Download presentation
1
Reward Systems and Legal Issues Overview
2
Reward Systems: Overview
Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans Reasons for Introducing CP Plans Possible Problems Associated with CP Selecting a CP Plan Putting Pay in Context Pay Structures
3
Traditional Pay Salary and salary increases are based on Position
Seniority
4
Contingent Pay (CP) Salary and salary increases are based on
Job performance Also called: Pay for Performance If not added to base pay, called: Variable pay
5
Reasons for Introducing CP (1)
Performance management is more effective when rewards are tied to results CP Plans force organizations to: Clearly define effective performance Determine what factors are necessary
6
Reasons for Introducing CP (2)
Supervisors and employees are better able to understand what really matters CP plans enhance employee motivation to accomplish goals that match organizational needs
7
Reasons for Introducing CP (3)
CP plans help to recruit and retain top performers CP plans project good corporate image
8
CP plans help improve motivation when:
Employees see clear link between their efforts and resulting performance (Expectancy) Employees see clear link between their performance level and rewards received (Instrumentality) Employees value the rewards available (Valence) motivation = expectancy x instrumentality x valence
9
Possible Problems Associated with CP
Poor performance management system Rewarding counterproductive behavior (Rewarding A while hoping for B) Rewards are not considered significant Managers are not accountable (The reward becomes the driver) Extrinsic vs. intrinsic motivation Disproportionately large rewards for executives
10
Selecting a CP Plan: Issues to consider
Culture of organization Strategic direction of organization
11
A. Culture of organization: Types of organizations
Traditional Top-down decision making Vertical communication Jobs that are clearly defined Involvement Shared decision making Lateral communications Loosely defined roles
12
CP systems for different organizational cultures:
Traditional organizations Piece rate Sales commissions Group incentives Involvement organizations Profit sharing Skill-based pay
13
B. CP Plans to enhance Strategic Directions:(1)
Employee development Skill-based pay Customer service Competency-based pay Gainsharing Overall profit Executive pay Profit or stock sharing
14
B. CP Plans to enhance Strategic Directions:(2)
Productivity Individual Piece rate Sales commissions Teamwork Team sales commissions Gainsharing Competency based pay Group Gainsharing Group incentives
15
Putting Pay in Context A reward increases the chance that
Specific behaviors and results will be repeated, or Employee will engage in new behavior and produce better results
16
Rewards can include: Pay Recognition Status Time Trust & Respect
Public Private Status Time Trust & Respect Challenge Responsibility Freedom Relationships
17
How to Make Rewards Work
Define and measure performance first and then allocate rewards Only use rewards that are available Make sure all employees are eligible Rewards should be both Financial Non-financial (continued)
18
How to Make Rewards Work (continued)
Rewards should be: Visible Contingent Timely Reversible
19
Pay Structures Job Evaluation Broad-banding
20
Pay Structures An organization’s pay structure Classifies jobs
Into categories Based on their relative worth Is designed by job evaluation methods
21
Job Evaluation Method of data collection Consideration of
Determine the worth of various jobs Create a pay structure Consideration of KSAs required for each job Value of job for organization How much other organizations pay
22
Types of job evaluation methods:
Ranking Classification Point
23
Job evaluation methods: Ranking
Create job descriptions Compare job descriptions Rank jobs
24
Advantages of using Ranking method
Requires little time Minimal effort needed for administration
25
Disadvantages of using Ranking method
Criteria for ranking may not be clear: Distances between each rank may not be equal
26
Job evaluation methods: Classification
A series of classes or grades are created Each job is placed within a job class
27
Advantages of using Classification method
Jobs can be quickly slotted into structure Employees accept method because it seems valid
28
Disadvantages of using Classification method
Requires extensive time and effort for administration Differences between classification levels may not be equal
29
Job evaluation methods: Point method
Identify compensable factors (job characteristics) Scale factors (e.g. on a scale of 1 – 5) Assign a weight to each factor so the sum of the weights for all factors = 100%
30
Advantages of using Point method
Establish worth of each job relative to all other jobs within organization Comprehensive measurement of relative worth of each job in organization Easy to rank jobs when total points are known for each job
31
Disadvantages of using Point method
Requires extensive administrative Time Effort
32
Does job evaluation method matter?
