Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Population Genetics. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor B Which of these populations are in Hardy- Weinberg.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Population Genetics. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor B Which of these populations are in Hardy- Weinberg."— Presentation transcript:

1 Population Genetics

2 Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor B Which of these populations are in Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium?

3 Question 6 – Chap. 23 Researchers examining a particular gene in a fruit fly population discovered that the gene can have either of two slightly different sequences, designated A1 and A2. Further tests showed that 70% of the gametes produced in the population contained the A1 sequence. If the population is at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, what proportion of flies carries both A1 and A2? A 0.7B 0.49 C 0.21 D 0.42E 0.09

4 Question from an earlier edition of Campbell At a locus with a dominant and recessive allele in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 16% of the individuals are homozygous for the recessive allele. What is the frequency of the dominant allele in the population? A 0.84 B 0.36 C 0.6 D 0.4E 0.48

5 Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium is based on: 1. A very large population where all genotypes are equally viable 2. Random mating (panmixia) 3. No mutations 4. No gene flow (dispersal of individuals and their genes) 5. No natural selection

6 Evolutionary Change Evolution is a generation to generation change in a population’s frequencies of alleles – change in proportions of alleles in the gene pool is evolution at its smallest scale and is often referred to as microevolution The two main causes of microevolution are genetic drift and natural selection

7 Natural Selection

8 Genetic Drift Random changes in gene frequency in a population – this can lead to losses in genetic diversity – the population becomes more homozygous this is most important in small populations

9 Genetic Drift Generation 1 p (frequency of C R ) = 0.7 q (frequency of C W ) = 0.3 CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CWCWCWCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW

10 Genetic Drift 5 plants leave off- spring Generation 1 p (frequency of C R ) = 0.7 q (frequency of C W ) = 0.3 CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CWCWCWCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CWCWCWCW CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CWCWCWCW CRCWCRCW CWCWCWCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCWCRCW Generation 2 p = 0.5 q = 0.5

11 Genetic Drift 5 plants leave off- spring Generation 1 p (frequency of C R ) = 0.7 q (frequency of C W ) = 0.3 CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CWCWCWCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CWCWCWCW CRCWCRCW CRCRCRCR CWCWCWCW CRCWCRCW CWCWCWCW CRCRCRCR CRCWCRCW CRCWCRCW Generation 2 p = 0.5 q = 0.5 2 plants leave off- spring CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR CRCRCRCR Generation 3 p = 1.0 q = 0.0

12 Population Bottleneck

13 Original population

14 Original population Bottlenecking event

15 Original population Bottlenecking event Surviving population

16 Northern Elephant Seal

17 Northern Elephant Seal Population

18 Pre-bottleneck (Illinois, 1820) Post-bottleneck (Illinois, 1993) Greater prairie chicken Range of greater prairie chicken (a) Location Population size Number of alleles per locus Percentage of eggs hatched 93 <50 5.2 3.7 5.8 99 96 1,000–25,000 <50 750,000 75,000– 200,000 Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck) (b) Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck) Illinois 1930–1960s 1993

19 Pre-bottleneck (Illinois, 1820) Post-bottleneck (Illinois, 1993) Greater prairie chicken Range of greater prairie chicken (a)

20 Location Population size Number of alleles per locus Percentage of eggs hatched 93 <50 5.2 3.7 5.8 99 96 1,000–25,000 <50 750,000 75,000– 200,000 Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck) (b) Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck) Illinois 1930–1960s 1993

21 Founder effect – founder population and three possible new populations

22 Mal de Meleda – founder effect

23 Serial Founder Effect Serial founder effects have occurred when populations migrate over long distances. Such long distance migrations typically involve relatively rapid movements followed by periods of settlement. The populations in each migration carry only a subset of the genetic diversity carried from previous migrations. As a result, genetic differentiation tends to increase with geographic distance.

24 Movement of mitochondrial genes out of Africa

25 ‘Wisteria vine’ model of human genetic diversity

26 Gene Flow Gene flow is the movement of alleles in and out of a population Gene flow occurs because gametes or fertile individuals move from one population to another and take their genes with them

27 Gene flow

28 Gene Flow in Conifers

29 Population in which the surviving females eventually bred Central Eastern Survival rate (%) Females born in central population Females born in eastern population Parus major 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Central population NORTH SEA Eastern population Vlieland, the Netherlands 2 km

30 Non-Random Mating Hardy-Weinberg assumes random mating – if mating is not random then the population may change in the short term – the most common form of non-random mating is in-breeding – the mating of closely related individuals In fact inbreeding is very common – many mammals probably mate with first or second cousins in the wild; many plants self-pollinate – the ultimate form of inbreeding Inbreeding tends to produce homozygous populations

31 Inbreeding and White Squirrels

32 Mutations Mutations are the ultimate source of new genetic variations – a new mutation that is transmitted in gametes immediately changes the gene pool of a population by inserting a new allele into the gene pool

33

34


Download ppt "Population Genetics. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination a)A b)B c)both A and B d)neither A nor B Which of these populations are in Hardy- Weinberg."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google