Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Part I. Introduction. Comparative and International Education. Part II. The Process of Policy Analysis The Making of Education Policy
2
Summing Up Part 1 The purpose of comparison. What is comparative education? What is international education? Comparative cross-national studies. Education and Development and Education as a Human Right. Current Global Education Issues (Social inequality, urban-rural, gender inequality, conflict)
3
Where should the 2016 Olympic Games take place? 1.Chicago 2.Tokyo 3.Rio de Janeiro 4.Madrid
4
If you were IOC President Rogge, where do you think the 2016 Olympic Games should take place? 1.Chicago 2.Tokyo 3.Rio de Janeiro 4.Madrid
5
If you were President Obama, where would you think the 2016 Olympic Games should take place? 1.Chicago 2.Tokyo 3.Rio de Janeiro 4.Madrid
6
If you were Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, where would you think the 2016 Olympic Games should take place? 1.Chicago 2.Tokyo 3.Rio de Janeiro 4.Madrid
7
Where will the 2016 Olympic Games take place? 1.Chicago 2.Tokyo 3.Rio de Janeiro 4.Madrid
8
Summing Up Part 1 The purpose of comparison. What is comparative education? What is international education? Comparative cross-national studies. Education and Development and Education as a Human Right. Current Global Education Issues (Social inequality, urban-rural, gender inequality, conflict)
9
J.J. Rousseau S Joseph Lancaster Horace Mann Domingo Faustino Sarmiento Comenius Pestalozzi
10
Comparative education Comparative studiesEducation Abroad International Education Development Education Comparative Pedagogy Intra-educational And intra-cultural studies International pedagogy Study of work of International organizations Halls typology of comparative education
11
Imposed Required Under Constraint Negotiated Under Constraint Borrowed Purposely Introduced Through Influence 1)Totalitarian/authoritarian rule, etc. 2)Defeated/occupied countries 3)Required by bilateral and multilateral agreements 4)Intentional copying of policy/practice observed elsewhere 5)General influence of educational ideas/methods Source: Phillips and Schweisfurth 2007
12
Level 1: World regions/continents Level 2: Countries Level 3: States/Provinces Level 4: Districts Level 5: Schools Level 6: Classrooms Level 7: Individuals Curriculum Teaching Methods Educational Finance Management Structures Political Change Labor Market Other aspects Ethnic Groups Age Groups Religious Groups Gender Groups Other Groups Entire Population Bray and Thomas
13
Article 26. (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
14
How do we measure progress? Inputs Per pupil Spending Processes Structures, Curriculum Outputs Educational Attainment, Literacy Outcomes Employment and Productivity, Political Participation, Social Capital
15
What is equality of educational opportunity? Conservative Definition (Position in the social structure determines education chances) Liberal Definition (Equality of Treatment) Progressive Definition (Equality of Outcomes requires inequality of treatment. Positive Discrimination).
16
IEA Studies The very first IEA study was intended to investigate the feasibility of undertaking more extensive investigations of educational achievement. This study, known as Pilot Twelve-Country Study, was conducted in 1959–62 with samples of 13- year-old students in 12 countries. Testing was carried out in five areas: mathematics, reading comprehension, geography, science, and non-verbal ability.
17
Using gradients to examine equality
18
Durchschnittliche Schülerleistungen im Bereich Mathematik Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High average performance Large socio-economic disparities Low average performance High social equity High average performance High social equity Strong socio- economic impact on student performance Socially equitable distribution of learning opportunities High mathematics performance Low mathematics performance Source: Schleicher 2007
19
Who should be educated? For what purposes? Curriculum Pedagogy Instructional resources Assessment Teacher selection Initial Training In-service Training School Organization System Administration School Management
20
Economic Context Structure of the Economy Comparative Advantage Productivity Employment Cultural Context Identity Values Norms Shared meanings Political Context State—representation Governance State legitimacy Stability Rule of Law Social Context Status Hierarchies Individual-Society Demographic Context Demographic Structure Demographic Dynamics Geographical Context Natural Endowments Human-Environmental Issues Educational Institutions
21
Five Definition of Literacy 1. ability to read and write 2. the ability to read, write, spell, listen, and speak 3. reading and writing at a level adequate for communication, or at a level that lets one understand and communicate ideas in a literate society, so as to take part in that society. communicationsociety 4. 'Literacy' is the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed and written materials associated with varying contexts. 5. Literacy is understanding, using and reflecting on written texts to enable an individual to achieve his or her goals, to develop his or her knowledge and potential, and to participate fully in the wider society
22
Between Perfect Inequality and Perfect Equality Perfect Equality Perfect Inequality
23
Part I. Introduction. Comparative and International Education. Part II. The Process of Policy Analysis The Making of Education Policy
24
I need to make an educational policy decision… I must hire an analyst to examine all alternatives Carol, please call HGSE CSO and hire an IEP graduate Sorry, they are all hired now. You are going to have to wait til June of 2010 The Making of Education Policy A synoptic model of decision making
25
The Making of Education Policy A Model of Education Decision Making
26
Policy An explicit or implicit decision which may set out directives for guiding future decisions, initiate or retard action, or guide implementation of previous decisions Strategy Multi-Program or Plan Program or Project Issue or Task
27
Discuss examples of Policy (Strategy) Describe policy How were they made?
