Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Statistical Process Control for Aerospace Manufacturing
Presented by: Ben Allister (Infodream Ltd) Intro & presentation plan. Intro to myself
2
Software Developer and Continuous Improvement (CI) competence centre
Introduction To Infodream Software Developer and Continuous Improvement (CI) competence centre Real Time QC Software Real Time Data Collection and Process Control Bespoke industrial software solutions Integrated Advanced Quality Toolbox Cont Imp. Services Training Strategy and implementation On-site Mentoring & Services Mention SPC Vision is part of Qualaxy suite which also consists of other shopfloor modules NC management Process planning EN9103 KC management
3
Some of Our Clients Aerospace Nantes (FR) Saint Nazaire (FR)
Toulouse (FR) Filton (UK) Stade (GE) Illescas (SP) Marignane (FR) La Courneuve (FR) Filton (UK) Méru (FR) Conflans Ste H. Fareham (UK) Méaulte (FR) Saint Nazaire (FR) Genève (CH) Liège (BE) Montrichard(FR) Niort (79) Roche la Molière (42) Le Havre (FR) Toulouse (FR) Genevilliers Evry - Corbeil Le Creusot Valenciennes (FR) Issoire (63) Modane (73) Toulouse (FR)
4
What is SPC Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a continuous improvement tool Reduce waste Improve quality Increase productivity Tells us whether our processes can consistently meet the customer requirements Identifies sources of unwanted variability in the process and helps us understand the relationship between product & process Pro-actively monitors &controls the process to avoid defects and failures
5
A Tool for Continuous Improvement
What is SPC A Tool for Continuous Improvement - Using meaningful data Statistical - To understand a process Process SPC should not be about complex maths although many people like to confuse people with their super 6 sigma tools which nobody else understands. - To make it behave the way we want Control
6
Good Bad Understanding Variation Limit Limit
SPC is based on process variation. Only 2 outcomes – in or out Through the posts = 3 points Outside the posts = nothing But, the ball never goes through the centre every time!
7
Bad Understanding Variation Limit
There is variation in the kicking process
8
Variation Understanding Variation Limit
Variation is caused by lots of factors Wind kicking angle distance kicking ability how much the player had to drink the night before! Coaches will have lots of statistics to help them choose the best kicker and have the highest probability of scoring.
9
Variation Cost Understanding Variation (The Enemy) - Material Waste
Limit Variation Target Cost (The Enemy) - Material Waste Scrap Repair Ass’y Problems Tight tolerances Additional operations Increased Inspection Manufacturing process also contain variation. But, the effect is not so straightforward or widely understood. A famous japanese guy named Taguchi demonstrated that any deviation from Target produces a knock on cost (Taguchi loss function) - this is the basis for methodologies such as 6 Sigma. In manufacturing you will recognise the costs as (see list)
10
Too Much! Understanding Variation LSL USL _ X The key is to understand
- How much variation there is _ X
11
Understanding Variation
LSL USL Better..... _ X
12
Best? Understanding Variation LSL USL _ X
High degree of confidence unless something special happens _ X
13
Process Control May April March Feb Jan And how to control it
- Need to stabilise the process so that it is consistent. March Feb Jan
14
Process Control May April March Feb Jan
15
Inspection Product validation - Traditional Inspection What about….
Is the part good or bad ? Is a concession needed ? Is further work needed ? Upper Limit Lower Limit What about…. Does the process need adjusting Will the next part be good? For SPC, one key element is required - DATA
16
Inspection to be used for continuous improvement
Data Approach Quantify how good or bad process is. Is ‘Tool A’ better than ‘Tool B’? Is something wrong with the process? Should I adjust the process? How often is inspection needed? Can tolerances be met? SPC approach changes inspection from a NVA operation to a value adding continuous improvement tool. “Confidence in the Process” Inspection to be used for continuous improvement
17
Detection Prevention Summary Traditional Approach SPC Approach
Product Inspection Action on the product Product Inspection Rectification Detection Product Information on the process Action on the process Man Method Machine Material Measurement Environment SPC Approach Process control Prevention Traditional relies on inspecting to control quality – not really quality at all SPC focus on measuring the process and product to control and assure quality Key is to understand the important inputs to the process the relationship with the product and how to control them in order minimise variation, prevent rejects and assure quality.
