Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic."— Presentation transcript:

1 09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1" 09:50 Ville Turunen: "Evaluation by IR experiments – Competition 2" 10:10 Delphine Bernhard: "Simple Morpheme Labelling in Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis" 10:30 Break 11:00 Stefan Bordag: "Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Morpheme Segmentation and Analysis" 11:30 Christian Monson: "ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology" 11:50 Paul McNamee: "Applying ngrams and morpheme analysis in IR" 12:10 Michael Tepper: "A Hybrid Approach to the Induction of Underlying Morphology" 12:25 Erwin Chan: "Towards unsupervised induction of morphophonological rules" 13:00 End of workshop

2 Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007 Mikko Kurimo, Mathias Creutz, Matti Varjokallio, Ville Turunen Helsinki University of Technology, Finland

3 Opening Welcome to the Morpho Challenge 2007 workshop: challenge participants workshop speakers other CLEF researchers others interested in the topic

4 Motivation To design statistical machine learning algorithms that discover which morphemes words consist of Follow-up to Morpho Challenge 2005 (segmentation of words into morphs) Morphemes are useful as vocabulary units for statistical language modeling in: Speech recognition, Machine translation, Information retrieval

5 Discussion topics for the end New ways to evaluate morphemes ? New test languages: Hungarian, Estonian, Russian, Arabic, Korean, Japanese, Chinese ? New application evaluations: MT,..? New organizing partners ? Morpho Challenge 3 ? Journal special issue ? 3rd Morpho Challenge workshop ?

6 Thanks Thanks to all who made Morpho Challenge 2007 possible: PASCAL network, CLEF, Leipzig corpora collection Morpho Challenge organizing committee Morpho Challenge participants Morpho Challenge program committee Morpho Challenge evaluation team CLEF 2007 workshop organizers

7 09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1" 09:50 Ville Turunen: "Evaluation by IR experiments – Competition 2" 10:10 Delphine Bernhard: "Simple Morpheme Labelling in Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis" 10:30 Stefan Bordag: "Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Morpheme Segmentation and Analysis" 11:00 Break 11:30 Christian Monson: "ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology" 11:50 Paul McNamee: "Applying ngrams and morpheme analysis in IR" 12:10 Michael Tepper: "A Hybrid Approach to the Induction of Underlying Morphology" 12:25 Erwin Chan: "Towards unsupervised induction of morphophonological rules" 13:00 End of workshop

8 09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1" 09:50 Ville Turunen: "Evaluation by IR experiments – Competition 2" 10:10 Delphine Bernhard: "Simple Morpheme Labelling in Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis" 10:30 Break 11:00 Stefan Bordag: "Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Morpheme Segmentation and Analysis" 11:30 Christian Monson: "ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology" 11:50 Paul McNamee: "Applying ngrams and morpheme analysis in IR" 12:10 Michael Tepper: "A Hybrid Approach to the Induction of Underlying Morphology" 12:25 Erwin Chan: "Towards unsupervised induction of morphophonological rules" 13:00 End of workshop

9 Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1 Mikko Kurimo, Mathias Creutz, Matti Varjokallio

10 Contents Objectives Call for participation, Rules, Datasets Participants Morfessor New evaluation method Results Conclusion

11 Scientific objectives To learn of the phenomena underlying word construction in natural languages To discover approaches suitable for a wide range of languages To advance machine learning methodology

12 Call for participation Part of the EU Network of Excellence PASCAL’s Challenge Program Organized in collaboration with CLEF Participation is open to all and free of charge Word sets are provided for: Finnish, English, German and Turkish Implement an unsupervised algorithm that discovers morpheme analysis of words in each language !

13 Rules Morpheme analysis are submitted to the organizers and two different evaluations are made Competition 1: Comparison to a linguistic morpheme "gold standard“ Competition 2: Information retrieval experiments, where the indexing is based on morphemes instead of entire words.

