Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CIS 630 Slides for March 3 2010. Schedule We missed two classes. I will try to make up in April Spring break– Week of March 8 Your presentations I would.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CIS 630 Slides for March 3 2010. Schedule We missed two classes. I will try to make up in April Spring break– Week of March 8 Your presentations I would."— Presentation transcript:

1 CIS 630 Slides for March 3 2010

2 Schedule We missed two classes. I will try to make up in April Spring break– Week of March 8 Your presentations I would like to have at least 3 presentations decided this week. I will make some suggestions today. Class on March 17 Qiuye Zhao will talk on minimalist grammar—a quick intro, with some discussion, about an hour in all.

3 Plan for today and March17 and 24 (not including your short presentations) I will continue with the following topics -- Reminder of the overall objective -- Some examples to finish the discussion of categorial grammars -- Return to LTAG * Some important extensions * Features and unification * Automaton Dependency Grammars Complexity of Language– Theoretical and Empirical

4 Study a few seemingly diverse systems keeping the following perspective in mind How does one evaluate (prove?) the significance (necessity) of a construct used in the specification of a grammar formalism -- Eliminate it and see whether you can do everything you could do before Some of the constructs are -- Structure: Trees, Acyclic graphs, Sets of trees… Should a sentence be covered by a single structure or a set of structures, …? -- Labels: Terminals, Non-terminals, empty nodes -- Features: atomic, attribute-value pairs, bounded or recursive, how is feature checking done, etc. ….

5 Syntactic Constituents and Semantic Types -- Not identical in all phrase structure type systems -- Identical in categorial systems/grammars Consider John likes in John likes apples * In a CG John likes has a syntactic type as well as a semantic type, S/NP (NP -> S) * In In a TAG John likes has a semantic type, NP-> S but not a syntactic type In a CG coordination is done by a schema X and X = X Exercise: Give a CG analysis for (a) John thinks Mary and Bill believes Harry will win Note that John thinks Mary and Bill believes Harry, both will have to be reduced to S/(S\NP) Exercise: John likes apples and Bill pears Hint: Reduce the left conjunct to S and then decompose it into S/(S\NP)/NP (S\NP)/NP


Download ppt "CIS 630 Slides for March 3 2010. Schedule We missed two classes. I will try to make up in April Spring break– Week of March 8 Your presentations I would."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google