Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-1 Human Resource Management 11 th Edition Chapter 13 INTERNAL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-2 HRM in Action: Worker Retention Organizations need to constantly give them reasons to stay Company must have on-going strategy to retain valued employees Virtually every topic in text can be viewed in some manner as being part of a retention strategy Provide means of preventing a person from seeking job with a competitor and remaining with firm
3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-3 Internal Employee Relations Defined Human resource activities associated with movement of employees within firm after they become organizational members
4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-4 Internal Employee Relations Activities Promotion Transfer Demotion Resignation Discharge Layoff Retirement Discipline Disciplinary action
5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-5 Employment at Will Unwritten contract created when employee agrees to work for employer No agreement as to how long parties expect employment to last Approximately 2 of every 3 U.S. workers depend almost entirely on continued goodwill of employer
6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-6 Not Included Individuals with a contract for a specified time period - collective bargaining agreements between labor and management and teachers Whistleblowers
7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-7 Exceptions to Employment-at-Will Doctrine Prohibiting terminations in violation of public policy Permitting employees to bring claims based on representations made in employment handbooks Permitting claims based on common-law doctrine of good faith and fair dealing
8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-8 How Employers Can Protect Themselves No statements suggesting job security or permanent employment Avoiding statements during job interviews, such as “You can expect to hold this job as long as you want” - Could be considered a contractual agreement A person should not be employed without a signed acknowledgment of the at-will disclaimer
9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-9 How Employers Can Protect Themselves (Cont.) Clearly defining worker’s duties Providing good feedback on a regular basis Conducting realistic performance appraisals on a regular basis There is no law involving ethical considerations for employment at will
10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-10 Discipline and Disciplinary Action Discipline - State of employee self-control and orderly conduct Disciplinary action - Invokes penalty against employee who fails to meet established standards
11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-11 Effective Disciplinary Action Addresses employee’s wrongful behavior, not employee as a person Should not be applied haphazardly Not usually management’s initial response to a problem Normally, there are more positive ways of convincing employees to adhere to company policies
12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-12 The Disciplinary Action Process Set Organizational Goals Establish Rules Communicate Rules to Employees Take Appropriate Disciplinary Action Observe Performance Compare Performance with Rules EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-13 Disciplinary Action Word discipline comes from word disciple Translated from Latin, it means to teach Intent of disciplinary action should be to ensure recipient sees disciplinary action as learning process
14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-14 Approaches to Disciplinary Action Hot stove rule Progressive disciplinary action Disciplinary action without punishment
15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-15 Hot Stove Rule Burns immediately Provides warning Gives consistent punishment Burns impersonally Problem - All situations are not the same
16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-16 Progressive Disciplinary Action Ensure minimum penalty appropriate to offense is imposed Model developed in response to National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935 Involves answering series of questions about severity of offense
17
The Progressive Disciplinary Approach Improper Behavior Does this violation warrant disciplinary actions? Does this violation warrant more than an oral warning? Does this violation warrant more than a written warning? Does this violation warrant more than a suspension? Termination Yes No Disciplinary Action Oral Warning Written Warning Suspension No 13-17
18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-18 Suggested Guidelines for Disciplinary Action Offenses Requiring First, an Oral Warning; Second, a Written Warning; and Third, Termination Negligence in the performance of duties Unauthorized absence from job Inefficiency in the performance of job Offenses Requiring a Written Warning; and Then Termination Sleeping on the job Failure to report to work one of two days in a row without notification Negligent use of property Offenses Requiring Immediate Termination Theft Fighting on the job Falsifying time cards Failure to report to work three days in a row without notification
19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-19 Disciplinary Action without Punishment Process of giving worker time off with pay to think about whether he or she wants to follow the rules and continue working for company Employee violates rule, manager issues oral reminder Repetition brings written reminder Third violation: Worker takes 1, 2, or 3 days off (with pay) to think about situation Important all rules explicitly stated in writing
20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-20 Problems in Administration of Disciplinary Action Lack of training Fear The only one Guilt Loss of friendship Time loss Loss of temper Rationalization
21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-21 Disciplinary Action Advice Managers often avoid disciplinary action, even when it is in company’s best interest Some managers believe that even attempting to terminate women and minorities is useless Proper time and place to administer disciplinary action Many supervisors may be too lenient early in disciplinary action process and too strict later
22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-22 Grievance Handling Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Grievance - Employee’s dissatisfaction or feeling of personal injustice relating to employment Grievance procedure - Formal, systematic process that permits employees to express complaints without jeopardizing their jobs
23
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-23 Grievance Procedure Assists management in seeking out underlying causes of and solutions to grievances Virtually all labor agreements include some form of grievance procedure Normally well defined Usually restricted to violations of terms and conditions of agreement
24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-24 General Principles for Effective Grievance Administration Grievances should be adjusted promptly. Procedures and forms used for airing grievances must be easy to utilize and well understood by employees and their supervisors. Direct and timely avenues of appeal from rulings of line supervision must exist.
