- + ) +
38
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 38 Lausanne – measurements with Time-dependent decay rate distributions Measurements of S + and S - determine 2 + and if r is an external input Experiment : tag the flavour of the B with lepton and kaon categories combined in a neural network Mixing-Decay interference P(B 0 → D ( * ) , t) 1 C cos( m d t) + S sin( m d t) P(B 0 → D ( * ) , t) 1 C cos( m d t) - S sin( m d t) ∞ ± ± ± ± ± ± ± C = 1 – r 2 1 + r 2 ≈ 1 l+l+ lepton tag K+K+ kaon tag (4s) Tag B Reco B K+K+ ++ zz K+K+ t z/c z -s-s -- neglecting terms in o(r 2 ) S ± ≈ 2r sin ( 2 ± ), |S ± | 0.03 < ~ ± ∞
39
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 39 Lausanne – measurements with Possible CP violation on the tag side Potential competing CP violating effects in B decays used for flavour tagging signal sidetag side Lepton tags Kaon and other flavour tags ’ + P(B 0 → D ( * ) - , t) 1 + C cos( m d t) + sin( m d t) [± 2r sin(2 ) + 2r’ sin(2 ’)] ∞ Kaon tag : expect CP violation comparable to signal → Modified time distributions K+K+ Observables a, b, c K+K+ PRD68, 034010
40
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 40 Lausanne – measurements with B 0 →D* : partial reconstruction results 18710 ± 270 lepton tags 70580 ± 660 kaon tags Lepton Tags Preliminary Signal Combinatoric BB Peaking BB Continuum DD Find events with two pions and examine the missing mass m miss Lepton Tags kaon Tags Mean value A CP = N(B 0 tag) - N(B 0 tag) N(B 0 tag) + N(B 0 tag) Preliminary hep-ex/0504035
41
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 41 Lausanne – measurements with B 0 D (*) ,D full reconstruction results background Lepton tags, D* final state B modeYieldPurity (%) DD 15635 13585.5 0.3 D*D* 14554 12693.0 0.2 DD 8736 10581.7 0.4 + + 0, D + K - + +, K s + D *+ D 0 +, D 0 K - +,K - + 0,K - + - +,K s + - - Reconstruct B 0 candidate using full decay tree:
42
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 42 Lausanne – measurements with Determination of r Simultaneous determination of sin(2 + ) and r from time-evolution is not possible with current statistics Need r as an external input Estimate amplitude ratios from B 0 D s (*)+ - using SU(3) symmetry SU(3) r(D ) = 0.019 ± 0.004 r(D * ) = 0.015 ± 0.006 r(D ) = 0.003 ± 0.006 I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett. B 427, 179 (1998) Assuming several hypotheses for SU(3) : Assuming factorisation Neglect exchange and annihilation diagrams without any theoritical errors
43
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 43 Lausanne – measurements with |sin(2 + )| > 0.64 @ 68 % C.L. |sin(2 + )| > 0.42 @ 90 % C.L. - Combine partial and fully reco results for the a and c lep parameters |2 + | = 90 o 43 o 68 % 90 % 30% theoretical error on r 100% theoretical error on r Interpretation of sin(2 ) assuming SU(3) Assign theoretical error on r(D* ), r(D ) and r(D ) Bayesian approach Frequentist approach (Feldman-Cousins) 90 % CL 68 % CL www.utfit.org
44
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 44 Lausanne – measurements with Conclusion
45
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 45 Lausanne – measurements with Conclusion Measuring at B-Factories: an impossible mission a few years ago GGSZ analyses give the best results The GLW method eliminates constraints close to 90 0 All analyses are statistically limited or statistics are too low for most sensitive methods GLW,ADS,GGSZ WA = (63 +15 -12 )º |sin(2β+γ)| BaBar >0.64 (@ 68 %CL) B - D ( * ) K ( * )- (GLW, ADS, GGSZ) B 0 D ( * )
46
18 th November 2005 Guillaume Thérin 46 Lausanne – measurements with Backup Slides
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.