1. In or Out? Faculty Research and Consulting Richard Jensen University of Notre Dame Jerry Thursby Emory University Marie Thursby Georgia Tech & NBER Supported by the E.M. Kauffman Foundation & National Science Foundation

2. Motivation: An Empirical Anomaly ¼ of sample of 5772 US patents with US university faculty inventor solely assigned to for-profit firms (Thursby, Thursby, and Fuller 2006) –Employment contracts specify university IP ownership –Bayh-Dole Act allows university ownership of federally funded IP –US universities typically insist on ownership of firm sponsored research Interviews suggest consulting as an explanation We argue explanation must include analysis not only of consulting decisions but also decisions of government and industrial funding agents Theory to derive implications and empirical testing

3. Theoretical Model Faculty can research own project in the university with gov and firm funding and receive c for time spent outside on the firm’s project –Patents from university project assigned to university –Patents from consulting assigned to firm Two stage game –Stage 1: Gov and firm choose G and F –Stage 2: Firm chooses c and Researcher chooses t Allow for –Projects of different difficulty (x I, x O ) –Differing faculty quality (q) β) –Benefit to firm project from faculty’s university research (β) α) –Difference in effectiveness of G and F for university research (1, α) –University and firm infrastructure (K I, K O )

4. Time in Consulting Unit Consulting Fee ↑ β, K o, x o rFrFrFrF r F // rIrIrIrI r I // ↑α, K I, x I ↑q ↑G ↑F

5. Firm Funding rFrFrFrF r F // rGrGrGrG r I // GovernmentFunding ↑q ↑ β, K o, x o ↑α, K I, x I

6. Thursby, Thursby & Fuller sample - Based on 34202 scientists and engineers - 87 RI US universities in 1993 - Patenting over selected years in the 90’s to 2004 Due to data availability we consider 1990’s patents at Purdue MIT Stanford Wisconsin Georgia Tech Cornell Pennsylvania Texas A&M

7. Sample Characteristics 1767 Patent/Inventor Pairs Assignment Firm28.2% University67.2% Unassigned1.9% US Gov't0.9% Not-For-Profit & Firm1.6% US Gov't & Not-For-Profit0.2%

8. Econometric Model Dependent Variable = 1 if assigned to university = 0 if assigned to firm Independent Variables Total publications Total citations to these publications Federal research funds Industry research funds Other research funds Gender Age Fixed effects University Year Technology category

9. Means for Important Variables Publications7 Citations271 Federal funding796000 Industry funding157000 Other funding77000

10. Logit Results – Odds Ratio Odds Ratiop-Value Publications1.0620.000 Citations1.0000.041 Federal funding0.9060.007 Industry funding2.3120.046 Other funding1.2670.473 No. Observations1280 Pseudo r-Square0.223