Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Rethinking Remittances Steven Vertovec University of Oxford & ESRC Research Programme on Transnational Communities
2
Rethinking Remittances 1. Some facts and trends 2. Patterns of remittance 3. Impacts: economic 4. Impacts: social & cultural 5. Conclusion
3
World Totals - Workers’ Remittances (million $ US) source: International Monetary Fund
4
Workers’ Remittances - selected Countries (million $ US) source: World Bank, International Monetary Fund
5
For Example... El Salvador: greatest relative economic impact in Latin American and Caribbean – remittances estimated at $1.3 billion, but – economy is only $9.5 billion – remittances account for approximately 13 per cent of the economy – exceed the major exports and foreign assistance – up to one-third of families receive remittances
6
Who sends remittances? Sent by entire spectrum of migrants: – legal/illegal – permanent/temporary – upper-class/working class – middle-aged/young – married/single – male/female Changes per length of stay, stage of life
7
Sent to Whom? Overwhelmingly, Family… But divergent patterns of reception: e.g., Bridget Anderson’s research on female migrant domestic workers: – Among 83 women from four nationalities – Only 2 sent money back to husbands (most sent to mothers, sisters, daughters) – “The response was absolutely clear and ‘transnational’: men are not to be trusted.”
8
Sending Remittances Firms used by migrants in the USA to transfer money – 43,000 outlets; 36 million transfers in 1996 – ($29.6 billion remitted out of USA in 1996) – average amount remitted: $320 – use variable exchange rates; pay transfers in currencies of country of destination – may skim off around 20 per cent, rather than the often advertised commissions of less than 7 per cent
9
Sending Remittances (cont’d) Remittance Means: – Formal government schemes (e.g. bonds) – Checks, money orders, electronic transfers – Couriers, post, carry by self, friends, family – In-kind (clothes, consumer goods) Means tends to vary by national group – e.g., Salvadoreans: small couriers Dominicans: remesadores Mexicans: money orders & wire
10
Presumed Negative Effects Displaces local jobs, income Induces consumption spending High import content of consumption Inflates local prices of land, housing, food Creates disparity, envy between recipients and non-recipients Creates dependency
11
Estimated ‘multiplier’ effects of migradollars on production in Mexico (source: Durand, Parrado and Massey 1996) Landless Rural Worker Small Farmer Unskilled Urban Worker Skilled Urban Worker Total Millions of US$ remitted 1990 554626667182,000 Effect on Production in Agriculture 567656224851,739 Petroleum 30331 95 Manufacturing 468534994911,511 Services 591586106391,898 Commerce 403434284041,278 Total$2,059$222$2,190$2,050$6,521
12
Wider Impacts Community level: – normative transmigration – Building new districts – Local markets more frequent – Hospitals, mosques, schools, orphanages, health clinics, sports facilities – Development: e.g potable water projects – Sustain war effort / perpetuate conflict – More beer! Festivals and celebrations
13
Wider Impacts (cont’d) Restructuring local status hierarchies – class, reputation: family and group Stimulating religious fervour / ritual activity Altering consumer tastes, styles, expectations Transforming gender relations Costlier weddings, inflated dowries ‘transmigrants get the nicest girls’ [& boys!] (Riccio 1999) – reshaping marriage patterns
14
Conclusion Must understand ‘transnationalizing’ of social, cultural, economic and political life – remittance represents not just finance, but the global ‘stretching’ of: household decision-making family life course and strategies collective resources social structure / cultural institutions community activities and development – each case highly conditioned by context(s)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.