Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.

Published by Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept

3 Judicial Nationalism The Constitution and Federal Law is superior to State Constitutions and State Law—Article VI of the Constitution The Supreme Court is the final arbiter on Constitutional Questions

4 Landmark Cases Marbury v. Madison—1803 Fletcher v. Peck— 1810 Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816); Cohens v. Virginia (1821) Dartmouth College v. Woodward—1819 McCulloch v. Maryland—1819 Gibbons v. Ogden-- 1824

Download ppt "John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept."

Similar presentations

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?
Who was John Marshall?  The Democratic-Republican victory in the 1800 election began a long run of Republican political success.  In spite of Federalists'

Who was John Marshall?  The Democratic-Republican victory in the 1800 election began a long run of Republican political success.  In spite of Federalists'
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Commerce Commerce Industry Industry State’s rights State’s rights.

Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Commerce Commerce Industry Industry State’s rights State’s rights.
The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.

The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.
In a series of Marshall Court decisions from 1816-1824, A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.

In a series of Marshall Court decisions from , A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Powers of the Federal Courts Introduction –What is the purpose of the Court system? To balance the power of the other two branches. –Who is Chief Justice.

Powers of the Federal Courts Introduction –What is the purpose of the Court system? To balance the power of the other two branches. –Who is Chief Justice.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 2- minute summary Summary This landmark case declared that the United States government had implied powers as well as those.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 2- minute summary Summary This landmark case declared that the United States government had implied powers as well as those.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
 Marbury v. Madison—the courts established the power of judicial review by limiting their own power.  John Adams, T. Jefferson, James Madison, William.

 Marbury v. Madison—the courts established the power of judicial review by limiting their own power.  John Adams, T. Jefferson, James Madison, William.
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.

JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.

Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.
Marbury v. Madison 1803 Case Decision Reason Significance

Marbury v. Madison 1803 Case Decision Reason Significance
Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.

Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.
Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)

Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)
AHSGE Supreme Court Cases. Brown v. Board of Education Ends segregation Overturns Plessy v. Ferguson.

AHSGE Supreme Court Cases. Brown v. Board of Education Ends segregation Overturns Plessy v. Ferguson.
1800-1804.  Marbury vs Madison  The Supreme Court can use Judicial Review –to rule on other branches of government.  McCulloch vs. Maryland-  Elastic.

 Marbury vs Madison  The Supreme Court can use Judicial Review –to rule on other branches of government.  McCulloch vs. Maryland-  Elastic.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google