1. Evaluation of an E-Recruitment Portal Graphs of Responses to “Can’t Rate”, “Ratings”, and “Images”

2. Percentage of Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can NOT Rate UCD On Item: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 *Significant at the.05 level. ** Significant at the.01 level. 12% 53% 36% 34% 5% 38% 19% 46%

3. Percentage of Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can NOT Rate UCD On Item: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 *Significant at the.05 level. 17% 12% 58% 51% 44% 46%

4. Percentage of Fall 2001 Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can NOT Rate UCD: Users vs. Non-Users No differences significant at the.05 level.

5. Percentage of Fall 2001 Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can NOT Rate UCD: Users vs. Non-Users ** Significant at the.01 level. 41% 62%

6. Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Mean Ratings of UC Davis: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 *Significant at the.05 level.

7. Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Mean Ratings of UC Davis: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 No differences significant at the.05 level.

8. Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Mean Ratings of UC Davis Portal Users vs. Non-Users *Significant at the.05 level. ** Significant at the.01 level.

9. Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Mean Ratings of UC Davis: Users vs. Non-Users *Significant at the.05 level. ** Significant at the.01 level.

10. Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Images of UC Davis: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 *Significant at the.05 level.

11. Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Images of UC Davis: Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000 ** Significant at the.01 level.

12. Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Images of UC Davis: Users vs. Non-Users *Significant at the.05 level. ** Significant at the.01 level.

13. Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits’ Images of UC Davis: Users vs. Non-Users *Significant at the.05 level. ** Significant at the.01 level.

14. Logit Regression Results: Odds of Enrolling