Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones

3 Pitch of pure tones Place theory Place of maximum in basilar membrane excitation (excitation pattern) - which fibers excited Timing theory Temporal pattern of firing - how are the fibers firing - needs phase locking

4 Phase-locking 2 periods1 period nerve spike

5 Pure tones: place vs timing Low frequency tones Place & timing High frequency tones Place only 1. Phase locking only for tones below 4 kHz 2. Frequency difference threshold increases rapidly above 4 kHz. 3. Musical pitch absent above 4 kHz (top of piano)

6 Frequency thresholds increase above 4 kHz B C J Moore (1973) JASA. Phase-lock? YesNo

7 Pitch of complex tones: fundamental & harmonics

8 Helmholtz’s place theory Pitch = frequency of fundamental Coded by place of excitation Peaks in excitation

9 Arguments against Helmholtz 1. Fundamental not necessary for pitch (Seebeck)

10 Missing fundamental No fundamental but you still hear the pitch at 200 Hz Track 37

11 Distortion: Helmholtz fights back Sound stimulus Middle-ear distortion Produces f2 - f1 600 - 400 Sound going into cochlea

12 Against Helmholtz: Masking the fundamental Unmasked complex still has a pitch of 200 Hz Tracks 40-42

13 200 850 1050 1250 200 amp Against Helmholtz: Enharmonic sounds Middle-ear distortion gives difference tone (1050 - 850 = 200) BUT Pitch heard is actually about 210 Tracks 38-39

14 Schouten’s theory Pitch due to beats of unresolved harmonics Tracks 43-45

15 Problems with Schouten’s theory (1) 1. Resolved harmonics dominant in pitch perception - not unresolved (Plomp, 1967) “down” frequency (Hz) 200 1.0 400600800 2000 2400 “down”

16 Problems with Schouten (2) 2.Pitch discrimination much worse for unresolved than resolved (Houtsma & Smurzynski (1990, JASA). res --> unres good bad

17 Problems with Schouten (3) 3. Musical pitch is weak for complex sounds consisting only of unresolved harmonics (Houtsma, 1984, Music Perception)

18 Against Schouten (4): Dichotic harmonics Pitch of complex tone still heard with one harmonic to each ear (Houtsma & Goldstein, 1972) 400600 200 Hz pitch No chance of distortion tones or physical beats

19 Goldstein’s theory Pitch based on resolved harmonics Brain estimates frequencies of resolved harmonics (eg 402 597 806) - could be by a place mechanism, but more likely through phase-locked timing information. Then finds the best-fitting consecutive harmonic series to those numbers (eg 401 602 804) -> pitch of 200.5

20 Two pitch mechanisms ? Goldstein has difficulty with the fact that unresolved harmonics have a pitch at all. So: Goldstein’s mechanism could be good as the main pitch mechanism With Schouten’s being a separate (weaker) mechanism for unresolved harmonics

21 Schouten’s + Goldstein's theories -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 base apex log (ish) frequency 200400 1600 resolved unresolved 600 800 Output of 1600 Hz filterOutput of 200 Hz filter -2 -1.5 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 00.20.40.60.81 1/200s = 5ms -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 00.20.40.60.81 1/200s = 5ms

22 Some other sounds that give pitch SAM Noise: envelope timing - not spectral –Sinusoidally amplitude modulated noise Rippled noise - envelope timing & spectral –Comb-filter (f(t) + f(t-T)) -> sinusoidal spectrum –Huygens @ the steps from a fountain –Quetzal @ Chichen Itza Binaural interactions 100 200

23 Huygen’s repetition pitch Christian Huygens in 1693 noted that the noise produced by a fountain at the chateau of Chantilly de la Cour was reflected by a stone staircase in such a way that it produced a musical tone. He correctly deduced that this was due to the successively longer time intervals taken for the reflections from each step to reach the listener's ear.

24

25 Effect of SNHL Wider bandwidths, so fewer resolved harmonics Therefore more reliance on Schouten's mechanism - less musical pitch?

26 Problem we haven’t addressed What happens when you have two simultaneous pitches - as with two voices or two instruments - or just two notes on a piano? How do you know which harmonic is from which pitch?


Download ppt "Hearing & Deafness (4) Pitch Perception 1. Pitch of pure tones 2. Pitch of complex tones."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google