29
In a Synoptic approach… 1.Interest groups negotiate a decision 2.A single decision maker makes a decision 3.A decision evolves over time 4.The decision is implicit
30
Steps to Policy Making Formulate Policy Assess Alternatives (Ex-Ante) Make the Decision Implement Evaluate Impact Make Adjustments New Policy Cycle
31
These steps represent a synoptic Approach to Education Polic y Analysis 1.Yes 2.No
33
This model includes the role of politics in policy making? 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree
34
Implementation Trumps Outcomes
35
Assessment of Outcomes
36
The Eightfold Path Define the Problem Assemble some Evidence Construct the Alternatives Select the Criteria Project the Outcomes Confront the Tradeoffs Decide Tell your Story
37
The Eightfold Path is a Synoptic Approach to Policy Analysis 1.Yes 2.No
38
Bureaucratic Politics
39
Based on your experience, would you say that educational research is used for educational decision making? 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree
40
Why is Research not Used? Characteristics of Education Research that influence use Characteristics of Policy Formation that influence demand for research Context and Politics of the situation
41
Education research and influence The low quality and prestige of the education research enterprise explain the lack of influence. Persistent belief that research rarely leads to improvements in practice. Need to build a strong research community to increase influence
42
Building a strong research community Contested nature of education research Pluralistic character of the enterprise Public character. Limited authority of ‘experts’. –Need more dialogue among ed. Schools, foundations, AERA. –Bring teachers into the conversation –Researchers reach out to broad constituencies
43
Kinds of evaluation use Non-use – ignoring evaluation findings Instrumental use: immediate use for decision-making Symbolic or Political use: provides legitimation Conceptual or enlightenment use: gradual percolation of findings – indirect influence
44
What is influence? Influence a continuum between direct impact and changing paradigm Conceptualizing Policy Process –Rational Models: linear, incrementalism, interactive –Political Models: policy networks, agenda setting, policy narratives, policy transfer Research Quality
45
Informed Dialogue How Education Policy is Made Knowledge as a construction Planning as a conversation
46
Dialogue space: –Convergent and divergent problems –Can one discipline solve the problem –Is technical knowledge sufficient –One or multiple decision makers –Context
47
The challenges of informing education policies Complex problems Multiple policy objectives Long-term effects of policies Controversy over program theory Multiple stakeholders Loosely coupled organizations Complex structure of ministries of education Social isolation of schools
48
Discuss some examples of ed challenges that illustrate these dimensions
49
Educational Organizations – Ministries– are similar to other Public Organizations? 1.Yes 2.No
50
Complex internal structure Inadequate funding Insufficient information and analysis Inefficient bureaucracies Lack of accountability Multiple goals Structures that do now allow horizontal communication. Staff Budgeting and Planning Corruption and patronage
51
Complex external environment Stakeholders. Different interests at different moments of the policy cycle.
52
Generation. a. State/Government/Political parties b. Curriculum Development c. Textbook production d. Construction e. Development organizations f. NGOs
53
Distribution of resources a. Teachers b. Teacher organizations c. Private providers/NGOs d. Institutions (teacher education, universities)
54
Benefits a. Students b. Parents c. Employers d. Political Groups
55
Three perspectives on knowledge utilization: Dialogue as Persuasion Dialogue as Negotiation Dialogue as Co-construction
56
Utilization as Persuasion (Emphasis on Supply of Research Results) Lack of utilization explained by the two- cultures theory Failures of communication Impact was greater where researchers had established links with policy makers Rational decision theory Alternatives to rational decision making: bureaucratic and political
57
Two applications of the utilization as dissemination approach Networking to Disseminate Information Northern Research Review and Advisory Groups REDUC in Latin America. Abstracting 28,000 documents Experiences in Africa. ERNESA, South Africa (EduSource) Policy Dialogue as Persuasion –Marketing the Results of Research
58
Utilization as Negotiation. Providing Decision Makers with Data. (Emphasis on Demand for Research Results) Knowledge Brokers Characteristics of useful research-based knowledge: a. Interdisciplinary approach b. Policy orientation in the analysis c. Understand the problem from the perspective of the client d. Fit with timing of policy cycle Syntheses of Research Training in Research Utilization
59
Applications of Dissemination as Negotiation Management Information Systems Survey Research and Information Procedures Sector Assessments
60
As in Policy Dialogue as Persuasion, Information/Knowledge is seen as the result of a highly specialized activity carried out by knowledge producers. Users have more choice to decide which knowledge they want to use.
61
Informed Dialogue. Constructing Knowledge (Emphasis on Join Construction of Knowledge by Decision Makers and Users). The limits of technical expertise The advantages of participation Qualitative judgement as an essential ingredient in policy analysis. Need for consultation. Policy formation as a political and organizational process. Two ways to understand who makes policy: Senior officials All actors in the system
62
Limits to participation Time consuming Lack of skills of researchers and planners Host cultures often do not support participation and openness
63
Two variations of participatory collaboration: Participation by Policy Makers Collaboration in research design Collaboration in data analysis Collaboration in design and implementation of policy
64
Policy Dialogue as Organizational Learning Who are the actors that matter? Planning as a conversation Dialogue as an instrument to facilitate learning
65
Unesco’s Role in Leading the Global Action Plan
66
Based on the article discussing Unesco’s role in the GAP, who is leading Education For All? 1.UNESCO 2.The World Bank 3.UNICEF 4.The Governments of Countries 5.Universities
67
To what extent did you learn new material in part 1 of the course? 1.To a great extent 2.To some extent 3.Not much 4.Not at all
68
Is the pace of the course 1.Too fast for me 2.More or less adequate for me 3.Just right for me
69
How much discussion would you like to have on fridays? 1.Less discussion, more lecture 2.About the amount of discussion we have now 3.More discussion, less lecture 4.Only discussion, no lecture
70
With regard to the readings for the course? 1.They are above my head, I can’t follow them 2.They are challenging, but I can follow 3.They are about right 4.They are too simple for me
71
With regards to discussion sections 1.I am learning from them 2.I am learning a little from them 3.I am not learning from in them
72
Have a Good Weekend
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.