Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Distribution of Fitness Effects of Mutations in Humans and Flies

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Distribution of Fitness Effects of Mutations in Humans and Flies"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Distribution of Fitness Effects of Mutations in Humans and Flies
Adam Eyre-Walker (University of Sussex)

2 Types of Mutation Deleterious Neutral Advantageous +ve -ve

3 Deleterious Mutations
accumulation and Mutagenesis expts dn/ds in primates <30% <10% 1/100 1/10,000

4 Distribution of Effects
deleterious neutral low high

5 Neutral sites (e.g. introns / synonymous)
Theory Neutral sites (e.g. introns / synonymous) Selected sites (e.g. non-synonymous) -assume all mutations neutral or deleterious

6 Simplication

7 Theory Neutral sites Parameters n - known Ln - each gene Ls- each gene
 - shared  - shared Estimation assume free recomb , ,  Bayesian estimation using MCMC Selected sites

8 Dataset - humans Environmental genome project 275 human genes
90 individuals resequenced 549 non-synonymous polymorphisms 15746 intron polymorphisms

9 Pn/Pi versus i Human Pn/Pi i

10 Results - human Shape = 0.28 Nes = 240 Nes 01 110 10100 1001000
100010000 % 23 22 37 19 0.1

11 Results - human Shape = 0.28 (0.03, 0.48) Nes = 240 (90, ) 01 110
10100 1001000 100010000 0.38 0.62 0.23 0.22 0.37 0.19 0.001 0.17 0.33 0.47 0.03 0.000

12 Low Frequency Polymorphisms
Cargill snps

13 Dataset - D.melanogaster
44 genes 5-55 alleles sequenced 141 non-synonymous polymorphisms 346 synonymous polymorphisms

14 Pn/Ps versus s D.melanogaster Shape = 0.46 (0.15, 0.65)

15 Adaptive Mutations

16 Human1 CCC GCA GAG TTA CTA ATC GAA Human2 CCG GCA GAG TTA CTA ATC GAA
Human3 CCC GCA AAG TTA CTA ATC GAA Human4 CCC GCA AAG TTA CTA ATC GAA Chimp CCC GCC GAG TTA GTA ATT GAA

17 Model Assume - synonymous mutations are neutral
- amino acid mutations are deleterious, neutral or advantageous

18 Estimation Parameters n, Ln, Ls - known without error  - each gene
 - shared, beta distributed or one per gene Estimation by ML

19 Drosophila 35 genes with multiple alleles in D.simulans and one allele in D.yakuba

20 Result  = 0.26 (0.08, 0.41)

21 Proportion Constant Model n Log(L) One  106 -327.5 Beta distributed
107 One  per gene 140 -302.9 Amino acid divergence in terms of aa subs per codon Gene Amino Acid Div Hsc70 0.0023 Adh 0.036 Est-6 0.20

22 D.simulans & D.yakuba 600,000 aa differences 26 % adaptive
1 every 75 years

23 Human-Chimp Environmental Genome Project 232 human genes
90 individuals resequenced Non-synonymous versus intron Human sequence aligned against chimpanzee genome

24 Human Nuclear Genes

25 Low Frequency Polymorphisms
Cargill snps

26 Dealing With Deleterious Mutations
Use estimate of distribution of fitness effects from SNP data Assume adaptive and slightly deleterious mutations governed by one distribution Ignore low frequency variants

27 Excluding SNPs Cutoff ML 95% CI 0% -0.62 5% 0.09 (-0.11, 0.26) 10%
(0.08, 0.41) 20% 0.31 (0.11, 0.52)

28 290,000 amino acid differences
Humans & Chimpanzees 1% 290,000 amino acid differences 25% adaptive 72,500 adaptive differences 1 every 165 years

29 Conclusions Distribution of fitness effects of slightly/moderately deleterious mutations is highly leptokurtic in humans and drosophila ~25% of amino acid substitutions are driven by positive selection in humans and drosophila Proportion does not vary between genes

30 Thanks Gwenael Piganeau Nick Smith Meg Woolfit Nicolas Bierne


Download ppt "The Distribution of Fitness Effects of Mutations in Humans and Flies"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google