1. CF3Br Data handeling agust,heima,....CF3Br/Sept-10/PXP-150910ak.pxp : agust,heima,....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xls agust, www,......cf3br/PPT-150910ak.ppt

2. CF3Br daterangecomment: ÁKfrá Kára hv(L, start)hv(L,stop)2hv(start)2hv(stop)comment: 9091020900209508360083800 9091020950210008380084000 10091020950209578380083828Br atom line 10091020890208978356083588Br atom line 10091020840208478336083388Br atom line 10091020450204808180081920 13091020560206108224082440mass peaks drift during scan KS: On that day, 13.09.10, we were having troubles with the peaks shifting back and forth and I fear that the laser 130910-220560206108224082440repeated; no drift of mass peaks power was not being monitored properly. None of the measurements were really adequate. 13091020600206508240082600mass peaks drift during scanP stabílt 130910-220600206508240082600repeated; slight drift of mass peaksP stabílt 13091020610205608244082240 does not scan as high masses asCF3 and Br+; slight drift of mass peaks 13091020650206008260082400slight drift of mass peaks? 14091020640206908256082760drift of mass peaksP stabílt 14091020650206008260082400 ? 14091020680207308272082920only slight drift of mass peaksP stabílt 14091020720207708288083080bad! Large drift of mass peaksP stabílt 14091020760207708304083080w(?) 15091020720207708288083080 15091020760208108304083240 P Stabílt 15091020800208508320083400 P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ 15091020840208908336083560 P0=7.5mJ; Pe= 6.5 mJ 15091020850208308340083320 P0=7 mJ, Pe=7.5 mJ 15091020890209108356083640 Stabílt agust,heima,....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xlsUpdated: 190910

3. Date / time of record 15.09 09.09 2hv / cm-1 Scan regions: agust,heima,....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.pxpUpdated: 170910 Start Stop 10.09 13.09 14.09

4. agust,heima,....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.pxp, Layout: 0, Graph:0, Table: 0Updated: 170910 Br lines (Br**( 2S+1 X J )<-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 ) Br lines See slide 5 ath 20560-20610

5. 2hv = 4 x hv(Laser) / cm-1 Int Integrated intensity of iBr+ signal vs 2hv NB! 1)Not corrected for Laser power 2) Includes “offset-bgr” agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-100910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 6, Graph: 10 1D-REMPI CF 3 Br; 100910ak Wave129 (81903.32 cm-1) Data file: 20450_20480 Updated: 170910 Br**( 4 P 5/2 )<-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 ) Br**( 4 P 3/2 ) <-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 )

6. Data 20560-20610 (130910), 2D-REMPI: hv(Laser) Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 0 Updated: 170910

7. hv(Laser) Mw CF3+ iBr+ Data 20560-20610 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 0 Clearly som Br+ signal

8. Data 20560-20610 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 7 CF3+ 2hv / cm-1

9. iBr+; i=79,81 Data 20560-20610 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout3, Graph: 9 2hv / cm-1 Br**( 4 D 3/2 )<-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 )

10. Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3 Updated: 170910

11. Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 5 CF3+ 2hv / cm-1

12. iBr+; i=79,81 Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout2, Graph: 7 2hv / cm-1 Br**( 4 D 3/2 )<-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 )

13. There is inconsistancy in terms of the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles 20560-20610 and 20560-20610-2 (see slides 8 and 11)

14. Data 20600-20650 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 3 Updated: 170910 Is CF2+ (50 amu) changing wih 2hv? Let´s check

15. Data 20600-20650 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 5 CF3+ 2hv / cm-1

16. Data 20600-20650-2 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2 Updated: 170910

17. Data 20600-20650-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 CF3+ 2hv / cm-1

18. There is a consistant drop in the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles 20600-20650 and 20600-20650-2 (see slides 15 and 17)

19. Data 20650-20600 (130910), 1D-REMPI : Updated: 170910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-170910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 4 CF3+ 2hv / cm-1

