1. Fermion Masses and Unification Lecture I Fermion Masses and Mixings Lecture II Unification Lecture III Family Symmetry and Unification Lecture IV SU(3), GUTs and SUSY Flavour Steve King University of Southampton

2. Lecture I Fermion Masses and Mixings 1.The Flavour Problem and See-Saw 2.From low energy data to high energy data 3.Textures in a basis Appendix 1 References Appendix 2 Basis Changing

3. 1.The Flavour Problem and See-Saw

4. The Flavour Problem 1. Why are there three families of quarks and leptons? Generations of matter Generations of matter III III  tau   -neutrino b bottom t top  muon   -neutrino s strange c charm e electron e e-neutrino Leptons d down up u Quarks Horizontal Vertical

5. b c s u d e Family symmetry e.g. SU(3) GUT symmetry e.g. SO(10) t The Flavour Problem 2. Why are quark and charged lepton masses so peculiar?

6. The Flavour Problem 3. Why is lepton mixing so large? c.f. small quark mixing Harrison, Perkins, Scott e.g.Tri-bimaximal

7.    The Flavour Problem 4. What is the origin of CP violation? Lepton CP Violation?

8. NormalInverted The Flavour Problem 5. Why are neutrino masses so small? See-saw mechanism is most elegant solution

9. The See-Saw Mechanism Light neutrinos Heavy particles

10. Type I see-saw mechanism Type II see-saw mechanism (SUSY) The see-saw mechanism Heavy triplet Type IIType I P. Minkowski (1977), Gell-Mann, Glashow, Mohapatra, Ramond, Senjanovic, Slanski, Yanagida (1979/1980) Lazarides, Magg, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Shafi, Wetterich (1981)

11. See-Saw Standard Model (type I) Yukawa couplings to 2 Higgs doublets (or one with ) Insert the vevs Rewrite in terms of L and R chiral fields, in matrix notation

12. The See-Saw Matrix Dirac matrix Heavy Majorana matrix Light Majorana matrix Diagonalise to give effective mass Type II contribution (ignored here)

13. Lepton mixing matrix V MNS Neutrino mass matrix (Majorana) Atmospheric Reactor Solar Oscillation phase Defined as Can be parametrised as

14. Quark mixing matrix V CKM Defined as Can be parametrised as Phase convention independent

15. 2.From low energy data to high energy data

16. (From Particle Data Book)

17. Ross and Serna Quark data (low energy)

18. Neutrino Masses and Mixings Normal Inverted Andre de Gouvea c.f. quark mixing angles

19. Renormalisation Group running M EW M SUSY M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 MUMU 10 16 [GeV] 10 2 RH neutrino masses Parameter at M U RG running Parameter at M EW RGEs for gauge couplings (to one loop accuracy) SM beta functionsMSSM beta functions

20. Latest coupling constant measurements at energy scale: SM couplings at low energy

21. . Two-loop RGEs for the SM:. Evolution of SM couplings

22. Two-loop RGEs for the MSSM with 1 TeV effective SUSY threshold:.. MSSM

23. Two-loop RGEs for the MSSM with 1 TeV effective SUSY threshold: MSSM

24. Two-loop RGEs for the MSSM with 250 GeV effective SUSY threshold: MSSM

25. RGEs for t,b,  in the MSSM

26. RGEs for Yukawa matrices in MSSM Wavefunction anomalous dimensionsRGEs (one-loop accuracy)

27. Charged fermion data (high energy) SUSY thresholds Ross and Serna

28. 3. Textures in a basis

29. Symmetric hierarchical matrices with 11 texture zero motivated by This motivates the symmetric down texture at GUT scale of form Hierarchical Symmetric Textures Gatto et al  ¼ 0.2 is the Wolfenstein Parameter

30. Up quarks are more hierarchical than down quarks This suggests different expansion parameters for up and down Detailed fits require numerical (order unity) coefficients

31. Detailed fits at the GUT Scale Ross and Serna No SUSY thresholds

32. With SUSY thresholds Ross and Serna Georgi-Jarlskog

33. Final remarks on choice of basis We have considered a particular choice of quark texture in a particular basis But it is shown in the Appendix that all choices of quark mass matrices that lead to the same quark masses and mixing angles may be related to each other under a change of basis. For example all quark mass matrices are equivalent to the choice However this is only true in the Standard Model, and a given high energy theory of flavour will select a particular preferred basis. Also in the see-saw mechanism all choices of see-saw matrices are NOT equivalent.

34. Appendix 1 References W. De Boer hep-ph/9402266 S.Raby ICTP Lectures 1994 G.G.Ross ICTP Lectures 2001 J.C. Pati ICTP Lectures 2001 S. Barr ICTP Lectures 2003 S. Raby hep-ph/0401115 S.Raby PDB 2006 A. Ceccucci et al PDB 2006 G. Ross and M. Serna 0704.1248 D. Chung et al hep-ph/0312378 S.F. King hep-ph/0310204

35. Appendix 2 Basis Changing 2.1 Quark sector 2.2 Effective Majorana sector 2.3 See-saw sector S.F. King hep-ph/0610239