1. Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi, Marcus Day

2. Accomplishments IFE Chamber dynamics code SPARTAN is developed: Simulation of Physics by Algorithms based on Robust Turbulent Approximation of Navier-Stokes Equations. SPARTAN current features: –2-D Navier Stokes equations, viscosity and thermal conductivity included –arbitrary geometry –adaptive mesh refinement SPARTAN tests: –Acoustic wave propagation. –Viscous channel flow. –Mach reflection. –Analysis of discretization errors to find code accuracy. Initial conditions from BUCKY code are used for simulations. Two Journal articles on SPARTAN are in preparation. IFE Chamber dynamics code SPARTAN is developed: Simulation of Physics by Algorithms based on Robust Turbulent Approximation of Navier-Stokes Equations. SPARTAN current features: –2-D Navier Stokes equations, viscosity and thermal conductivity included –arbitrary geometry –adaptive mesh refinement SPARTAN tests: –Acoustic wave propagation. –Viscous channel flow. –Mach reflection. –Analysis of discretization errors to find code accuracy. Initial conditions from BUCKY code are used for simulations. Two Journal articles on SPARTAN are in preparation.

3. Governing Equations of Fluid Flow 2-D Navier-Stokes equations in conservative form: Solution vector:

4. Governing Equations of Fluid Flow Flux terms in x and y direction:

5. Viscosity In general,  depends on (T, Z) T – temperature, Z – average ionization stage 2 extreme cases: neutral gas and fully ionized gas on a temperature range (10,000-60,000)K neutral gas: fully ionized gas: := (4.9 x 10 -11 – 4.4 x 10 -9 ) Pas := (2.6 x 10 -4 – 6.55 x 10 -4 ) Pas

6. Thermal Conductivity Thermal conductivity depends on (T, Z), as well as viscosity. 2 extreme cases: neutral gas and fully ionized gas on a temperature range (10,000-60,000)K neutral gas: fully ionized gas: := (6.2 x 10 -2 – 0.156) W/(mK) := (0.022 – 1.94) W/m-K

7. Godunov Method Introduced in 1959, as a finite volume method with a special method of upwinding. Uses solution to a 1-D Riemann problem in order to estimate fluxes at the interface between cells. Formulation of Riemann problem: 1-D governing equation initial condition U(x,0) does not necessarily satisfy the conservation laws, breaks into fans, shocks and contact discontinuities.

8. Godunov Method Solution procedure for Riemann problem uses Hugoniot jump relations and second law or thermodynamics to estimate pressure at the discontinuity, speed of propagation of discontinuities and the corresponding values of state variables. Numerical application: x u,t j j+1 j-1 wave diagram for Riemann problem u j+1 ujuj U j-1

9. Adaptive Mesh Refinement Motivation: efficient grid distribution results in reasonable CPU time. Grid organized into levels from coarse to fine. Solution tagging based on density and energy gradients. Grid is refined at every time step. Solution interpolated in space and time between the grid levels. Referenced in: Almgren et al., 1993. Motivation: efficient grid distribution results in reasonable CPU time. Grid organized into levels from coarse to fine. Solution tagging based on density and energy gradients. Grid is refined at every time step. Solution interpolated in space and time between the grid levels. Referenced in: Almgren et al., 1993. chamber beam channel wall

10. Example of Adaptive Mesh Refinement max min geometry density contour plot

11. “forbidden” domain fluid domain embedded boundary Embedded Boundary Algorithm Arbitrary geometry imposed onto regular grid. This results in formation of cells irregular in shapes and sizes. Conservative update of irregular cells needs to be consistent and stable.

12. Embedded Boundary Algorithm Conservative update of irregular cells, consistent with split formulation of governing equations: F west F east F south F north FBFB

13. Embedded Boundary Algorithm irregular cell cell for nonconservative update fluid domain irregular cell’s neighborhood non-conservative update preliminary update

14. Error Analysis Reflection of shock waves from the walls of cylindrical chamber was studied. Initial condition imposed by rotation of 1-D BUCKY solution about the center of the chamber. The wave was propagated for 0.001s, until it reflected from the wall and started converging back towards the center.

15. Error Analysis Two cases considered:non-diffusive flow (m, k=0.0) and diffusive flow (m, k given by Sutherland law). Error analysis was done to determine the influence of the viscous and thermal diffusion on the accuracy of the solution. The errors were estimated by 4 th order Richardson extrapolation.

16. Error Analysis density no diffusion min=3.68e-5 kg/m 3 max=1.19e-3 kg/m 3 density diffusive flow min=3.69e-5 kg/m 3 max=2.09e-3 kg/m 3 error no diffusion avg. = 3% 520x520 grid error diffusive flow avg. = 3.1% 520x520 grid

17. Error Analysis X-momentum no diffusion min= -1.67kg/(m 2 s) max= 1.63kg/(m 2 s) X-momentum diffusive flow min=-1.07kg/(m 2 s) max=0.96kg/(m 2 s) error no diffusion avg. = 3.6% 520x520 grid error diffusive flow avg. = 3.2% 520x520 grid

18. Error Analysis pressure no diffusion min=50.01 Pa max=1.262e3 Pa pressure diffusive flow min=50.42 Pa max=1.24e3 Pa error no diffusion avg. = 1.57% 520x520 grid error diffusive flow avg. = 1.52% 520x520 grid

19. Error Analysis energy no diffusion min=130.59J max=4.492e3J energy diffusive flow min=131.19J max=3.66e3 J error no diffusion avg. = 1.86% 520x520 grid error diffusive flow avg. = 1.7% 520x520 grid

20. Validation Problems cylindrical shock reflection from rectangular geometry

21. 10.111.212.112.9 r[m] initial disturbance Mach reflection

23. Viscous Flow Through the Channel

24. IFE Chamber Dynamics Simulations Objectives Determine the influence of the following factors on the chamber state at 100 ms: -viscosity -blast position in the chamber -heat conduction from gas to the wall. Chamber density, pressure, temperature, and velocity distribution prior to insertion of next target are calculated. Objectives Determine the influence of the following factors on the chamber state at 100 ms: -viscosity -blast position in the chamber -heat conduction from gas to the wall. Chamber density, pressure, temperature, and velocity distribution prior to insertion of next target are calculated.