20. Now it is constant (slide 19)! This is inconsistant with the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles 20600-20650 and 20600-20650-2 (see slides 15 and 17) It might be worth comparing the CF3+ spectra with som impurity signals (C2+).. as a reference to see if analogous behaviour is seen for these. Kári (e-mail, 180910): On that day, 13.09.10, we were having troubles with the peaks shifting back and forth and I fear that the laser power was not being monitored properly. None of the measurements were really adequate. Now, these measurements over the region 20560-20650 might need to be redone in order to solve this inconsistency, but_ I suspect that the shifting of the peaks goes hand in hand with lower laser power._ And since the laser power wasn't being correctly monitored, a correction for the data can not be made. I remember being unsatisfied with the first measurement (20560-20610) due to shifting but continued with the next measurement (20600-20650) to see if the problem would solve itself, it of course did not. The region was then scanned back and forth with no progress until we were told to "ignore" the shift so we measured the regions again (20560-20610_2 & 20600-20650_2). But on the next day 14.09.10 we also measured 20650-20600 and there you have constant CF intensity vs 2hv. The measurement was much more stable after Wang had tuned the instruments a bit. Updated: 180910

21. Data 20650-20600 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 180910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 6 CF 3 + 2hv / cm-1

22. Data 20650-20600 (140910), Mass spectrum (wave157) : Mw Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 8 CF 3 81 Br 150 amu largest mass expected Unnecessary long scan!!!!!

23. Data 20640-20690 (140910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2 Updated: 190910

24. Data 20640-20690 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 4 CF 3 + 2hv / cm-1

25. Data 20680-20730 (140910; P Stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910

26. Data 20680-20730 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1

27. Data 20720-20770-bad (140910; P stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 7; Table:4(rempi2) Updated: 190910 NB: scale is incorrect

28. Data 20720-20770-bad (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 9 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1

29. Data 20720-20770 (150910; P stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910

30. Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1

31. Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 7 2hv / cm -1 Impurity: C2 +

32. Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 11 2hv / cm -1 Impurity: C +

33. Not possible to make a contour map of Data file 20760-20810; Y –axis resolution is low(?) NB: CF3+ signal shows intensity vs 2hv behavious which Differs from that of impurity signals (C+ and C2+)

34. Data 20760-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1

35. It seems to be that the CF3+ signal relative to the impurity signal varies between scans: See: PXP-180919ak.pxp PXP-190919aki.pxp; i =,a,b,c

36. Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 7 Data 20650-20600 (140910), Mass spectrum (wave0 – 251) : Mw

37. Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 5 Data 20720-20770 (150910),Mass spectrum (wave0 –249): Mw

38. Data 20800-20850 (150910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910 ?

39. Data 20800-20850 (150910), Mass spectrum (wave220) : Mw Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 ? iBr+ CF3+

40. Data 20800-20850 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 6 2hv / cm -1 79Br+ 83376.37 Br**( 2 F 5/2 ) <-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 )

41. Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 8 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1 NB!: laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2)

42. Data 20800-20850 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 10 2hv / cm -1 Unknown Mass: 83-84! 83376.37 cm-1 The wavenumber value tells us that this is a bromine atom (2+1)REMPI signal; the unusual TOF (mass) value suggests that this is a delayd Br atom signal. But is this 81Br+? Where is 79Br+ Most probably this is electronic oscillation effect(??)...but WHY?

43. Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 5, Graph: 12 2hv / cm -1 NB!: laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2) C2+; impurity

44. Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 6, Graph: 12 2hv / cm -1 NB!: laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2) C2+; impurity CF 3 +

45. Data 20840-20890 (150910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910 ?

46. Data 20840-20890 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 5 2hv / cm -1 79Br+ 83376.37 Br**( 2 F 5/2 ) <-<- Br*( 2 P 1/2 )

47. Data 20840-20890 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Updated: 190910 agust, heima,...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 7 CF 3 + 2hv / cm -1 NB!: laser power decreases as: P0=7.5mJ; Pe= 6.5 mJ (see slide 2)