Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Attention A classic definition: Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Attention A classic definition: Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Attention A classic definition: Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought. Focalization, concentration of consciousness are of its essence. It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others… William James

3 James’ Attention “Taking possession of the mind…” –Attention has a voluntary aspect “…of one out of what seem several simultaneous possible objects or trains of thought…” –Attentional capacity is limited –Attention involves a process of selection –Attention is not only focusing but also ignoring “…withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others…” –Ignoring is an active process

4 Early Research Demonstrating Limited Capacity E.C. Cherry (1953) Selective auditory attention “Dichotic listening” procedure Subjects given different inputs to each ear Subject asked to report input from one ear first then other ear second Subjects unable to report unattended channel

5 Early Research Demonstrating Selection and Inhibition: The Cocktail Party Effect A relevant conversation can be attended to in spite of a welter of background conversation… But attention can be captured by some meaningful stimulus event occurs in that background

6 What is attention?? Traditional information processing views: Based on limits to simultaneous processing. Mechanisms exist to filter, gate, select or inhibit. Prevailing view for years: Broadbent Bottleneck A basic conversion from massive parallel input to a limited or serial processing mode.

7 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

8 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

9 Broadbent’s Filter Theory of Attention An “early selection” model (1958)

10 The Early Selection Model fell, due to its inability to account for many experimental results. The answer to this: “Late Selection” All stimuli processed to a “semantic” level, then selected on the basis of task relevance

11 Problem with Information Processing View: It doesn’t account for the brain. Sequel to information processing: Hi degree of parallel processing Flexible allocation of resources Attention interacts with motor output.

12 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal (neglect) Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal (neglect, cued orienting, biased competition) Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

22 Early Research in the field of perception had already addressed a more “modern view” Hermann von Helmholtz Electric spark randomly illuminated part of the screen Centrally-fixed gaze Moved attention to a part of the screen Found he could discern letters in the illuminated part if his attention was fixed there PRIOR to the spark Discovered “covert attention”

23 Along came Posner and Boies Attention is not a unitary phenomenon. Alertness or Readiness to take in information (concentration, vigilence) Selective Attention – search a display or an environment for a particular target.

24 Selective Attention Was Divided a Fluid Process With Three Components Engage Disengage Move –A Visuospatial Attention Task Was devised to test this hypothesis and begin to map attention on to “visual” areas of the brain.

25 The Typical Result is: A “benefit” of valid cuing (faster reaction times and more accurate responding) and a “cost” of invalid cuing (slower reaction times and less accurate responding).

26 ENGAGE MOVE DISENGAGE An early mapping of visuospatial attention by Posner

27 Classic Effect of Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Damage on Covert Orienting Task

28 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal Frontal Neurochemistry!! ACh NA DA

29 Basal Forebrain Projections

30

31

32 Voytko

33 Selective lesions of the cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain of rats produces the same increased cost – What does this say for Posner’s Theory???

34

35 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal (neglect, cued orienting, biased competition) Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

36 James’ Attention “Taking possession of the mind…” –Attention has a voluntary aspect “…of one out of what seem several simultaneous possible objects or trains of thought…” –Attentional capacity is limited –Attention involves a process of selection –Attention is not only focusing but also ignoring “…withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others…” –Ignoring is an active process

37

38

39

40 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

41 Classic Task Examining Inhibition of attention: Negative priming (Tipper) task One picture is superimposed upon another. –One is printed in red the other in green ink. –Participants are told to name one (always red ink) and to ignore the other (green ink). –Before each trial a prime is presented briefly. –Naming a red trumpet is affected when the prime is a red kite and a green trumpet (ignored) compared to when the prime is a red kite and a red anchor. –Ignored information must be actively suppressed.

42

43

44

45

46 The Stroop effect in psychology is a demonstration of interference. When color words such as blue, green, red, etc. are printed in various colors and someone is asked to say the color the words are printed in rather than reading the words, it is very difficult to do, at least at first. The effect is named after its discover, John Ridley Stroop, who wrote an article on it in 1935. Stroop effect- another classic Test of Attentional Inhibition OR Impaired Response Inhibition

47 Green Yellow Red Purple Blue Red Black Yellow Orange Blue Purple Red Green Black Blue Yellow Green Red Purple Blue Brown Blue Red Green Yellow Red Yellow Orange

48 Blue Red Green Yellow Black Yellow Orange Red Purple Blue Purple Red Green Black Blue Yellow Green Red Purple Blue Green Yellow Red Yellow Orange Blue Brown Blue Red Green

49 Who has trouble with Negative Priming and Stroop?? Patients with Frontal Lobe Damage Patients with Frontal Dementia Children Chronically Stressed Patients

50 The brain and attention Processing models (stone ages) Biological theories Cortex!! Parietal Frontal Neurochemistry!! Ach NA DA

51 A principled model of attention? “ we have shown that the orientation of attention - specifically, the disengagement or movement of attention- is mediated by acetylcholine” (Phillips et al, 2000)

52

53

54 Expected Reward v = wu v : expected reward w : weight (association) u : stimulus (binary)

55 Rescorla-Wagner Rule Association update rule: w  w + αδu w : weight (association) α : learning rate u : stimulus Prediction error: δ = r - v r : actual reward v : expected reward

56 Uncertainty ( σ i ² ) Kakade, Montague & Dayan, 2001

57 The cholinergic basal forebrain

58 A role of uncertainty in attention?

59 Is this uncertainty mediated by acetylcholine?

60 Kalman weight update rule: w i  w i + α i δ With associability : α i =  i ² u i  j  j ² u j + E

61 w i  w i + α i δ dopamine? acetylcholine? α i =  i ² u i  j  j ² u j + E


Download ppt "Attention A classic definition: Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google