Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
GETTING HISTORY INTO THE EQUATION Thoughts on Social Capital and on Social Science
2
General Background Systemic failures – Agency – third world development – Deregulation – transition in Eastern Europe – Oversight – global financial crisis Focus on institutions – New institutionalism, coherent theory – Not a “school” as such – No definition of “institutions”
3
History Matters Neoclassical economics – Forward looking instrumental rationality – History the carrier of institutions – Institutions matter – and history does not? Role of economic man – Veblen and chess computers – Anathema to sociology – Core conflict
4
Dealing with Specificity Seeming contradiction – All countries and peoples are the same – All countries and peoples are unique Which story to tell? – Economic man, background noise – When is uniqueness relevant? – Must theory be adjusted? Russia a “normal” country – Clouds the issue
5
Correlations over Time Inglehart et al. – Quality of economic performance – Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant traditions LaPorta et al. – Quality of government – Common, civil, socialist law Core problem – Correlations looking for explanations – Not all relations are causal relations
6
Demonstrating Causality Pathways of institutional reproduction – Rational choice vs. culture EU Catholics and Protestants – Pope was corrupt 500 years ago? – Hierarchical religion, corrupt politics Meiji restoration in Japan – Tokugawa, enemy within, xenophobia – Meiji, enemy without, close ranks
7
Turning to Economics Deductive modeling – Queen of social science (Comte) – Sociology, fiction and nonsense The transaction is a cultural thing – Habits, customs, beliefs, expectations – Legal, moral and social norms – Trust, values, guile Price of success – An ahistoric science – Hirschman, hands tied, not decode
8
Not Always the Case Kuhn, scientific revolutions – Winning paradigm, rewrite history – Neoclassical economics German historicism Inductive approach Political economy an historical science American institutionalism Influenced by historicism Orthodoxy in 1930s New institutional economics Broadly dismissive Nothing to be learned
9
The Scottish Enlightenment Core of the liberal tradition – Invisible hand, inherited – Kant, Mandeville Role of norms – Smith, Hume, Ferguson – Ethics, Arrow, Buchanan, North Role of intervention – Visible hand – Mandeville, Robbins …
10
The Free Market Social science neglects the market as such – Economics takes it for given – Sociology abandoned it to economics New economic sociology – Granovetter, embeddedness – Polanyi contradicted himself – Definitions plentiful and vague New institutionalism – Coherent approach?
11
Problems with Deductive Modeling Powerful track record – Nobel Prize in economics – “Economics imperialism” Predictive power – Restrictive assumptions Great Experiments – Tocqueville, systemic change, dislocations – Rules suspended (Przeworski) – “Natural experiments” and “great laboratory”
12
Methodology Marginal revolution – Methodological individualism – Trivially true (Elster) – Capstone of economics (Arrow) Methodological holism – Rejection of economic man – Embeddedness a replacement? – Richness of detail vs. power of prediction
13
Back to History Arguments abound that history matters – Historical economics (Kindleberger, Snooks) – Historical institutionalism (Pierson, Thelen) – Historical sociology (Mahoney) Challenges to methodological individualism – The whole greater than sum of the parts – Collective memories and norms – Public to private culture and norms
14
Social Capital Shorthand for the missing link – Instrumental rationality – Embedded norms Policy implications – Limits to agency – Handle evolution Overall – Need a theory of norms, human action
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.