1. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 Meeting of the LCLS Facilities Advisory Committee LCLS Project Management M. Reichanadter / SLAC

2. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 2 Outline Status of the LCLS Progress in the past six months Project Management Cost and Schedule Performance Contingency Allocation Organization and Integration Plans for the next six months Near-term Issues

3. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 LCLS Project Status Milestones Turner Awarded LCLS CM/GC Contract Oct17, ’05 Jacobs 100% design complete Jan17, ’06 CD-3B Approve Start of Construction – Mar28, ’06 DOE “Lehman” Review Feb 7-9, ’06 Cost Primary cost concern is the CF bids (delay CLOC bids) Cost estimate is ~agreed to by Jacobs & Turner Schedule Maintaining good schedule progress (adequate float) Critical path still runs through Conventional Facilities Management & Integration Preparation for construction on track (ISMS good) Procurements working reasonably well. Difficulty resolving CM/GC procedures and contract issues. Technical Specifications continue to mature. Good preparation (SLAC & LCLS) on FFTB and FY06 shutdowns

4. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 4 Project Performance (TEC) Planned work and obligations fall within the DOE funding profile. The goal of the PO is to manage LCLS work activities to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. Phase-fund construction contracts.

5. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 5 LCLS Feb06 CPR 24 months of reporting earned-value TPC ~22% Complete Contingency on ETC~28%

6. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 6 Recent Cost and Schedule Performance (TEC) Injector System:SPI = 0.84 – Laser delay (Thales), streak camera and RF gun fab. Linac System: SPI = 0.88, CPI = 1.25 – Inj- Lin controls hardware. Strong effort underway to recover schedule. SLAC-built X-band klystron which is under test. Undulator System: SPI = 0.88 – CMM and test stand deliveries. Airfreight to save schedule.

7. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 7 Contingency Performance Processed ~$2.4M return to contingency in Jan/Feb. Maintain ~27% contingency on WR until 1 st group of CF bids are in (May06).

8. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 8 Contingency Allocation (May05 – Present)

9. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 9 LCLS Project Schedule LCLS Critical Paths; Constr Start CLOC B.O. 111d (5-1/2 months) schedule float to CD-4 Constr Start Undulator B.O. Undulator Install ‘First Light” 213d (10-1/2 months) commissioning float to CD-4 Key schedule issues; Awarding construction contracts on time Technical component readiness for installation System integration needs good coordination Preparation for SLAC shutdowns also to be well-planned Apr06 FFTB Shutdown underway (~ 3-1/2 mos. prep for Turner) Aug06 SLAC Shutdown in planning (~4 mos. Install Injector + some Linac) Jul07 SLAC Shutdown in planning (~3 mos. Install Linac)

10. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 10 L3 Milestone Performance LCLS showing OK milestone performance over past six months. Coming up: -Drive Laser -Und SUT -Und 1 st Art -MMF -Shutdown

11. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 11 Awarded Contracts ~38% of LCLS contracts awarded. By end of FY06, 80% of contracts will be awarded. At that point, cost risk is down. Remaining contracts have some specialty components but most are commodities. (vacuum, cabling, etc.) Cost Risks CF subcontracts Schedule performance System Integration

12. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 12 Technical Specifications Status LCLS Specs PRD’s 37% Jul05 67% Oct05 85% Apr06 Nice improvement ESD’s particularly IN, LN, and UN need more effort. Recent physics support added to Photon System

13. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 13 LCLS Project Organization (Mar06) Feb06 Lehman committee recommended strengthening Project Office APD – Engr APD – Civil Procurement Continued strengthening of Conv Facilities LCLS PMOG functioning

14. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 14 Earned-Value Management Certification Status 4 major CAR’s 002 Work Authorization Documents 005 Indirect Cost Procedure 006 Indirect Rates 007 Change Control 4 minor CAR’s 001 Variance Analysis Reports 003 Scheduling Process & Linkage 004 Direct Costs not recorded with Budgets 008 Performance Measurement Baseline A Corrective Action Plan is in draft. Most require minor clarifications/additions to documentation Project plans a bottoms-up Estimate-To- Complete by Oct06. Roadmap to LCLS EVM Certification Sep05 – LCLS conducted an assessment of EVMS. Positive comments. Good recommendations. Mar1-2, ‘06 – LCLS to conducted an EVMS review using an external review team. Mar27-31 ‘06 – OECM EVM certification through DCMA.

15. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 15 Near-Term Issues Award construction sub-contracts and start construction SLAC to complete FFTB removal and RY demo work Finalize and bid out CLOC later to manage cost risk. SLAC-LCLS Procurement maintain change control with Turner Safety, safety, safety Lots of new hazards, construction, tunneling, demolition, installation, lasers, contractor coordination and shutdown activities Emphasize on ISM, UTR Training, strengthen line management System Engineering and Integration Strengthen Project Office staffing Maintain sensitivity to staffing shortages Document decisions via Technical Spec’s and Design Reviews Actively manage risks via the Risk Registry Continue performance on cost, schedule and milestones

16. Mark Reichanadter LCLS FAC Meetingreich@slac.stanford.edu April 20-21, 2006 16 Summary Good performance thus far (22% comp) SLAC is providing key resources to the project Overall cost and schedule performance is OK A/E ~complete, CM/GC ready for construction FFTB and shutdown planning underway Major technical deliverables well underway Laser, Undulators, etc. LCLS ISMS is a “pre-condition” for all work.