1. Architect: Greg Miller, Georgia Tech Engineer: Stratton Newbert, Stanford Construction: Lori Huneryager, Stanford Apprentice: Forest Flager, Stanford Owner: Hans Verheij, Georgia Tech Architect: Greg Miller, Georgia Tech Engineer: Stratton Newbert, Stanford Construction: Lori Huneryager, Stanford Apprentice: Forest Flager, Stanford Owner: Hans Verheij, Georgia Tech Atlantic Team 2000

2. Picking a Site Boston, MA Engineering School of Atlantic University

3. Alternative T BASEMENT FLOOR 1FLOOR 2 SECTION THROUGH AUDITORIUM

4. Alternative C BASEMENT FLOOR 1FLOOR 2 SECTION THROUGH AUDITORIUM Alternative

5. Alternative O BASEMENT FLOOR 1 FLOOR 2 SECTION THROUGH AUDITORIUM ENTRY AUD.

6. Alternative L BASEMENT FLOOR 1FLOOR 2 SECTION THROUGH AUDITORIUM SOUTH ELEVATION

7. Construction Comparisons TLOC May 1 +$15,000 +$10,000 ConcreteSteel *38 Weeks *42 Weeks May 1

8. Alternative Comparisons Strong A&E Early lab access Challenging Vertical circulation Efficient layout Dramatic dome Strong architecture Vertical light & circulation Simple structure Strong circulation Early lab Truss assembly Most expensive Second egress system 3 rd Floor construction No early lab access “Opening” Life-cycle costs Cantilevered corners High % circulation space Exterior design not strong T L O C

9. Architectural Vision… High Museum, Atlanta Building EE, Downtown Disney Architect

10. Architectural Collage Architect

11. Main Entrance Architect

12. Small Classrooms Large Classrooms Computer Lab Faculty Lounge Mechanical Room Storage Restrooms Technical Support Basement Level Architect

13. Faculty Offices Chair’s Office Administration Restrooms Mechanical Room Storage First Floor Secretarial Space Architect

14. Auditorium Student Offices Laboratories Seminar Rooms Mechanical Room Restrooms Second Floor Architect

15. Basement Level

16. Re f W14 Column Fill after Anchor Bolts Secured MAT Reinf. Anchor Bolts Column Pocket Re f Base Plate

17. Construction Site Plan 8-10’ 20-25’

18. Braced Excavation Options SLURRY WALLSSOLDIER PILES Prevents horizontal flow of water Can be used as permanent retaining wall Excavation time doubled Excavation cost increased by 30% Time & Cost Benefits Groundwater should not be an issue Proper Spacing of planks can eliminate water pressure SHEET PILES Good to control seepage, construction below water table Bracing needed – beyond property line

19. Soldier Piles Excavation Finished Mats Mats in Progress Finished Walls Walls in Progress Milestone #1 Complete – 14 weeks EXCAVATION SEQUENCE 1

20. Soldier Piles Excavation Finished Mats Mats in Progress Finished Walls Walls in Progress Milestone #1 Complete – 11.5 weeks EXCAVATION SEQUENCE 2

21. Elapsed Time = 7 weeks FINAL EXCAVATION SEQUENCE

22. Basement Level REFREF Column and Pier Beyond 1 st Floor Slab Framing Beyond Embeded Channel Reinforced Concrete MAT Foundation Retaining/ Foudation Wall Construct ion Joint w/ Water Stop Re f Embeded Column w/ Studs #4@12" 1 of 8-#8 (vert) Typical Pier Re f 1 of 8-#8 (vert) #4@12" Embeded Column w/ Studs Corner Pier

23. First Floor

24. Shim Level Dropped Slab W36 1 st Floor Slab #4@12" EW Change in Slab Elevation

25. Second Floor C16X3 3.9 W16 x50 C16X3 3.9 W16 x50 W14 X90 Foundation Wall (to be added after framing complete) typtyp Continuit y P (to match beam flange) L Doubler P (not necessary ) L

26. Second Floor Arch. Features Compostit e Framing Auditorium Egress Bridge

27. Roof

28. W12X19 w/ end Pl end P bolted w/ gusset Pl L W12X19 web bolted to gusset Pl ribs offsets at apex Dome Apex

29. Structural Sequencing 1 2 Roof

30. Elev ation Plan W12X1 4 W12X1 9 ][ C12X30 L Connectio n Dome Connectio n Lower Dome Upper Dome

31. Structural Cost Budget: $450,000 NPV = $335,000 (3% inflation) *Actual Cost includes Steel Members and HVAC Penetrations Cost Comparison

32. Dome

33. Seismic Base Shear Response Spectrum Structural System RCsW (k) V (k) Steel4.56.7%3100207 Concrete310%4000400

34. Building Behavior  Mode 1  Mode 2  Mode 4  Mode 3

35. MEP Considerations Boston Annual Extremes: Max = 96 F Min = 0 F Mechanical Equipment: AHU: Carrier 48MP10R – Electric Cooling, Gas Heating W = 27,100 lbs, Dims = 48’8” x 11’3” x 8’5” Chiller: Carrier 16DF013 – Absorption Chiller & Heater W = 13,450 lbs, Dims = 12’6” x 6’8” x 7’9”

36. HVAC Layouts First FloorSecond Floor Roof 28 girder penetrations ~ $150,000 Arch Feature s Main HVAC Duct Tertiary HVAC Duct Framing Beyind Floor Slab HVAC @ Atrium Edge

37. Equipment Needs Grove TMC9210: Capacity = 120 tons Main Boom = 34-105 feet Driving Piles: Vibratory HammerExcavation = 3650 c.y. Gradall Hydraulic Excavator XL4100: Digging Depth = 22’6” Gradall Material Handler 534D-6 Maximum Lift Height = 36’ Maximum Reach = 23’ attached to crane or backhoe

38. Cost Estimating

39. Budget vs. Actual Cost Budget: $5.5 million NPV = $4.1 million (3% inflation)

40. Scheduling Start Date: October 2, 2011 Finish Date: April 26, 2012 Elapsed Time: 7 months

41. Architectural Review Security Daylight Views Total SF Percentage of Requirements Met Square Footage Comparison Architect

42. Atlantic Team Dynamics A E C I like the feel of the space Apprentice can make it fit into our budget? but what about the structure shut up and go get me some coffee Owner I’m so HAPPY Winter Quarter

43. Atlantic Team Dynamics A E C Well, I’ve graduated, so I’m out of here! Apprentice Now, how do we make our ideas buildable? Get your own coffee Stratton Who is going to get me some coffee ? Owner I’m still HAPPY Spring Quarter

44. Thank You ! Atlantic Team 2000 Mentors Greg Luth, KL&A Eric Elssesser, Frorell Elssesser Chuck Madewell Bob Tatum, Stanford Ronald Borja, Stanford