Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Ingot Casting Continuous Casting Welding & Laser Remelting Directional Casting Shaped Casting Solidification Processing
2
R – Tip Radius 2 – Secondary Arm Spacing 1 – Primary Arm Spacing Dendritic Array Growth Temperature Gradient, G Growth Velocity, V Diffusion + Convection exist in the Melt
3
Modeling Dendritic Array Growth Experimental modeling: TGS + Transparent Materials Controlled G and V Minimum Convection Numerical modeling: Self-consistent model G/V Dendrites G/V Cells A.Single Cell/Dendrite B.Cellular/Dendritic Array
4
Numerical Modeling of Cellular/Dendritic Array Growth (Diffusion Controlled Growth + No Convection concerned) Basic Parameters Given : Materials Properties: C 0, m L, k, D L, ( / S), E 4, Solidification Condition: G and V Unknown: R, 1, T (T i )
5
Numerical Modeling of Cellular/Dendritic Array Growth (Diffusion Controlled Growth + No Convection concerned)
6
Numerical Method : Solute Flow: i+1 C i+1 - i C i = A N (V N C + DdC/dr) N dt – A S (V S C + DdC/dr) S dt + A E (V E C + DdC/dx) E dt – A w (V W C + DdC/dx) w dt
7
Spacing Adjustment of Array Growth Spacing, 1 as Velocity, V Mechanism of Spacing Adjustment Lower Limit Upper Limit V
8
Array Stability Criterion Unstable Stable Solute
9
Result I: Shapes of Single Cell/Dendrite
10
Result I: Single Cell Growth in fine capillary tubes 200 m Stable CellPerturbed Cell
11
Result II: Primary Spacing
12
Result II: Primary Spacing – SCN – 5.6 wt.% H 2 O System
13
Result II: Primary Spacing – NH 4 Cl - 70 wt.% H 2 O System
14
Result III: Tip Radius 20 m The relation, R 2 V = Constant, is confirmed for all the cases examined in both experimental modeling and numerical modeling.
16
Result IV: Growth Undercooling TT TLTL TiTi
17
Result V: The Effect of Temperature Gradient
18
Modeling Rapid Solidification Diffusion Coefficient – Temperature Dependent: D as T D = D 0 exp[-Q/(RT)] Distribution Coefficient – Velocity Dependent: k as V , Aziz (1988) where Non-equilibrium vs. Equilibrium: Boettinger etc. (1986) G , V , T Laser Remelting
19
Result VI: Rapid Solidification
20
Result VII: Global Structure Planar Cellular Dendritic Cellular Planar V
21
Development of Semi-analytical Expressions (Hunt/Lu Model) 1. Variables: Composition, C 0, Liquidus Slop, m, Distribution Coefficient, k, Diffusion Coefficient, D, Gibbs-Thompson Coefficient, , Surface Energy Anisotropy Coefficient, E 4, Growth Velocity, V, Temperature Gradient, G, Primary Spacing,, and Tip Undercooling, T. 2.Dimensionless Parameters: Temperature Gradient: G’ = G k/ T 0 2 Growth Velocity: V’ = V k/(D T 0 ) Primary Spacing: ’ = DT 0 /(k ) Tip Undercooling: T’ = T/ T 0 where T 0 = mC 0 (1-1/k) 3.Properties of the Non-dimensionalization: G’ = V’: Constitutional Undercooling Limit --- V = GD/ T 0 V’ = 1: Absolute Stability Limit --- V = T 0 D/(k ) T’ = 1: The undercooling with a planar front growth --- T = T 0 = mC 0 (1-1/k)
22
Result VIII: Semi-analytical Expressions (Hunt/Lu Model) 1.Cellular Growth (Derived from the Array Stability Criterion): Undercooling: T’ = T’ s + T’ r T’ s = G’/V’ + a +(1-a)V’ 0.45 – G’/V’[a + (1-a)V’ 0.45 ] where a = 5.273 x10 -3 + 0.5519k – 0.1865k 2 Tr’ = b(V’ – G’) 0.55 (1-V’) 1.5 where b = 0.5582 – 0.2267log(k) + 0.2034{log(k)] 2 Cell Spacing: ’ 1 = 8.18k -0.485 V’ -0.29 (V’ – G’) -0.3 T’ s -0.3 (1-V’) -1.4 2.Dendritic Growth: Undercooling: T’ = T’ s + T’ r T’ s = G’/V’ + V’ 1/3 T’ r = 0.41(V’ – G’) 0.51 Primary Dendrite Spacing (Derived from the Array Stability Criterion): ’ 1 = 0.156V’ (c-0.75)( V’ – G’)0.75G’ –0.6028 where c = -1.131 – 0.1555log(G’) – 0.7598 x 10 -2 [log(G’)] 2 * Expressions are developed with the Array Stability Criterion
23
Experimental Modeling of Grain Formation in Casting
24
Tip Radius, R , Spacing, 1 as Velocity, V Deceleration Experimental Modeling: Effect of Deceleration on the Dendritic Array Growth (SCN - 5.5 wt.% H 2 O System) R 1 Tip Radius, R: Rapid response to velocity change. Every individual dendrite follows the Marginal Stability criterion approximately during deceleration. Primary Spacing, 1 : Slow response to velocity change.The array is unstable and is in transient condition during deceleration.
25
Experimental Modeling: Effect of Deceleration on the Dendritic Array Growth – Fragmentation (SCN - 5.5 wt.% H 2 O System) Continuous Deceleration, a = -1.0 ms -2 High Velocity Low Velocity Secondary Arm, 2, Detached due to deceleration – Accelerated ripening process. The fragmentation rate is proportional to the deceleration.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.