Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H."— Presentation transcript:

1 Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H. Caldas

2 Cooling of neutron stars by "angulon" annihilation Light element envelope Heavy element envelope Geminga Vela Neutron stars start their lives hot and cool down by neutrino and photon emission After a minute, degenerate Cooling curves depend on emissivity, specific heat, thermal conduction, etc … Determined by low-lying excitations Unique laboratory to learn about dense matter Page et al.

3 Neutron pairing in the 3 P 2 channel for densities higher than nuclear saturation most attractive channel traceless symmetric matrix

4 D ij real (favored close to T c ) D determined by an orthonormal frame + 2 eigenvalues D eigenvalues are roots of 1

5 Symmetry (breaking) pattern tensor/spin-orbit discrete tensor/spin-orbit approximate exact 4 exactly massless Goldstone bosons

6 angulons Ripples in the sea of frames = angulons Contrary to other excitations, not exponentially suppressed by Boltzman factors, dominate low energy/temperature properties Couples to neutrino through neutral currents Dimensional analysis:

7 Effective theory For E << D 0 : phase spin rotation orbital rotation Matching to a simple "microscopic" theory

8 Rate for angulon+angulon No rotation symmetry: big complicated mess w = v k enhancement on the number of angulons ~ (T/v) 3 suppression due to E ~ v suppression due to kinematical constraint (no decay with v=0) suppression on the coupling ~ v

9 Does it matter for cooling ? Above T c no: (modified) Urca N+N N+N+l+      Below T c maybe: e+e e+e+        But pair formation around T c on a shell ~ 10 20 T 9 7 A more detailed study is probably necessary

10

11 Pairing in asymmetrical superfluids Two fermion species: A and B up and down quarks, two different atoms or hyperfine states in a trap, … different Fermi surfaces, pairing ?

12 Relevance for neutron (quark) stars, atomic traps renewed the interest on the problem: some new, interesting suggestions for the ground state Variational arguments can rigorously show what is NOT a ground state

13 To make it concrete: mean-field, low density, D / m <<1 Bogoliubov transformation:

14 slightly different problem: m A and m B fixed: minimize H- m N Fill states with negative E k b BCS filled with B

15 mA=mBmA=mB 1 st order transition m B - m A =2 D

16 In the real problem n A and n B are fixed: local maximum (Sarma state) suggested as the ground state (Liu &Wilczek, gapless superconductor)

17 Mixed state: minimize Which is smaller: E MIXED or E SARMA ? normal fraction

18 Sarma=BCS=Mixed Sarma mixed Sarma=normal E MIXED < E SARMA

19 In atomic traps, bubbles can be imaged. Long sought evidence for superfluidity in fermionic atomic traps ? Different dispersion relations (relativity) don’t change anything Three flavors is (may be) different !


Download ppt "Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google