1. Tuning Occupational Therapy Structures in Europe Sandra M. Rowan Stephanie Saenger

2. Background to Tuning Bologna Occupational Therapy Mobility Portability

3. Project Group Collaborative Time limited Flexible working Consultative

4. The Process Draft competencies Consultation Revisions Publication Validation

5. Employers and Insurance Companies Academics Non Governmental Organisations e.g. WHO Service Users Regulatory bodies Professional bodies Students

6. The UK Experience Large numbers European project Low participation rate Working through professional body Employer engagement Parallels with other standards

7. The Netherlands Experience Smaller numbers Effective Network Translation Close collaboration with Association Parallels with other documents Client participation

8. Common Experiences Creating involvement and participation Explaining Tuning Process Understanding the relevance Low response rate Learn from each others practice Same answers

9. Outcomes and Relevance to OT Practice Education Employers Service users (inter) national regulators OT- Practice

10. Education Universities  Curriculum design  Transparency  Fields of expertise  Student centred education

11. Education Students  Personal competence profile  Individual learning process  Comparable and compatible educational programmes  Mobility

12. Employers and insurance companies Transparency Quality of OT-practionars Expertise of OT-practionars Life Long Learning programmes Financial reward

13. Countries Regulators Curricula and qualifications Own benchmarks Mobility across Europe International perspective of expertise

14. Future Good dissemination of expertise around EU Employers and Service users benefit from: Wider and more varied choice of qualified OT services Practice safeguarded by competences Tool for regulators and governments