25. Numerical Simulations IFE Chamber Simulation 2-D cylindrical chamber with a laser beam channel on the side. 160 MJ NRL target Boundary conditions: –Zero particle flux, Reflective velocity –Zero energy flux or determined by heat conduction. Physical time: 500  s (BUCKY initial conditions) to 100 ms. IFE Chamber Simulation 2-D cylindrical chamber with a laser beam channel on the side. 160 MJ NRL target Boundary conditions: –Zero particle flux, Reflective velocity –Zero energy flux or determined by heat conduction. Physical time: 500  s (BUCKY initial conditions) to 100 ms.

26. Numerical Simulations Initial Conditions 1-D BUCKY solution for density, velocity and temperature at 500  s imposed by rotation and interpolation. Target blast has arbitrary location near the center of the chamber. Solution was advanced by SPARTAN code until 100 ms were reached. Initial Conditions 1-D BUCKY solution for density, velocity and temperature at 500  s imposed by rotation and interpolation. Target blast has arbitrary location near the center of the chamber. Solution was advanced by SPARTAN code until 100 ms were reached.

27. Effect of Viscosity on Chamber State at 100 ms inviscid flow at 100 ms pressure, p mean = 569.69 Pa temperature, T mean = 5.08 10 4 K (  C v T) mean = 1.412 10 3 J/m 3 pressure, p mean = 564.87 Pa temperature, T mean = 4.7 10 4 K (  C v T) mean = 1.424 10 3 J/m 3 viscous flow at 100 ms Viscosity makes a difference due to it’s strong dependence on temperature. max min

28. Effect of Blast Position on Chamber State at 100ms pressure, p mean = 564.87 Pa temperature, T mean = 4.7 10 4 K centered blast at 100 ms pressure, p mean = 564.43 Pa temperature, T mean = 4.74 10 4 K eccentric blast at 100 ms Large disturbance due to eccentricity of blast and small numerical disturbances have the same effect after 100 ms. max min

29. Effect of Blast Position on Chamber State at 100 ms pressure at the wall pressure at the mirror Mirror is normal to the beam tube. Pressure is conservative by an order of magnitude. Pressure on the mirror is so small that the mechanical response is negligible. Mirror is normal to the beam tube. Pressure is conservative by an order of magnitude. Pressure on the mirror is so small that the mechanical response is negligible.

30. Effect of Wall Heat Conduction on Chamber State at 100 ms pressure, p mean = 564.431 Pa temperature, t mean = 4.736 10 4 K insulated wall pressure, p mean = 402.073 Pa temperature, t mean = 2.537 10 4 K wall conduction Ionized gas or plasma makes a difference by the means of heat conduction. max min

31. pressure temperature density Chamber Gas Dynamics max min

32. Prediction of chamber condition at long time scale is the goal of chamber simulation research.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program is based on: Staged development of Spartan simulation code. Periodic release of the code and extensive simulations while development of next-stage code is in progress.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program is based on: Staged development of Spartan simulation code. Periodic release of the code and extensive simulations while development of next-stage code is in progress.  Documentation and Release of Spartan (v1.0) Two papers are under preparation  Exercise Spartan (v1.x) Code Use hybrid models for viscosity and thermal conduction. Parametric survey of chamber conditions for different initial conditions (gas constituent, pressure, temperature, etc.)  Need a series of Bucky runs as initial conditions for these cases.  We should run Bucky using Spartan results to model the following shot and see real “equilibrium” condition. Investigate scaling effects to define simulation experiments.  Documentation and Release of Spartan (v1.0) Two papers are under preparation  Exercise Spartan (v1.x) Code Use hybrid models for viscosity and thermal conduction. Parametric survey of chamber conditions for different initial conditions (gas constituent, pressure, temperature, etc.)  Need a series of Bucky runs as initial conditions for these cases.  We should run Bucky using Spartan results to model the following shot and see real “equilibrium” condition. Investigate scaling effects to define simulation experiments.

33. Several upgrades are planned for Spartan (v2.0) Numeric:  Implementation of multi-species capability: Neutral gases, ions, and electrons to account for different thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiative losses. Physics:  Evaluation of long-term transport of various species in the chamber (e.g., material deposition on the wall, beam tubes, mirrors) Atomics and particulate release from the wall; Particulates and aerosol formation and transport in the chamber.  Improved modeling of temperature/pressure evolution in the chamber: Radiation heat transport; Equation of state; Turbulence models. Numeric:  Implementation of multi-species capability: Neutral gases, ions, and electrons to account for different thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiative losses. Physics:  Evaluation of long-term transport of various species in the chamber (e.g., material deposition on the wall, beam tubes, mirrors) Atomics and particulate release from the wall; Particulates and aerosol formation and transport in the chamber.  Improved modeling of temperature/pressure evolution in the chamber: Radiation heat transport; Equation of state; Turbulence models.