Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Fourth Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Stockholm 23 September 2001 P Eerola 1 Investigation of the decays B 0 d,s -> J/ in the ATLAS experiment at the LHC C. Driouichi, P.Eerola, Lund M. Melcher, F. Ohlsson-Malek, S. Viret, Grenoble
2
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 2 Physics background Decays B 0 s ->J/ , B 0 s ->J/ (’), B 0 s ->D + s D - s are analogous, but up to now, only the first one has been studied Advantages of B 0 s ->J/ no angular analysis needed since the final state is a CP eigenstate (V-PS) Cross-check of the decay mode B 0 s ->J/ CP asymmetry: in the Standard Model, the CP asymmetry is predicted to be theoretically ”clean”, but very small, where sin C, C is the Cabibbo angle, is the heigth of the Unitarity Triangle, and is one of the angles of the UT.
3
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 3 Measurements Branching ratio Decay is not yet observed, exp. upper limit BR<3.8 10 -3 B s lifetime and other parameters If large CP violation is observed => New Physics! For example, LR-symmetric models with spontaneous CP violation predict CP asymmetry O(40%)[Ball, Fleischer] (SM: 4%) BR predictions: BR=(8.3-9.5) 10 -4 [Skands]. Uncertainty from ’ mixing. Direct measurement of angle using B s and B d decays to J/ ?
4
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 4 J/ reconstruction J/ -> selected with p T ( 1)>5 GeV, p T ( 2)>3 GeV => passes level-1 and level-2 triggers efficiency: 85% for 1 (incl. level-1 and reconstruction in muon spectrometer), 78% for 2 (incl. Reconstruction in muon spectrometer and tilecal). Fake rate is very small. J/ reconstruction: vertexing with 2 /NDF 250 m => mass res. 39 MeV, rec. eff. 79%.
5
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 5 reconstruction -> reconstruction in the ATLAS LAr calorimeter: cell size 0.025x0.025 ( x ) in the second sampling layer further selection: cuts on energy sharing in the 3 ECAL layers and HCAL cluster width energy containment in the 3x3 window => mass resolution 35 MeV, efficiency 2.3%, background 28% energy resolution ( (E)/E) 2 =(0.10/sqrt(E)) 2 + (0.01) 2 (E in GeV) clusterization of 3x3 cells with 1 GeV threshold => if E( ) photon lost => if opening angle two clusters merge to 1 => rejected 20% of -> retained
6
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 6 B 0 s,(d) reconstruction J/ and candidates combined, using mass constraints. (B 0 s,d )= 67 MeV.
7
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 7 Results for 30 fb -1 P =-10 o P =-20 o BR(B s ->J/ )8.3 10 -4 9.5 10 -4 N(B s ) observed8 5009 700 BR(B d ->J/ )4.1 10 -6 1.6 10 -6 N(B d ) observed20080 N(background)10 800 Background considered: b->J/ X Clear B s signal B d CANNOT be observed
8
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 8 CP asymmetry Events need to be tagged as B or anti-B Use jet-charge tagging with 57% efficiency, 37% wrong-tag fraction Fit: where D is dilution from background and wrong tags. (sin M ) = 0.27 (x s = m s / s =19), 0.31 (x s =30) Only very large asymmetries can be observed
9
23 Nov 2001 P Eerola 9 Comparisons and conclusions Simple estimates: B-factories PEPII, KEKB cannot produce B s Tevatron 2 fb-1: CDF 190 B s ->J/ LHC ATLAS 30 fb-1: 9700 B s ->J/ LHC LHCb 10 fb-1: 260 000 B s ->J/ , 2150 B d ->J/ ATLAS can see a clear signal of B s ->J/ , measure BR and other parameters: measurement and cross-check. Note ISN-01.68, LUNDF6/(NFFL-7198)2001 submitted for publication. Improve statistics by investigating -> (BR=23%) improve efficiency by better use of the fine granularity of the first ECAL sampling (cluster fine structure)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.