Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS/AC S&T programmes Towards and with Russia ERA.NET RUS WORKSHOP Lessons learned.

Published by Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS/AC S&T programmes Towards and with Russia ERA.NET RUS WORKSHOP Lessons learned."— Presentation transcript:

1 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS/AC S&T programmes Towards and with Russia ERA.NET RUS WORKSHOP Lessons learned and perspectives of bilateral S&T cooperation programmes Between EU Member States and Associated Countries and Russia 25-27 June 2009, Tallinn, Estonia Presentation and Discussion of the ERANET Russia draft analytical Report “State of the art and perspectives of bilateral S&T cooperation” Preliminary survey results among EU/AC Programme Owners Antonios Gypakis, General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Greece

2 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Overview of the presentation Background and rationale of the survey Survey preliminary results

3 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Bilateral cooperation in comparison – ERA.Net RUS survey results Methodology Bilateral cooperation between EU/AC and Russia is analysed by way of a survey among R&D funding bodies (or so-called “programme owners”) in the countries concerned.

4 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu EU/AC Programme owners were requested to answer questions regarding their cooperation in science, research, technological development and / or innovation towards Russia or with Russia Programme owners SECTION A General Information of the Programme Owners Organisation SECTION B Information about their cooperation programmes SECTION C Target Region specific qestions

5 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu The survey consists of a sample of questions, which test for a variety of aspects of bilateral R&D funding cooperation, ranging from bilateral agreements, budgets invested, programme and evaluation procedures, thematic focus, etc. SECTION B & SECTION C

6 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Methodologically it has to be mentioned that: obviously not very easy to convince programme owners to provide data for such a survey. methodological remark the comparability of data, which is for several categories of questions not given: Differences in: accounting of budgets, modes of counting bilateral projects with Russia, etc.

7 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Preliminary results of survey among EU/AC Programme Owners The survey sample includes currently complete responses of 15 organisations from the following countries: AT, CH, DE, FI, FR, GR, HU, NO, TR. Several organisations from other countries have provided only partly information up to now: BG, DK, EE, IT, NL, PL, SE. Some responding organisations from countries such as CY and RO do not have cooperation with Russia. For some countries the relevant programme owners need still to be identified and contacted in the next survey stage.

8 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Out of the sample of responding organisations, the majority or 47% are governmental organisations. Non-governmental organisations make up 33% of responding funding organisations and 20% are research institutions operating also funding programmes.

9 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Until end of June 2009 the following Russian programme owners have taken part in the Survey: Austrian Academy of SciencesInternational Bureau (DLR), Germany Austrian Science Fund (FWF)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany Österr. Forschungsgemeinschaft, AustriaGSRT, Hellenic Ministry for Development, Greece Danish National Research FoundHungarian Academy of Science Estonian Science FoundationThe Research Council of Norway Academy of FinlandSwiss National Science Foundation CNRS, FranceTUBITAK, Turkey Helmholtz Association, Germany

10 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu The instruments that the EU/AC programme owners organisations apply in order to support international S&T cooperation. Cooperation Instruments EU/AC

11 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Beneficiaries of S&T support – EU/AC

12 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Overall budget for international R&D cooperation and budget for cooperation with Russia, 2008

13 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu An interesting indicator for EU/AC programme owners is a comparison of the overall budget for international S&T cooperation with the budget for cooperation with Russia for the year 2008. Only for a limited number of organizations the budget for cooperation with Russia is available; these amounts are obviously not always separately calculated from the overall international cooperation budget. Budget

14 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu The Research Council of Norway has the highest overall international cooperation budget, which is entirely dedicated to cooperation with Russia. The Academy of Finland has, according to available figures, the second highest budget for S&T cooperation with Russia; it has been ranked at the end of the table, because the overall amount for international S&T cooperation was not available. For the Austrian Science Fund and CNRS/France it can be observed that they invest around 20% of their international S&T cooperation budget into cooperation with Russia.

15 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu ranked according to frequency of mentioning Thematic priorities – EU/AC

16 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu In terms of obstacles to bilateral S&T cooperation with Russia, responding programme owners from EU/AC mentioned most frequently: legal problems and visa problems. Cultural and language barriers as well as budget problems, including troubles with money transfer are an issue too. Obstacles – EU/AC

17 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Evaluation procedures – EU/AC The majority of the programme owners use a separate evaluation procedure.

18 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Most programme owners use optional evaluation criteria that can positively influence the funding decision The use of optional evaluation criteria

19 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu scientific excellence of project proposals and qualification and feasibility of projects Most frequently used Evaluation criteria

20 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu 69% of respondents have either no IPR rules or have not indicated any. 6% of responding organisations, funded projects need to conclude an IPR agreement for the project. 13% of responding organisations do recommend project consortia to conclude IPR agreements 13% of organisations framework agreements between the funding organisations do regulate IPR questions Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) EU/AC IPR - Rules

21 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Impact Assessments - EU/AC Less than 20% of responding programme owners organisations are performing impact assessments of their bilateral cooperation programmes with Russia. Important Notice: More organisations are planning to do such impact assessments, evaluations are becoming more important in general as a justification and planning tool.

