Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Baroclinic Instability in the Denmark Strait Overflow and how it applies the material learned in this GFD course Emily Harrison James Mueller December 2, 2005
2
North Atlantic
3
The Overflow The East Greenland Current: -warm, light upper layer -cold, dense bottom layer The warm flow stays on the surface of the Irminger Sea The dense flow descend the East Greenland continental slope and enters the Denmark Strait
4
The Denmark Strait
5
Thin line: typical overflow density profile Thick line: mean back ground density Density Profile In the DS
6
Temperature, Salinity, and Density
7
Temperature, Velocity Magnitude and Direction Time Series for CM3
8
The Model Uniform cross-section Constant bottom slope, α Layer 1: ρ 1, U 1, average depth D 1 Layer 2: ρ 2, U 2, average depth D 2 Interface: φ(x,y,t) Channel Walls: ±L/2
9
Stability Analysis: Scaling
10
Stability Analysis: Parameters Rossby # Beta Effect Ekman # Internal Froude # Friction Parameter Bottom Slope Parameter Layer Depth Ratio
11
Physical Constants Dimensionless Parameters Observational Parameters
12
Does β-effect really matter here? β is O(10 -3 ) B=.346 Topographic effect is 2 orders of magnitude greater than β-effect Conclusion: NO!
13
Stability Analysis: Governing Equations
14
Stability Analysis: Boundary Conditions 1. @ 2. @ 3. @ 4. @
15
Stability Analysis: Governing Equation
16
Perturbation Pressure Equations with Boundary Conditions at y=±.5
17
Solving the Equations The eigenfunctions for the pressure perturbation equations: Where: the modes: the downstream wavenumber: k complex amplitude ratio: complex phase speed:
18
Solving the Equations Substituting ψ back into the equations yields an equation of the form: Which lead to a solution for c of the form: Where the coefficients are very, very messy -but are functions of k, m, F, β, γ, r, U 1, B
19
Solving the Equations With the complex coefficient components : The solution to the linear stability problem is complete! With:
20
Model: Instability Results Assumed: -inviscid -U 1 =0 Flow is Unstable if: B -1 >1 This means : -the shear is greater than geostrophic velocity -or, interface slope is greater than bottom slope
21
If λ =200km, B -1 =2.5, how long does it take the amplitude to increase by a factor of 10?
22
Mooring Array Spacing: ~ 15km With: Does the Mooring Array Resolve the Internal Rossby Radius of Deformation?
23
Theory Thermal wind:
24
Theory Stretching and squeezing of water columns Increase of relative vorticity (i.e. eddies) from potential energy Initial disturbance If unstable, eddies interact and form larger eddies Decrease of kinetic energy from friction Conservation of potential vorticity
25
Necessary Condition for Instability 1. Either changes sign in the domain, or 2. the sign of is opposite to that of at the top, or 3. the sign of is the same as that of at the bottom
26
Density Sections Northern lineSouthern line
27
Spectral Analysis
28
Coherence of Velocity
29
Coherence of Cross-stream Velocity
30
North-South Coherence
31
Heat Flux
32
Conclusions Linear, unstable baroclinic wave model predicts low frequency variability and cross-stream phase relationships Waves seem to be coherent only south of the sill Nonlinear effects are significant and thus need to be examined
33
Spall and Price (1998) Eddy diameter ~ 30 km separated by 70 km Period ~ 2-3 days which is close to Smith’s value of 1.8 days Mesoscale variability is considerably stronger than in other overflows Isopycnals are nearly parallel with the bottom, which implies the ratio of slopes is roughly 1 (i.e. not unstable). Therefore, baroclinic instability does not seem to be the primary process
34
Girton and Sanford (2001)
36
The Outside Sources
37
Hoyer, Quadfasel, Andersen 1999
38
Girton and Sandford 2003
39
Spall and Price 1998
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.