Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Search for LFV decays involving ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University
2
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle2 Motivation In MSSM at large tan may have a large branching ratio by Higgs mediated process. Comparison other mode. M slepton > weak scale, Br( is not large. M. Sher, Phys.Rev.D66 05731(2002) K.S.Babu PRL,89,241802 (2002) A. Dedes, et.al. PLB 549,2442 (2002) is important process!! Br( ) : Br( 3 ) : Br( ) = a. (m s /m ) 2 b. color factor c. phase space
3
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle3 1 10 -7 Status of LFV decay search Belle 3 l CLEO result (PDG2004) Today’s report. 1/ L @ ~ 9% 1/ L @ ~ 3% In MSSM, Br of LFV decay may have O (10 -7 ~10 -9 ). Babar 3 l 1/ L @ ~ 3% Efficiency BG level l 3 l. l
4
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle4 KEKB & Belle detector L peak = 13.9 10 33 /cm 2 /sec Ldt = 287.85 fb -1 Cross section @ s =10.58GeV : 0.9 nb BB : 1.0 nb KEKB is Factory!!!. -ID eff. = 87.5% fake = 1.4 % e-ID eff. = 92.4% fake = 0.25 %
5
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle5 Analysis. Modes – e – e – e ’, ’ ’ Blind analysis Blind region ±10 ±5 ±10 Invariant mass : M = E 2 - p 2 Energy difference : E = E – E beam * Blind region: -0.5< E < 0.5(GeV), -5 < M < 5 Evaluation # of signal event - Low BG level Counting signal candidates using elliptical region
6
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle6 ’ Selection criteria ( l l l ’) Signal event reconstruction signal side ( e ’) + tag side (1 trk + n + missing.) BG suppression For QED BG. –NOT (e) (for 1-1prong) –5 < E CM < 10.GeV For qq and BG – 0 veto for ’s –0.5 < cos < 0.95 –M tag < 1.777 GeV/c 2 –missing momentum towards tag side. –p miss vs. m miss 2 2-D cut. total Br( 1 prong) = 84 % (1prong or 3 prong)
7
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle7 Background suppression (1) Bhabha, , 2photon process Total energy not-(e or in tag side. (Only 1-1 prong modes) Hadronic process (u,d,s,c) generic process Opening angle signal : 5% loss : 80% reject. sig : 2% loss : 67% rej. uds: 65% rej.
8
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle8 Background suppression(2) missing particle : p miss towards detectable regions. signal event : is in only tag side cos thrust-miss < -0.55 BG event : are in both sides Effective missing mass black: signal MC Blue: generic After all kinematical cut applied: (except e/ ID for signal side) eff.( = 3.8 10 -6. eff.(uds) = 3.0 10 -7. eff.( = 3.4 10 -8. eff.(ee) = 3.0 10 -7. signal : 17% loss : 95% reject
9
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle9 Mass distribution ’ mass peak. ( ID; 1.3<M <2.1; with Blind) ~5.2 MeV/c 2 ~ 14 MeV/c 2 m ’ region m – m ~12 MeV/c 2 m – m data:57ev. MC:48.1±4.0 data: 77ev. MC:81.6 ± 8.4 data:109ev. MC:100±5.9 BG: Fake /K (80%) l 0 : true 0 others : mis-combination
10
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle10 E vs M inv. : l 0, l , l ’ BG estimation N exp is calculated from the side band events with assuming a flat distribution. Open blind. N exp =3.1±1.0 N exp =0.15±0.15
11
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle11 E vs M inv. : l 0, l , l ’ BG estimation N exp is calculated from the side band events with assuming a flat distribution. Open blind. N exp =3.1±1.0 N exp =0.15±0.15 Systematic uncertainties - eID:1%, ID: 2%, track: 2%, 0 veto 5.5% Beam BG:2.3% Trigger:1.4% 4.5~8.7% - BG estimation: If N exp <1, assume N exp =0.
12
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle12 Result Br is obtained from Upper limit evaluation (POisson Limit Estimator program) –Feldman-Cousins method s0 2( B X N ) B = s0: signal events : efficiency N : # of pairs B X : B of sub-decay Systematic uncertainty: using the Gaussian error. First search!! J. Conrad et al., PRD 012002 (2003) Preliminary 10-70 times tighter limit from PDG2004 140M
13
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle13 Discussion - - (1) Statistics4.7fb -1 154fb -1 Signal efficiency 7.2% B 8.0% B not use 7.2% B Observed events 0 1 CLEOBelle 33 1.7 Keeping BG level low. Comparison with CLEO result B ( ) < 1.3 10 -7 @ 90% C.L. Upper limit : B ( ) < 9.6 10 -6
14
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle14 Discussion - - (2) Constraint on tan vs m A Preliminary CDF result : measurement (pp A/ bb bbbb) LEP result : LEP Higgs Working Group, PRL 86,4472 (2002) http://lephiggs.web.cern/LEPHIGGS/paper/Note2001-04 B ( ) < 1.3 10 -7 @ 90% C.L.
