1. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Introduction to Information Retrieval (cont.): Boolean Model University of California, Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems SIMS 202: Information Organization and Retrieval Lecture authors: Marti Hearst & Ray Larson

2. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval The Standard Retrieval Interaction Model

3. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval IR is an Iterative Process Repositories Workspace Goals

4. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval A sketch of a searcher… “moving through many actions towards a general goal of satisfactory completion of research related to an information need.” (after Bates 89) Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

5. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Restricted Form of the IR Problem The system has available only pre-existing, “canned” text passages. Its response is limited to selecting from these passages and presenting them to the user. It must select, say, 10 or 20 passages out of millions or billions!

6. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Information Retrieval Revised Task Statement: Build a system that retrieves documents that users are likely to find relevant to their queries. This set of assumptions underlies the field of Information Retrieval.

7. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Some IR History –Roots in the scientific “Information Explosion” following WWII –Interest in computer-based IR from mid 1950’s H.P. Luhn at IBM (1958) Probabilistic models at Rand (Maron & Kuhns) (1960) Boolean system development at Lockheed (‘60s) Vector Space Model (Salton at Cornell 1965) Statistical Weighting methods and theoretical advances (‘70s) Refinements and Advances in application (‘80s) User Interfaces, Large-scale testing and application (‘90s)

8. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Structure of an IR System Search Line Interest profiles & Queries Documents & data Rules of the game = Rules for subject indexing + Thesaurus (which consists of Lead-In Vocabulary and Indexing Language Storage Line Potentially Relevant Documents Comparison/ Matching Store1: Profiles/ Search requests Store2: Document representations Indexing (Descriptive and Subject) Formulating query in terms of descriptors Storage of profiles Storage of Documents Information Storage and Retrieval System Adapted from Soergel, p. 19

9. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Structure of an IR System Search Line Interest profiles & Queries Documents & data Rules of the game = Rules for subject indexing + Thesaurus (which consists of Lead-In Vocabulary and Indexing Language Storage Line Potentially Relevant Documents Comparison/ Matching Store1: Profiles/ Search requests Store2: Document representations Indexing (Descriptive and Subject) Formulating query in terms of descriptors Storage of profiles Storage of Documents Information Storage and Retrieval System Adapted from Soergel, p. 19

10. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Structure of an IR System Search Line Interest profiles & Queries Documents & data Rules of the game = Rules for subject indexing + Thesaurus (which consists of Lead-In Vocabulary and Indexing Language Storage Line Potentially Relevant Documents Comparison/ Matching Store1: Profiles/ Search requests Store2: Document representations Indexing (Descriptive and Subject) Formulating query in terms of descriptors Storage of profiles Storage of Documents Information Storage and Retrieval System Adapted from Soergel, p. 19

11. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Structure of an IR System Search Line Interest profiles & Queries Documents & data Rules of the game = Rules for subject indexing + Thesaurus (which consists of Lead-In Vocabulary and Indexing Language Storage Line Potentially Relevant Documents Comparison/ Matching Store1: Profiles/ Search requests Store2: Document representations Indexing (Descriptive and Subject) Formulating query in terms of descriptors Storage of profiles Storage of Documents Information Storage and Retrieval System Adapted from Soergel, p. 19

12. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Relevance (introduction) In what ways can a document be relevant to a query? –Answer precise question precisely. –Who is buried in grant’s tomb? Grant. –Partially answer question. –Where is Danville? Near Walnut Creek. –Suggest a source for more information. –What is lymphodema? Look in this Medical Dictionary. –Give background information. –Remind the user of other knowledge. –Others... Ideally, IR systems should retrieve ALL and ONLY the RELEVANT documents for a user…

13. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Query Languages A way to express the question (information need) Types: –Boolean –Natural Language –Stylized Natural Language –Form-Based (GUI)

14. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Simple query language: Boolean –Terms + Connectors (or operators) –terms words normalized (stemmed) words phrases thesaurus terms –connectors AND OR NOT

15. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Queries Cat Cat OR Dog Cat AND Dog (Cat AND Dog) (Cat AND Dog) OR Collar (Cat AND Dog) OR (Collar AND Leash) (Cat OR Dog) AND (Collar OR Leash)

16. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Queries (Cat OR Dog) AND (Collar OR Leash) –Each of the following combinations works: Catxxxx Dogxxxxx Collarxxxx Leashxxxx

17. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Queries (Cat OR Dog) AND (Collar OR Leash) –None of the following combinations work: Catxx Dogxx Collarxx Leashxx

18. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Logic A B

19. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Queries –Usually expressed as INFIX operators in IR ((a AND b) OR (c AND b)) –NOT is UNARY PREFIX operator ((a AND b) OR (c AND (NOT b))) –AND and OR can be n-ary operators (a AND b AND c AND d) –Some rules - (De Morgan revisited) NOT(a) AND NOT(b) = NOT(a OR b) NOT(a) OR NOT(b)= NOT(a AND b) NOT(NOT(a)) = a

20. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Logic 3t33t3 1t11t1 2t22t2 1D11D1 2D22D2 3D33D3 4D44D4 5D55D5 6D66D6 8D88D8 7D77D7 9D99D9 10 D 10 11 D 11 m1m1 m2m2 m3m3 m5m5 m4m4 m7m7 m8m8 m6m6 m 2 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 1 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 4 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 3 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 6 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 5 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 8 = t 1 t 2 t 3 m 7 = t 1 t 2 t 3

21. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Searching “Measurement of the width of cracks in prestressed concrete beams” Formal Query: cracks AND beams AND Width_measurement AND Prestressed_concrete Cracks Beams Width measurement Prestressed concrete Relaxed Query: (C AND B AND P) OR (C AND B AND W) OR (C AND W AND P) OR (B AND W AND P)

22. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Psuedo-Boolean Queries A new notation, from web search –+cat dog +collar leash Does not mean the same thing! Need a way to group combinations. Phrases: –“stray cat” AND “frayed collar” –+“stray cat” + “frayed collar”

23. Information need Index Pre-process Parse Collections Rank Query text input

24. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Result Sets Run a query, get a result set Two choices –Reformulate query, run on entire collection –Reformulate query, run on result set Example: Dialog query (Redford AND Newman) -> S1 1450 documents (S1 AND Sundance) ->S2 898 documents

25. Information need Index Pre-process Parse Collections Rank Query text input Reformulated Query Re-Rank

26. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Ordering of Retrieved Documents Pure Boolean has no ordering In practice: –order chronologically –order by total number of “hits” on query terms What if one term has more hits than others? Is it better to one of each term or many of one term? Fancier methods have been investigated –p-norm is most famous usually impractical to implement usually hard for user to understand

27. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Boolean Advantages –simple queries are easy to understand –relatively easy to implement Disadvantages –difficult to specify what is wanted –too much returned, or too little –ordering not well determined Dominant language in commercial systems until the WWW

28. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Faceted Boolean Query Strategy: break query into facets (polysemous with earlier meaning of facets) –conjunction of disjunctions a1 OR a2 OR a3 b1 OR b2 c1 OR c2 OR c3 OR c4 –each facet expresses a topic “rain forest” OR jungle OR amazon medicine OR remedy OR cure Smith OR Zhou AND

29. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Faceted Boolean Query Query still fails if one facet missing Alternative: Coordination level ranking –Order results in terms of how many facets (disjuncts) are satisfied –Also called Quorum ranking, Overlap ranking, and Best Match Problem: Facets still undifferentiated Alternative: assign weights to facets

30. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Proximity Searches Proximity: terms occur within K positions of one another –pen w/5 paper A “Near” function can be more vague –near(pen, paper) Sometimes order can be specified Also, Phrases and Collocations –“United Nations” “Bill Clinton” Phrase Variants –“retrieval of information” “information retrieval”

31. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Filters Filters: Reduce set of candidate docs Often specified simultaneous with query Usually restrictions on metadata –restrict by: date range internet domain (.edu.com.berkeley.edu) author size limit number of documents returned

32. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval How are the texts handled? What happens if you take the words exactly as they appear in the original text? What about punctuation, capitalization, etc.? What about spelling errors? What about plural vs. singular forms of words What about cases and declension in non- english languages? What about non-roman alphabets?

33. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Content Analysis Automated Transformation of raw text into a form that represent some aspect(s) of its meaning Including, but not limited to: –Automated Thesaurus Generation –Phrase Detection –Categorization –Clustering –Summarization

34. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Techniques for Content Analysis Statistical –Single Document –Full Collection Linguistic –Syntactic –Semantic –Pragmatic Knowledge-Based (Artificial Intelligence) Hybrid (Combinations)

35. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Text Processing Standard Steps: –Recognize document structure titles, sections, paragraphs, etc. –Break into tokens usually space and punctuation delineated special issues with Asian languages –Stemming/morphological analysis –Store in inverted index (to be discussed later)

36. Information need Index Pre-process Parse Collections Rank Query text input How is the query constructed? How is the text processed?

37. Information Organization and Retrieval Document Processing Steps

38. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Stemming and Morphological Analysis Goal: “normalize” similar words Morphology (“form” of words) –Inflectional Morphology E.g,. inflect verb endings and noun number Never change grammatical class –dog, dogs –tengo, tienes, tiene, tenemos, tienen –Derivational Morphology Derive one word from another, Often change grammatical class –build, building; health, healthy

39. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Automated Methods Powerful multilingual tools exist for morphological analysis –PCKimmo, Xerox Lexical technology –Require a grammar and dictionary –Use “two-level” automata Stemmers: –Very dumb rules work well (for English) –Porter Stemmer: Iteratively remove suffixes –Improvement: pass results through a lexicon

40. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Errors Generated by Porter Stemmer (Krovetz 93)

41. 9/6/2001Information Organization and Retrieval Next Statistical Properties of Text Preparing information for search: Lexical analysis Introduction to the Vector Space model of IR.