14 Datasets Word lists downloadable at our home page Each word in the list is preceded by its frequency Finnish: 3M sentences, 2.2M word types Turkish: 1M sentences, 620K word types German: 3M sentences, 1.3M word types English: 3M sentences, 380K word types Small gold standard sample available in each language

15 Examples of gold standard analyses English: baby-sitters baby_N sit_V er_s +PL Finnish: linuxiin linux_N +ILL Turkish: kontrole kontrol +DAT German: zurueckzubehalten zurueck_B zu be halt_V +INF

16 New evaluation method Problem: The unsupervised morphemes may have arbitrary names, not the same as the ”real” linguistic morphemes, nor just subword strings Solution: Compare to the linguistic gold standard analysis by matching the morpheme- sharing word pairs Compute matches from a large random sample of word pairs where both words in the pair have a common morpheme

17 Participants Delphine Bernhard, TIMC-IMAG, F (now moved to Darmstadt Univ. Tech., D) Stefan Bordag, Univ. Leipzig, D Paul McNamee and James Mayfield, JHU, USA Daniel Zeman, Karlova Univ., CZ \\ Christian Monson et al., CMU, USA Emily Pitler and Samarth Keshava, Univ. Yale, USA Morfessor MAP, Helsinki Univ. Tech., FI (Michael Tepper, Univ. Washington, USA)

18 Contents Objectives Call for participation, Rules, Datasets Participants Morfessor New evaluation method Results Conclusion

19 Contents Objectives Call for participation, Rules, Datasets Participants Morfessor New evaluation method Results Conclusion

20 New evaluation method Problem: The unsupervised morphemes may have arbitrary names, not the same as the ”real” linguistic morphemes, nor just subword strings Solution: Compare to the linguistic gold standard analysis by matching the morpheme- sharing word pairs Compute matches from a large random sample of word pairs where both words in the pair have a common morpheme

21 Evaluation measures F-measure = 1/(1/Precision + 1/Recall) Precision is the proportion of suggested word pairs that also have a morpheme in common according to the gold standard Recall is the proportion of word pairs sampled from the gold standard that also have a morpheme in common according to the suggested algorithm

22 Results: Finnish, 2.2M word types

23 Results: Turkish, 620K word types

24 Results: German, 1.3M word types

25 Results: English, 380K word types

26 Conclusion 12 different unsupervised algorithms 6 participating research groups Evaluations for 4 languages Good results in all languages and in IR Full report and papers in the CLEF proceedings Website: http://www.cis.hut.fi/morphochallenge2007/

27 Acknowledgments Data from Leipzig and CLEF Gold standard providers in all languages! Workshop organization by CLEF Funding from PASCAL and Academy of Finland Competition participants!

28 09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1" 09:50 Ville Turunen: "Evaluation by IR experiments – Competition 2" 10:10 Delphine Bernhard: "Simple Morpheme Labelling in Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis" 10:30 Stefan Bordag: "Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Morpheme Segmentation and Analysis" 11:00 Break 11:30 Christian Monson: "ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology" 11:50 Paul McNamee: "Applying ngrams and morpheme analysis in IR" 12:10 Michael Tepper: "A Hybrid Approach to the Induction of Underlying Morphology" 12:25 Erwin Chan: "Towards unsupervised induction of morphophonological rules" 13:00 End of workshop

29 09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic Gold Standard – Competition 1" 09:50 Ville Turunen: "Evaluation by IR experiments – Competition 2" 10:10 Delphine Bernhard: "Simple Morpheme Labelling in Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis" 10:30 Break 11:00 Stefan Bordag: "Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Morpheme Segmentation and Analysis" 11:30 Christian Monson: "ParaMor: Finding Paradigms across Morphology" 11:50 Paul McNamee: "Applying ngrams and morpheme analysis in IR" 12:10 Michael Tepper: "A Hybrid Approach to the Induction of Underlying Morphology" 12:25 Erwin Chan: "Towards unsupervised induction of morphophonological rules" 13:00 End of workshop


Download ppt "09:10 Mikko Kurimo: "Unsupervised Morpheme Analysis -- Morpho Challenge Workshop 2007" 09:30 Mikko Kurimo: "Evaluation by a Comparison to a Linguistic."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google