1. 1 The Central Team Ryan Sawasaki Holger Keitel Joanna Lennartsson Lan Yu Ben Thompson Kevin Nadolny Linda Strömgren 1

2. 2 2

3. 3 4

4. 4 Flying Box 6

5. 5 7

6. 6 8

7. 7 9

8. 8 10

9. 9 Flying Box 11

10. 10 12

11. 11 Flying Box – 1st structural system - Floorplan - steel construction with pile foundation - concrete slab, use of composite beams N 13

12. 12 Flying Box – 1st structural system – Section A-A - perimeter MRF for lateral loads - use of base isolation to decrease lateral loads 14

13. 13 Flying Box – 2nd structural system - Floorplan - Cast in Place Concrete Construction 15

14. 14 17

15. 15 Boxes in Forest 19

16. 16 Boxes in Forest 20

17. 17 Boxes in Forest 21

18. 18 Boxes in Forest 22

19. 19 Boxes in Forest 23

20. 20 Boxes in Forest 24

21. 21 Boxes in Forest 26

22. 22 Boxes in Forest – 1 st Structural Concept - Reinforced concrete 29

23. 23 Boxes in Forest – 1 st Structural Concept - Reinforced concrete 30

24. 24 Boxes in Forests – 2nd structural design – Second Floor Plan - Cloumns and beams layout - “Forests“ location need to be adjusted 33

25. 25 Boxes in Forests – 2nd structural design – Third Floor Plan - Customize the elements - Eccentric center of stiffness 34

26. 26 Boxes in Forest – Auditorium - candilevered auditorium - truss construction, pile foundation N W 14x34 W 16x57 W 14x34 W 14x74 36

27. 27 Boxes in Forest – Auditorium - Roof - cable construction to reduce the steel amount - bay size is 50 ft W 14x26 W 16x57 cable 37

28. 28 Dry material storage Material storage Site offices Cranes Recycling area Access for workers – before morning transit Access for materials – least disturbing for on campus activities 38

29. 29 Structural System Cost Comparison – Concept 1 “Flying Box” Structural System Option Foundation CostFloor 1 CostFloor 2 Cost Floor 3 Cost Total Cost per C.I.P Beams$27,883$147,593 $125,851v$448,922 Precast Beams$27,883$229,920$202,036$180,294$640,135 Steel$118,583$253,850 $233,897$860,182 39 Construction permit fee Total permit fee is $ 108 000 Fees included in the estimate: fire hydrant fee, sewer fee, arts development fees, LAUSD developer fees, dwelling unit tax and utility connection.

30. 30

31. 31 Cooling Load Estimate “Rule of Thumb”: 1 Ton/400 SF Required Airflow: Main Duct Run: 40” f for low pressure –Equivalent to 76”x19”, 60”x24”, 37”x37” Horizontal Duct Run each floor: 28” f for low pressure –Equivalent to 29”x23”, 56”x14” 41

32. 32 Mechanical shaft sizing Mechanical room sizing 37” 18” min 6’-9” 5’-3” Say 2’ for access Plumbing AHU: 9.6’ x 28’ x 6.01’ high Hot Water heater Electrical Equipment 22’ 32’ Mech Room 32’x22’ = 704 SF Minimum area for mechanical shaft 6.75’x5.25’ = 35.5 SF 42

33. 33 HVAC System Conventional System Option Under-floor Passive Distribution System Option –Energy savings –Less ductwork –Easier maintenance 43

34. 34 Elevator Gen2™ with Remote Elevator Monitoring (REM ®) Excavation depth: 47” (1,2 m) below finished slab Top height: 138” (3,5 m) above top slab – space for mechanical and emergency operations Dimensions: Door opening = 38” (900 mm ) 66” x 99” (1670 x 2520 mm) including construction tolerance Costs: $50 000 (installation not included) 44 Low energy consumption Low speed Reduce need for maintenance by no switches, no gear-weel, no oil use. Only reusable components. Encourage usage of the stairs– fewer users – less mechanical wear

35. 35 Energy demand 45 Energy Demand –145 kBtu/SF for University Bldgs (1995 DOE Data)  1,300,000 kWh/year Peak Energy Demand –9.33 W/SF (75 th percentile 1995 DOE data) –With 4% annual growth: Total 2015 Peak Energy Demand = 500kW Reduce energy consumption Few large Air Handling Units Low speed Conformity regarding components

36. 36 Solar Energy Solar Supply = 12 W/SF –For 50% of roof area, max available solar energy = 180 kW, or 36% of estimated peak energy demand. @ $6/W, 500 kW of solar energy installed = $3,000,000, 42,000 SF!! @ $6/W, 180 kW of solar energy installed = $1,080,000 $3/W Rebate (CA Energy Commission) Total installed cost = $540,000 Energy savings as high as $25,000/year 46 Geothermal Energy Our site is not very suitable for geothermal energy Source: California Energy Commission “Preliminary Renewable Resource Assessment,” July 2003

37. 37 47 Other Green Concepts – LEED requirements Green Roof –Cut cooling costs 20-30% –Stormwater, aesthetics, acoustics Waste heat recovery Thermal storage in building mass Climate façade IR reflective coatings/paint Hybrid Solar Lighting Low-flow plumbing fixtures Grey-water recycling Storm water control – native plant landscaping Reusable materials Recycling Prefered use of bio-mass materials Low VOC Low contamination

38. 38 49

39. 39 Green funding 48 Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER)  California Energy Commission (solar energy) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (green roofs) Renewable Resources Trust Fund Emerging Renewables Program (solar energy )