18
Key Benefits - Reduce waste due to Scrap & Repair - Reduce NVA such as Inspection and unnecessary process steps - Provide objective data for continuous improvement and new product development - Create a LEAN environment by ensuring a stable and consistent process Have confidence your process will achieve customer requirements – First Time & Every Time
19
Aerospace Aerospace invests large sums of money on metrology systems
CMM’s Laser Trackers Measurement arms Machine probes …….. Is the data being put to good use? Or
20
All Wrong Misconceptions “ SPC is only for automotive”
“ You can’t pull into the hard shoulder at 40,000 feet” “ SPC is can’t be used for low volume production” “ Aerospace tolerances are too tight for SPC” “ CAA doesn’t allow SPC” All Wrong SPC is obviously used in automotive, but why? - because the industry realised that quality need to be inherent in the process and SPC along with other advanced quality tools are absolutely necessary to achieve this. There is no such thing as cost of quality – the cost is non quality. The baseline should be 100% quality with any deviation adding cost not the other way around. - 40,000 feet – refer to above. I would rather be in a plane where quality was inherent in the process rather than where it had been inspected in!! - Low volume production – use different tools and focus on process & machine capability rather than traditional part number/feature based analysis. - tight tolerances – result of caution and not understanding manufacturing capability – KC process - CAA – who say’s? Aerospace quality standards EN9100 promote SPC (EN9103)
21
Aerospace SPC Some products are low volume......................but
There are lots of repeated features on a large component Rib 2 Many parts are very similar and made using the same process Rib 1 Rib 3 Rib 4 Focus on process and machine capability as well as product. The solution is to carefully group characteristics, products & processes and use the correct SPC Tools.
22
Aerospace SPC But, long runs and high volume do exist!
Some elementary parts are produced in high quantities Blades Stringers Ribs Fastenings… Lots of Key manufacturing processes are long run or continuous Drilling Bath treatments Painting
23
Process Qualification
Aerospace SPC - New Processes - High Risk Process Qualification - New Machines - Metrology systems Equipment Selection - Knowledge transfer - Tolerance validation - Statistical Tolerancing! DFM SPC Tools & Techniques - Waste Reduction - Cost Reduction - Process Optimisation Process Improvement - Identification of critical process parameters - Preventative/early warning control Process Control
24
Fuselage Assembly Improvement Project Airbus France (St Nazaire)
Example Project SPC Case Study Fuselage Assembly Improvement Project Airbus France (St Nazaire) Presented by: Eric Leblais Assembly Structures SPC Integration Leader
25
Process Overview Contact zone Contact zone joggling
26
Process Overview Contact zone Contact zone Wedges are inserted between the Keel beam, front lower and rear lower fuselage sections. Wedges Wedges
27
Process Overview BEFORE
28
Improvement Opportunity
Non-Value Adding process steps Additional cost & assembly time
29
SPC Analysis LSL USL Cp = 2.7 Cpk = 2.3 Proved Straightness and Joggling Process was Capable & Consistent. Proved that Wedges & Shimming process were not needed.
30
Action Implemented Process Steps Removed AFTER Assembly time reduction
~ 10h !
31
Action Implemented Design Change Process Control AFTER
Lower fuselage of 15/21 section Design Change A new definition of the angles was required because of the removal of the joggling process. Process Control SPC Implemented for Lower fusalage section to monitor & control process
32
Results & Savings Money Gain 8 K€/MSN 8 MSN/month => 64 K€/month
Cancellation of the realization of joggling on the 8 angles. Cancellation of wedges machining. (32 per Aircraft) No more Gauging time. (~1h) No more drilling and adjusting of the wedges. (~ 7h) No more painting protection of wedges surfaces. (~1.5h) No more fettling corrosion on the critical zones. New feedback from the assembly to the design office. Money Gain 8 K€/MSN 8 MSN/month => 64 K€/month ROI = 3 MSN
33
Q&A Questions ? Ben Allister ben.allister@infodream.co.uk
Web: Ben Allister Questions ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.