25
A Multiple-Step Grievance Procedure Arbitrator International Representative, Local President, etc. President, Vice President for Labor Relations, etc. Plant Manager, Personnel Manager, etc. First-Line Supervisor Grievance Committee, Business Agent, etc. Union Steward Aggrieved Employee To Impartial Third Party Grievance in Writing Oral Presentation 13-25
26
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-26 Arbitration Parties submit dispute to impartial third party for binding resolution Final step in most grievance procedures Union and company select arbitrator Courts will generally enforce arbitrator’s decision
27
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-27 Factors Arbitrator May Use to Evaluate Fairness of Management’s Actions Nature of offense Due process and procedural correctness Double jeopardy Past record of grievant Length of service with company Knowledge of rules Warnings Lax enforcement of rules Discriminatory treatment
28
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-28 Formats of Written Warnings Statement of facts concerning offense Identification of rule that was violated Statement of what resulted or could have resulted because of violation Identification of any previous similar violations by same individual Statement of possible future consequences should violation occur again Signature and date
29
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-29 Example of a Written Warning Date: August 1, 2009 To: Judy Bandy From: Wayne Sanders Subject: Written Warning We are quite concerned because today you were thirty minutes late to work and offered no justification for this. According to our records, a similar offense occurred on July 25, 2009. At that time, you were informed that failure to report to work on time is unacceptable. I am, therefore, notifying you in writing that you must report to work on time. Please sign this form to indicate that you have read and understand this warning. Signing is not an indication of agreement. Name Date
30
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-30 Grievance Handling in Union-free Organizations Most large and medium-sized nonunion firms have established formal grievance procedures Means of resolving complaints varies
31
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-31 Ombudspersons Complaint officer with access to top management hears employee complaints, investigates, and recommends appropriate action Impartial, neutral counselors give employees confidential advice about problems ranging from abusive managers to allegations of illegal corporate activity Typically independent of line management and reports near or at top of organization
32
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-32 Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure where employee and company agree problems will be addressed by agreed-upon means ahead of time Arbitration, mediation, mini-trials, and ombudspersons used Uses range from racial, gender, and age discrimination to unfair firings
33
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-33 Alternative Dispute Resolution (Cont.) Presidential EO requires federal agencies to (1) promote greater use of mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation, agency ombudspersons, and other alternative dispute resolution techniques, and (2) promote greater use of negotiated rulemaking Circuit City v Adams – Supreme Court ruling that greatly enhanced employer’s ability to enforce compulsory alternative dispute resolution agreements
34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-34 Termination Most severe penalty; should be most carefully considered Termination of nonmanagerial/nonprofessional employees Termination of executives Termination of middle- and lower-level managers and professionals
35
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-35 Trends & Innovations: Outsourcing Terminations Consultants are now being paid to help fire workers Consultant typically meets with the executive wanting the termination and determines and rehearses what is to be said Consultant is at the firing making sure the manager adheres to the script
36
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-36 Termination of Nonmanagerial/Nonprofessional Employees If firm unionized, termination procedure well defined in labor agreement Non-union workers can generally be terminated more easily
37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-37 Termination of Executives Economic Reorganization/downsize Philosophical differences Decline in productivity No formal appeals procedure
38
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-38 Termination of Middle- and Lower- Level Managers and Professionals In past, most vulnerable and neglected group with regard to termination Not members of union nor protected by labor agreement
39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-39 Termination Software Software available to identify employees who should be terminated during layoff Tell the program how many employees to fire Software sends an e-mail to managers, asking them to rate subordinates on a scale of 1 to 5 Software provides list of people who can be smoothly terminated
40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-40 Demotion as Alternative to Termination Demotions used as alternative to discharge Demotion is process of moving worker to lower level of duties and responsibilities, usually involving reduction in pay
41
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-41 Transfers Lateral movement of worker within organization Should not imply that person is being either promoted or demoted
42
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-42 Transfers Serve Several Purposes Necessary to reorganize Make positions available in primary promotion channels Satisfy employees’ personal desires Deal with personality clashes Becoming necessary to have wide variety of experiences before achieving promotion
43
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-43 Promotion Movement to higher level in company One of the most emotionally charged words in human resource management
44
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-44 Resignation Exit interview Advance notice of resignation
45
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-45 Analyzing Voluntary Resignations Exit interview - Means of revealing real reasons employees leave jobs, which is conducted before employee departs company Postexit questionnaire - Sent to former employees several weeks after leaving organization to determine real reason employee left
46
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-46 Attitude Surveys: Means of Retaining Quality Employees Seek employee input to determine feeling about such topics as: Work environment Opportunities for advancement Firm’s compensation system Their supervisor Training and development opportunities
47
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-47 Advance Notice of Resignation Would like 2 weeks Communicate policy to all employees May pay employee for notice time and ask him/her to leave immediately
48
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-48 Retirement Many long-term employees leave organization through retirement
49
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-49 Phase-in Retirement Working fewer hours as they near 65 More likely to be used among consulting firms, educational institutions, health care, private practice, wholesale/distribution, and other similar organizations Pension Protection Act permits limited phased retirement by allowing in-service pension plan withdrawals to begin at age 62 rather than 65
50
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-50 A Global Perspective: Help for Expats: A Buddy Helps Find the Way Companies are using formal buddy system when sending expatriates on assignments Buddies at Balfour Beatty often inform expatriates of host-office norms and politics, invite them into their homes, introduce them to friends and networks, and help bolster their credibility in the office
51
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.