Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Numerical Modelling of Scraped Surface Heat Exchangers K.-H. Sun 1, D.L. Pyle 1 A.D. Fitt 2, C.P. Please 2 M. J. Baines 3, N. Hall-Taylor 4 1 School of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK 2 Faculty of Mathematical Studies, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK 3 Department of Mathematics, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK 4 Chemtech International Ltd, Reading, RG2 0LP, UK
2
Outline of Presentation Background and objectives Equations and boundary conditions Isothermal results Heat transfer results Conclusions
3
Background Scraped surface heat exchangers are widely used in the food industry for processing highly viscous, shear-thinning fluids (margarine, gelatine etc..).
5
Background The cold outer cylinder is scraped periodically by the blades to prevent crust formation and promote heat transfer. With a rotating inner cylinder, the flow is a superposition of Poiseuille flow in an annular space and a Couette flow. Typical flows are non-Newtonian with low Reynolds and high Prandtl numbers. Poor understanding of mechanisms: no rigorous methods for design, optimisation and operation.
6
Objectives - overall w Using asymptotic and numerical methods, to explore selected sub-problems relating to SSHE design and performance. w Asymptotics : simplified problems understanding Numerics: complex problems, effects of geometry etc
7
Schematic & Coordinate System (fixed to inner surface) Singularity here
8
Objectives – this study w FEM numerical modelling studies of two-dimensional steady problems : 1. Isothermal behaviour – effects of blade design 2. Local and integrated heat transfer & effect of: Blade design Power law index – i.e Shear thinning Heat thinning
9
Equations The non-dimensional form of the steady two- dimensional equations of an incompressible fluid are The frame of reference is rotating in the z direction: the Coriolis force term is added
10
Modifications to power law Viscosity (modified power law): m – typically ca. 0.33 – shear thinning b – heat thinning index c ensures that the viscosity is non-zero when I 2 approaches infinity at the singularity. In the stagnation areas, I 2 is monitored against a minimum value of 0.000001 to ensure that the viscosity is finite.
11
Dimensionless Groups Reynolds number Prandtl number Peclet number Brinkman number Nusselt number
12
FEM solution procedure All problems were solved using FASTFLO, a commercial FEM solver. The isothermal flow was solved using the FEM augmented Lagrangian method; the iterative procedure for Newtonian fluid was For the non-isothermal condition: 1. The velocity was solved by assuming a fixed temperature field 2. Then the temperature field was solved from the known velocity 3. The procedure was repeated until a converged velocity and temperature was reached.
13
Problem 1 :Isothermal case Boundary conditions: zero slip all surfaces Streamlines, stagnation line, pressure distribution etc Effect of shear thinning (“m”) Effect of blade design: flow gap, angle:
14
Mesh – Isothermal problem (Straight blades) The mesh has 10128 nodes and 4724 6-node triangle elements It is concentrated along the blades and the tip of the blades. Singularity at tip: add 2% “tip gap” with at least 5 mesh points
15
Streamlines-- Effect of gap size with angled blade (AB) Re = 10 m=1.0 (Newtonian) 0% gap20% gap60% gap m=0.33 (Shear Thinning) 0% gap20% gap60% gap
16
Streamfunctions: isothermal flow
17
Results: w Increasing gap removes stagnation zone upstream of blade w Increasing gap width shifts stagnation point downstream of blade w Increased shear thinning (i.e. lower m) shifts stagnation line
18
Problem 2: Heat transfer Boundary conditions Credibility check Temperature contours (straight blade) Heat flux at the wall: local and integrated Effect of shear thinning Effect of heat thinning Effect of blade design: gap, angle
19
Thermal boundary conditions
20
Credibility checks w Checked convergence etc with mesh size and configuration w Checked against analytical results for simplified problems (eg flow in annulus)
21
Temperature contours Re=10 Pr=10 Br=0.3, b=0.05 NEWTONIAN SHEAR THINNING m=1 m=0.33 0% gap 20% gap
22
Temperature profiles near the blade [Values = T-T wall ] Max Temp Max Temp
23
Effect of heat thinning on heat transfer Re=10 Pr=10 Br=1.0, b=0.0 or 0.1, 20% gap (T corresponds to b = 0.1 – ie heat thinning)
24
Effect of shear thinning and heat thinning on integrated heat transfer: Increasing “b” corresponds to increased heat thinning Re=10 Pr=10 Br=1.0, 20% gap (Straight blade)
25
Conclusions For a constant viscosity fluid the highest shear region is close to the blade tip; this gives rise to high viscous heating; the maximum temperature and heat flux areclose to the tip For shear thinning fluids, the viscosity is reduced in the high shear region, so viscous heating is reduced together with the heat flux (Nusselt number) The heat thinning effect is more significant for Newtonian fluids; it also further reduces viscous heating, local hot spots and the heat flux. .
26
Future work Address 3-D problem – in first instance by “marching 2-D” approach Address numerical problems at high Pr In parallel: analytical approach to selected sub- problems Produce solutions to engineering problems eg: Blade force and wear Power requirements & Heat transfer Mixing
27
Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge support from The University of Reading and Chemtech International.
28
Additional information
29
Conclusions – 1 - methodology The FEM method gives good agreement with analytical results where comparison is possible Results are robust to changes in mesh size etc A small (fictitious) gap between the tip and wall helps avoid numerical problems due to the singularity at the tip/wall intersection Need much finer mesh grid at very high Prandtl numbers
30
Conclusions - 2 The flow gap acts to: Release the stagnation area near the foot of the blades, Reduce the force on the blades and Shift the location of the centre stagnation point.
31
Effect of gap size on heat transfer (straight blade) Re=10 Pr=10 Br=0.3, b=0.05
32
Effect of power law index m on local heat transfer across cold surface Re=10 Pr=10 Br=0.3, b=0.05, 20% gap (straight blade) [m = 1: Newtonian; m < 1: Shear thinning]
33
Tangential flow in an annulus: comparison with analytical solution Re=10 Pr=10 Br=0.3, b=0.0 (no heat thinning) c-analytical value Velocity profile Nusselt number
34
Convergence Convergence The procedure was coded in fastflo (a commercial FEM PDE solver) For large power law index m>=0.4 For small power law index m<0.4
35
Mesh- thermal calculations The mesh has 14912 nodes and 6908 6- node triangles It is concentrated along the surfaces and on a line along the blades. There is a 2% gap at the tip with at least 5 mesh points
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.