15
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle15 Search for l l l ’ meson mode using 154fb -1. No indication of signal events. B ( l l l ’) < 1.3 ~ 10 10 –7 @ 90%C.L.. 10-70 times tighter bounds. First searches in e ’, ’. Summary 1/ L @ ~ 9% 1/ L @ ~ 3% l 3 l. l Preliminary
16
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle16 Backup slides
17
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle17 Signal efficiency and BG - muon mode - side band MC : data : b 0 12.5±2.7 13 2.7 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.3 2 0.6 ± 0.4 9.2 ± 2.3 9 3.1 ± 1.0 5.5 ± 1.9 5 1.4 ± 0.6 (153.8, 428, 232, 160 fb -1 )
18
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle18 Signal efficiency and BG - electron modes - side band MC : data : b 0 0.7±0.7 0 0 – 0.0 0.0 ± 0.7 1 0.23 ± 0.23 0.0 ± 0.7 1 0.15 ± 0.15 0.8 ± 0.3 1 0.16 ± 0.16 +0.4
19
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle19 Result: l 0, l , l ’ 5 ev./2.7±0.7 1 ev./0.2±0.2 1 ev./3.1±1.0 0 ev./0.0 +0.4 0 ev./0.2±0.2 0 ev./0.6±0.4 0 ev./1.4±0.6 Preliminary = 4.7% = 6.8% = 5.7% = 8.5% = 6.4% = 7.2% = 8.0% = 8.4% -0.0 N obs /N exp
20
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle20 History of integrated luminosity Continuous injection 2003 Summer: SVD/CDC inner part replacement L dt = 154fb -1 L dt = 288fb -1 L dt = 244fb -1
21
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle21 KEKB HER: 8.0 GeV e – LER: 3.5 GeV e + L peak = 13.9×10 33 /cm 2 /sec Ldt = 287.85 fb -1 Cross section @ s =10.58GeV : 0.9 nb BB : 1.0 nb performance snap shot (2004.3.1) Continuous injection mode LER 1.6A HER 1.1A L ~ 1.1×10 34 /cm 2 /sec KEKB is Factory!!!.
22
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle22 Belle detector / K L detection 14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe C entral D rift C hamber small cell +He/C 2 H 5 CsI(Tl) 16X 0 Aerogel Cherenkov cnt. n=1.015~1.030 Si vtx. det. 3 lyr. DSSD TOF conter Scinti + FM-PMT SC solenoid 1.5T 8 GeV e 3.5 GeV e -ID eff. = 87.5% fake = 1.4 % e-ID eff. = 92.4% fake = 0.25 % proton ID eff. ~ 70 % fake ~ 1 % E resol. E /E = 1.8% @ E=1GeV Trk. resol. pt /p t ~ 0.19p t 0.30/ %
23
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle23 Status of LFV search in Belle New result of this summer. CLEO Babar Belle Published Preliminary
24
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle24 Summary table of LFV search in Belle Preliminary result Published results New result in this summer. First search result. B < O(10 -7 ) are obtained
25
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle25 Systematic uncertainty Related sensitivity Related BG –Using statistical error as systematic error. (30~45%) –If b0 < 1, we set b0=0 in order to obtain conservative limit. In Total : 4.5 ~ 8.7 % POLE program
26
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle26 2.1 Selection criteria ( 1-3 prong + ’) –1-3 prong + n 2 E > 0.1 GeV, barrel and endcap p trk >0.06GeV/c barrel. p trk >0.1GeV/c endcap. net charge=0. dz rms < 1cm, dr rms < 1cm to reject junk track. signal side: e ID > 0.9 + 2trk(+,–). –Missing momentum towards tag side. –p miss vs. m miss 2 2-D cut. –0.5 < cos ’ < 0.92 –-3 < M < 3 using thrust axis, divide 2 hemisphere for tag side, m tag < 1.777 GeV/c 2 ’ e/
27
9/15/2004Search for LFV tau decay involving neutral meson at Belle27 2.2 Selection criteria (1-1 prong + ) –1-1 prong + n 2 signal side: e ID > 0.9 + 2 . P e >0.7GeV/c, E > 0.22GeV – 0 veto for ’s tag side: –NOT (e) –M tag < 1.777 GeV/c 2 Kinematical cut. –Missing momentum towards tag side. –p miss vs. m miss 2 2-D cut. –0.5 < cos ’ < 0.92 –-5 < M < 3 e/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.