Fairness Evaluators Impartial Objective
33
Compensation surveys Information on
Base pay All other types of compensation Conducted in-house or by consultants, such as: or
34
Broad-banding Most commonly used pay structure Pay structure collapses job classes into fewer (≤ 5) categories
35
Advantages of Broad-banding
Provides flexibility in rewarding people Reflects changes in organization structure Provides better base for rewarding growth in competence Gives more responsibility for pay decisions to managers Provides better basis for rewarding career progression
36
Reward Systems: Summary
Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans Reasons for Introducing CP Plans Possible Problems Associated with CP Selecting a CP Plan Putting Pay in Context Pay Structures
37
Legal Issues: Overview
Performance Management and the Law Some Legal Principles Affecting PM Laws Affecting PM
38
Performance Management and the Law
Performance management systems are legally sound, if they are fair: Procedures are standardized Same procedures are used with all employees
39
Some Legal Principles Affecting PM: Overview
Employment-at-will Negligence Defamation Misrepresentation Adverse Impact Illegal Discrimination
40
Employment relationship can be ended at any time by
Employment-at-will Employment relationship can be ended at any time by Employer Employee Exceptions Implied contract Possible violation of legal rights
41
Negligence If organization documents describe a system and It is Not implemented as described, Employee can challenge evaluation, charging negligence
42
Defamation Disclosure of performance information that is Untrue and Unfavorable
43
Misrepresentation Disclosure of performance information that is Untrue and Favorable
44
Adverse Impact / Unintentional Discrimination
PM system has unintentional impact on a protected class Organization must demonstrate: Specific KSA is a business requirement for the job All affected employees are evaluated in the same way Organization should review ongoing performance score data by protected class to implement corrective action as necessary
45
Illegal Discrimination or Disparate Treatment
Raters assign different scores to employees based on factors that are NOT related to performance Employees receive different treatment as result of such ratings Employees can claim they were intentionally and illegally treated differently due to their status
46
Employee claim of illegal discrimination:
Direct evidence of discrimination, or Evidence regarding the following: Membership in protected class Adverse employment decision Performance level deserved reward/different treatment How others were treated (not in protected class)
47
Employer response to claim of illegal discrimination
Legitimate and non-discriminatory reason for action Related to performance Note: Good performance management system and subsequent performance-related decision, used consistently with all employees, provides defense
48
Difference between legal and illegal discrimination
LEGAL discrimination discriminates among employees based on their level of performance ILLEGAL discrimination is based on variables that should not usually be related to performance
49
Laws Affecting PM: During past few decades, several countries have passed laws prohibiting discrimination based on: Race or Ethnicity Sex Religion National Origin Age Disability status Sexual orientation
50
Laws in the United Kingdom:
Equal Pay Act of 1970 Race Relations Act of 1976 Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 Disability Discrimination Act of 1995 Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003
51
Laws in the United States of America
Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (as amended in 1986) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
52
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
Organization: The system is formally explained and communicated to all employees The system includes a formal appeals process Procedures are standardized and uniform for all employees within a job group The system includes procedures to detect potentially discriminatory effects or biases and abuses in the system
53
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
Management Supervisors are provided with formal training and information on how to manage the performance of their employees Performance information is gathered from multiple, diverse, and unbiased raters The system includes thorough and consistent documentation including specific examples of performance based on first-hand knowledge
54
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
Employees Performance dimensions and standards are: Clearly defined and explained to the employee, Job-related, and Within the control of the employee Employees are given Timely information on performance deficiencies and Opportunities to correct them Employees are given a voice in the review process and treated with courtesy and civility throughout the process
55
Legal Issues: Summary Performance Management and the Law
Some Legal Principles Affecting PM Laws Affecting PM
56
Quick Review Reward Systems Legal Issues
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.