1. Chiba Univ. Haruo ASOSHINA Hokkaido Univ. Maiko KOSAKA Hokkaido Univ. Masako SUZUKI CURATOR Chiba University’s Repository & HUSCAP Hokkaido University ’s Repository

2. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 2 Chiba University Faculty 1,200 Staff 1,300 Undergraduate Students 12,000 Graduate Students 3,500 Undergraduate Programs –Letters, Education, Law & Economics, Science, Engineering, Pharmaceutical Science, Nursing Science, Horticulture, Medicine Graduate Programs(Master’s and Doctoral) –Humanities, Education, Social Science, Science and Technology, Medical and Pharmaceutical Science –Law School 1 University Hospital 12 Research Centers http://www.chiba-u.ac.jp/e/

3. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 3 Chiba University Library http://www.ll.chiba-u.ac.jp/ Main Lib & 2 branchs Collection 1,500,000 Circulation/year 148,000 ILL /year 10,000

4. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 4 Our IR : CURATOR Name ： CURATOR Chiba University's Repository for Access to Outcomes from Research Contents ： 800- records, so far System ： self-developed(Not using open source softwares) OS:Linux DB:Oracle Registration ： OAI data provider, IAR (Institution Archives Registry) URL http://mitizane.LL.chiba-u.jp/curator/

5. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 5 CURATOR: Status System  ’03 Prototype (‘-05) Independent system 1Ghz, 1GB, 80GB Dell  ’06- Enforce for “actual release” 3GHz, 2GB,RAID5(1TB) Dell Team  IR WG young staff(6) & Div. Manager(1)  Mainly in charge of System & serials section (2)  Committee of Info. dissemination Faculty & lib. Managers (10) Cooperation PR on/off campus  Presentation for faculties each campus & unit  Web Site  Symposium (Sep. ’05) What is IR, What is CURATOR.  Domestic CSI (18 univ. consortia for developing IR) Harvested Junii (National GW)  International OAI, IAR Scirus as well as T-Space Google

6. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 6 CURATOR: Number of records  Three quarters depending on “digitized bulletins” (batch-loaded)  Intend to advocate all faculties by presentation and pamphlet, but very few responsed.  Very few (Green) journal articles submitted.  Cooperation with “ Faculty accomplishment system ” (semi-automatically catch articles)  Not believe and not rely on self-archiving. We(library)“find and gather anything”  Not intend to advocate all faculties OA. Negotiation with “targeted customers”.  Anyway, break and try new route as above. Expected (Dec.’06) total over 7,500 Now (Dec.’05) total 827

7. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 7 CURATOR:Faculties’ contribution How many articles do our faculties submit to CURATOR? Now (Dec.’05) Expected (Dec.’06)  Miserable…  I hope at least like this…

8. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 8  Anyway, we need content, content, content.  For the moment, our basic interest is only “how do we make our IR richer with contents, rather reasonably and automatically? “  1. Finish the past (digitizable paper) ASAP. Like complete jigsaw.  2. Break several routes to collect “present & future” (digital version) rather than SA. CURATOR:Future

9. Hokkaido Univ. Chiba Univ. Location Researchers 2,123 Undergraduate students 11,299 Graduate students 6,250 Established in 1876 as Sapporo Agricultural College ( 札幌農学校 )

10. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 10 HUSCAP Hokkaido University collection of scholarly and academic papers DSpace1.2.1 100 researchers 150 papers - peer-reviewed: 100 - hit: 18,300 times Jul. 2005 ～ Feb. 2006 trial HASKAP （ berry ）

11. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 11 HUSCAP http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/

12. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 12 Before HUSCAP (1/2) WG (all librarians) started in June 2004 Researcher’s survey on OA practice in Nov. to inform researchers of OA, IR…, and to understand researcher’s needs for IR –Responded 466(22%) of 2142 faculty Agree with OA 421(91%) (51 already practiced) Agree with IR 328(70%) Agree to discuss with library about OA and IR 168 –No one knows about IR

13. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 13 Before HUSCAP (2/2) March 2005 ～ May 2005 Campus-use only Uploaded by researchers themselves Request to 168 researchers to upload their papers in the list of green papers made by library from WoS 30 researchers, 50 papers however 26 of them were pub. pdf Interview （ →mostly, Author’s ver. files lost ） “Hokkaido Univ. Academic Repository”

14. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 14 HUSCAP World wide access Uploaded by librarians Researchers email papers by attached files Receive researcher’s submission at the same time as the journal r ather than upload past papers retrospectively Change the way of approach to researchers –Before ： IR, OA, serial crisis, strictly –Now ： Digital Library Collection with a function of IR and OA

15. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 15 Which to emphasize? Library collection development Accountability as a public- funded research organization Visibility, Research Impact To researchers To executives Inside library Hokkaido University To researchers To executives Inside library Chiba University To researchers To executives Inside library Keio University

16. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 16 Present policies Committee to discuss the IR matters (established since Nov. 2005) –Consists of 9 researchers, 1 official and 1 librarian Requesting cooperation from the Departments –Digital theses project –Online Departmental Bulletin Project Effective public relations –Presentation to researchers, posters, leaflets, etc.

17. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 17 For researcher’s understanding Explanatory meeting to researchers 28 times –Librarians went to lab to explain –Announcements by posters, leaflets, newsletters –110 researchers attended the meetings Researcher Interview 20 times –Lunch meeting, seminar, individual appointment –Librarians went to researcher’s workplaces to explain Good for understanding about HUSCAP. But NOT a cost-effective method and too slow!

18. 1-2. DEC. 2005meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ. 18 Problems for the future Obtaining more recognition by researchers –What is the cost-effective method? Cooperating with “Research Achievements Database Hokkaido Univ.” –Is it possible to manage researchers information using DSpace? –Whether to include metadata without full text

19. Presentation finished