Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
The Criminal Justice System
Structure & Process
2
The Criminal Justice Process
Cycles individuals from the status of “free citizen” to that of suspect, then defendant, to convicted offender, probationer/inmate, parolee/released “offender” – as such “integrates” the System
3
How does this work? A series of stages administered by a number of subsystems with different goals, values, and structures The activities are expected to “sum to the “overall goal” and create the appearance of a “system
4
Criminal Justice System
5
The Stages in the Process
Hearing on Pre-Trial Motions Trial Sentencing Appeals/Post Conviction Remedies Conditions of Sentence Release Parole/Revocation Discharge Observation/Report Investigation Arrest/Booking Initial Appearance Determination of Formal Charge Arraignment, Indictment, or Information
6
Bases for the Process – Values and Value Conflicts
Due process Fundamental Fairness Propriety Freedom from Cruel and Unusual Punishment Equal Protection Rule of Law Presumption of Innocence
7
Values (cont) Constitutional Government Separation of Power Federalism
Civil Rights Majority Rule Individualism Human Dignity Social Justice
8
Multiple Goals Detect, Apprehend, Convict, Incapacitate
Deter Potential Offenders Create an Ordered Society
9
Two Different Purposes
Control by “solving” crimes Control by “preventing” crimes
10
Solving Crime Control crime by solving offenses, arresting suspects, and processing and incapacitating offenders Deals with the immediate and rests on the discovery of past criminal behavior
11
Preventing Crime Preventing crime through these processes or other means Forward looking, forecasting, forestalling future crimes by present interventions
12
Measures of Effectiveness
High arrest rates Charging the highest possible crimes Convicting offenders as charged Sentencing to maximum terms Arrest only under extreme conditions Direct violators to other agencies Charge only according to what is best for the person Use probation/community corrections for a short period of time
13
Questions Raised What is a “good” judge? What is a “good” prosecutor?
What is a “good” corrections program? What is a “good” law enforcement” agency?
14
Approaches to Deterrence
Belief in the certainty of criminal justice process and reliance on the severity of consequences System should be nearly invisible while having a belief that it is operating efficiently Prevention of opportunities
15
Creating an Ordered Society
Effectiveness and efficiency of the Criminal Justice Process Reliance on elements which are more symbolic and ceremonial Note: The agencies in the Criminal Justice System are “agents” of the status quo
16
Conclusions and Consequences
The Criminal Justice System is comprised of a set of “subsystems” which have different and sometimes contradictory goals Personnel within agency unit can be expected to have a vested interest in its survival if not expansion System maintenance concerns are important factors in understanding the way the CJS operates and provide a basis for change
17
Present Conditions – no CJS agency is completely effective and efficient
Most crimes, particularly property crimes reported to the police are never “solved” Prosecutorial role is often one of negotiation rather than trial Judges are somewhat unsure of their effectiveness in sentencing Correctional programs often fall far short of rehabilitation or reintegration
18
Functions Differ – but regardless of goals rests on governmental authority – it is a “legal” system
Law Enforcement Prosecutorial/Defense Trial Court Corrections
19
Law Enforcement Functions
Enforce Laws Maintain Order Provide Services Enforce Convenience Norms
20
Sources of Authority Differ
Legislative Executive Judicial (Appellate Courts) Administrative
21
Authorities Crimes are defined by legislation
Executive branch functions primarily to initiate legislation, appoint administrators and propose budgets Appellate courts interpret the laws Administrative agencies and officers e.g. police, prosecution, trial courts enforce law, collectively operate the overall CJ process and assure various degrees of operational rule-making authority
22
Differ in Structure Distinctness of agencies and offices – non-interchangeable personnel Separate, unrelated budgets Differing, jurisdictional boundaries – e.g not one police agency
23
Differ in Structure (cont)
Separate human resource pools with personnel in each agency recruited from different populations Differing patterns of personnel selection Variations in the amount of client and indirect citizen involvement in the decision making process
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.