Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical."— Presentation transcript:

1 New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, Yakutsk, Russia 2 Max-Planck-Institut f ü r Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany ksenofon@ikfia.ysn.ru The Multi-Messenger Approach to High Energy Gamma-ray Sources, Barcelona, July 4-7, 2006

2 The model: supernova explosion VpVp VsVs shock wave ejecta (piston) supernova CRs ISM: n H (~1 – 100 cm -3 ) T (~10 4 – 10 6 K) B 0 (~1 – 100 μG) SN: E SN (~10 51 erg) M ej (~1 M sun ) V p0 (~10 5 km/s) diffusive shock acceleration

3 The model: basic equations Hydrodynamic equations CR transport equations for protons and electrons CR pressure Injection term ρ(r, t) – gas density w(r, t) – gas velocity P g (r, t) – gas pressure f(p, r, t) – CR distribution function CR diffusion coefficient Synchrotron loss time

4 Völk et al. 2002, 2005 About 10% of the explosion energy has been transferred into CR energy up to now, which means that the CR energy content is E c = 0.1 E sn.

5 Distance determinations to Tycho’s supernova:  From the optical measurements d = 2.3 ± 0.8 kpc (Smith et al. 1991)  It is hard to escape from the uncertain range 2 – 4 kpc with the analyses done so far (Ruiz-Lapuente 2004) What’s new:  From the Chandra measurements Warren et al. (2005) estimate a mean ratio of contact discontinuity (ejecta) radius to blast wave radius as 0.93  Badenes et al. (2005) found that the properties of the X-ray emission are well reproduced by a 1D delayed detonation model with a kinetic energy of ~ 1.2 × 10 51 erg.

6 Qualitative estimate of gamma-ray flux In the Sedov phase - constant

7

8 3D Simulations by Blondin & Ellison (2001) Correction factor 1.05

9

10 The ratio of the radii of the contact discontinuity and the forward shock

11 Spectral energy distribution of the gamma-rays

12 Conclusions:  HEGRA Upper Limit is consistent with the distance 3.3 − 4 kpc  The expected π 0 -decay γ-ray energy flux is (2 − 5)×10 −13 erg/(cm 2 s)  The new Northern hemisphere IACT such as MAGIC, VERITAS will be able to detect Tycho’s SNR  TeV gamma-rays predominantly have hadronic origin  Detection of a TeV signal is also important for the correct determination of key Supernova parameters

13 Kepler’s SNR

14 Total (π 0 -decay + IC) integral γ-ray energy fluxes as a function of γ-ray energy for the same four cases as in Fig.1. For comparison, the respective sensitivities for a 5σ detection in one year with GLAST (Weekes 2003, Proc. 28th ICRC, 8, 3), and in 50 hours at 20º zenith angle for a photon index 2.6 (as for the Crab Nebula) with H.E.S.S. (Funk 2005, in PhD thesis), are shown.


Download ppt "New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google