1. Consensus Building Discussion of Criteria for Evaluating Proposals 1.Is the proposal workable? 2.Is the proposal acceptable? 3.Is the proposal affordable? 4.Other criteria?

2. Consensus Building Group Proposals: Group 1 Disarmament and Iran: Effects on the region.

3. Consensus Building Group Proposals: Group 2 Reorganization of the United Nations

4. Consensus Building Group Proposals: Group 3 Scenario about the Olympic games in Iran Threat of an nuclear attack on Israel

5. Consensus Building Group Proposals: Group 4 Modernization of the United Nations

6. Consensus Building Group Proposals: Group 5 Meltdown of a nuclear power plant in the PRC

7. Notes

9. GROUPS GROUP PROSCONS GROUP1-UNSC DISCUSSION ON NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT OF IRAN -Current Issue -Simulation will help prepare response for a future threat -Nuclear disarmament issues have to resolved eventually -Issue of global importance -Important to plan ahead of time before it becomes a real threat in the future -Failure if we allowed Iran to have a nuclear weapon -More important to discuss the other issue of how to prevent Iran from developing nukes -Uninteresting issue -Feasibility issues, not enough to deal with the issue (small class) -Unrealistic -Security doesn’t interest everyone -Stalemate issue GROUP2- REORGANIZATION OF UNSC (Discuss issues of equal representation) -Use the existing number of students of replicate the situation -Narrow the focus down -Current debatable issue -Third Party Intervention -Feasibility issues(Difficult to replicate Gen Assembly in Simulation) -How do you decide which countries will participate in the simulation? GROUP 3- CRISIS OVER OLYMPIC GAMES IN ‘NUKE PRODUCING ‘IRAN (International Olympic Committee to discuss whether to boycott Iran Olympics or shift venue) -Discuss Women’s issues, Involvement of Israeli athletes, Discuss sanctions scenario -Sports is a neutral issue -Feasible (IDEA 2: SOMALI PIRATES ISSUE Developing crisis management scenario, raises question of who governs Intl waters) -Shouldn’t make sports political -Individual country decision -IOC can’t take a political stand GROUP 4- WHO DISCUSSES LIMITED TREATMENT FOR AIDS-DISTRIBUTION ISSUES (Who gets the vaccines?) -Less complicated --Breakdown teams into countries with highest percentage of AIDS -Flexible topic -How do you represent all countries in the simulation? -How would you keep the representation diverse? -- WHO doesn’t act on basis of a simulation GROUP 5- NUCLEAR MELTDOWN IN N KOREA- (CHERNOBYL SCENARIO) -Discussing crisis management -How it affects different actors involved in the scenario -Opportunity to discuss root cause of the issue - Could work within the framework of 6 party talks (GROUP 6- PAK GOVT COLLAPSES Discuss breakdown of political system, Discuss ‘missing nukes’ issue )