22 RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Thank you very much for your attention Contacts: Dr. Antonios Gypakis Hellenic Ministry of Development / General Secretariat of Research and Technology Directorate of the International S&T Cooperation / EU Division 14-18 Mesogeion Av., GR-115 27 Athens, Greece Tel: +30 210 7714495, Fax: +30 210 7714153 E-mail: agypa@gsrt.gr, URL: http://www.gsrt.gr

Download ppt "RUSSIA www.era.net-rus.eu Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS/AC S&T programmes Towards and with Russia ERA.NET RUS WORKSHOP Lessons learned."

Similar presentations

WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) SP meeting Becici, 11 November 2010.

WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) SP meeting Becici, 11 November 2010.
Selection, Funding, Transparency and budgetary aspects Alexander Degelsegger, ZSI September 24, 2009.

Selection, Funding, Transparency and budgetary aspects Alexander Degelsegger, ZSI September 24, 2009.
BS-ERA.NET project- state of the art Dr. Şerban PANAITESCU Project Coordinator International Learning Network (ILN) meeting on the implementation of International.

BS-ERA.NET project- state of the art Dr. Şerban PANAITESCU Project Coordinator International Learning Network (ILN) meeting on the implementation of International.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 8 September 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Targeted Analyses.

Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 8 September 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Targeted Analyses.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.

EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Mid-term Evaluation Implementation of the EU Structural Funds in R&DI and Higher Education, 2007-2013 Stage 1: Strategic view 17.08.2011.

Mid-term Evaluation Implementation of the EU Structural Funds in R&DI and Higher Education, Stage 1: Strategic view
IRINA KUKLINA, RICHARD BURGER BRUSSELS, 25 NOVEMBER 2014 CO-FUNDING MECHANISMS OF RUSSIAN-EUROPEAN S&T COOPERATION.

IRINA KUKLINA, RICHARD BURGER BRUSSELS, 25 NOVEMBER 2014 CO-FUNDING MECHANISMS OF RUSSIAN-EUROPEAN S&T COOPERATION.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.

Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
CREST OMC Working Group Internationalisation of R&D Brussels, 3rd April 2009 2 nd Phase of the CREST OMC Working Group “Internationalisation of S&T“ Final.

CREST OMC Working Group Internationalisation of R&D Brussels, 3rd April nd Phase of the CREST OMC Working Group “Internationalisation of S&T“ Final.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.

S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Evaluation of the Humanities at the ERC Alain Peyraube CNRS and EHESS (FR) ERC Scientific Council  Relevance and Impact of the Humanities University of.

Evaluation of the Humanities at the ERC Alain Peyraube CNRS and EHESS (FR) ERC Scientific Council  Relevance and Impact of the Humanities University of.
Helsinki Sept 2007 S.Galés ERA-NET Supporting Cooperation for research infrastructures in all S&T fields 7 th FP Call Capacity Work Program: Infrastructures.

Helsinki Sept 2007 S.Galés ERA-NET Supporting Cooperation for research infrastructures in all S&T fields 7 th FP Call Capacity Work Program: Infrastructures.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 Research within Priority.

Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
LINKING SCIENCE and POLICY R E S E A R C H P R O M O T I O N F O U N D A T I O N OCT. 15-16, 2009 AMATHUS HOTEL LIMASSOL International Workshop L eonidas.

LINKING SCIENCE and POLICY R E S E A R C H P R O M O T I O N F O U N D A T I O N OCT , 2009 AMATHUS HOTEL LIMASSOL International Workshop L eonidas.
BASED ON A PRESENTATION MADE BY IRINA KUKLINA & RICHARD BURGER BRUSSELS, 25 NOVEMBER 2014 CO-FUNDING MECHANISMS OF RUSSIAN-EUROPEAN S&T COOPERATION.

BASED ON A PRESENTATION MADE BY IRINA KUKLINA & RICHARD BURGER BRUSSELS, 25 NOVEMBER 2014 CO-FUNDING MECHANISMS OF RUSSIAN-EUROPEAN S&T COOPERATION.
1 An Overview of R&D Budgeting in Korea Symposium on International Comparison of the Budget Cycle in Research Development and Innovation Policies Madrid,

1 An Overview of R&D Budgeting in Korea Symposium on International Comparison of the Budget Cycle in Research Development and Innovation Policies Madrid,
P. 1 Brokerage Event l 01/03/2011 The ERA.Net RUS Pilot Joint Call on Collaborative S&T projects Dr Martine Bonin Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg.

P. 1 Brokerage Event l 01/03/2011 The ERA.Net RUS Pilot Joint Call on Collaborative S&T projects Dr Martine Bonin Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.

ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
European Cooperation in the EU RTD Framework Programme: Experiences in FP6 and perspectives for FP7 Manfred Horvat bm:bwk and ASO Bratislava Kosice 2 nd.

European Cooperation in the EU RTD Framework Programme: Experiences in FP6 and perspectives for FP7 Manfred Horvat bm:bwk and ASO Bratislava Kosice 2 nd.
International Bureau of the BMBF - Creating international research and education networks 1 Franziska Müller Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg.

International Bureau of the BMBF - Creating international research and education networks 1 Franziska Müller Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google