Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

User as Citizen 18 October 2006. Midterm  Raw scores are on exams  Midterm counts max of 20% If grades on final are significantly better, I’ll weigh.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "User as Citizen 18 October 2006. Midterm  Raw scores are on exams  Midterm counts max of 20% If grades on final are significantly better, I’ll weigh."— Presentation transcript:

1 User as Citizen 18 October 2006

2 Midterm  Raw scores are on exams  Midterm counts max of 20% If grades on final are significantly better, I’ll weigh it more heavily  Formula to follow  Grade equivalents 70-75A+ 67-69A 65-66A- 61-64B+ 58-60B 55-57B- 52-54C+ 50-51C 43-49C- 40-42D

3 Administrivia  Look for emails and web announcements Grade summary Readings  At end of class today 10 minutes to fill out status report

4 EU Rejects SPAM Trademark Bid "The most evident meaning of the term SPAM for the consumers... will certainly be unsolicited, usually commercial e-mail, rather than a designation for canned spicy ham." -- The European Office of Trade Marks and Designs deals Hormel another blow in a losing battleThe European Office of Trade Marks and Designs (Bonus quote from the company: "Ultimately, we are trying to avoid the day when the consuming public asks, 'Why would Hormel Foods name its product after junk e-mail?' ")

5 What is e-government?  Online access to government services Information Transactions  Opportunity to increase citizen participation  How government works  Question: Does e-government disenfranchise people?

6 Open Government  What does open government mean?  What are sunshine laws?  Why should we care?

7 Freedom of Information Act  The Basics The Basics  Never strongly supported LBJ signing statement  Current state Openthegovernment.org report A propaganda piece

8 Resources  Lots of good site E-Democracy Web tour: Key resources for community participatory decision-making & e- democracy E-Democracy Web tour E-democracy.org: Building online public space …(check the Meetup link) E-democracy.orgMeetup www.factcheck.org: (non partisan, non profit) www.factcheck.org

9 After opening up government, then what?  Transactions  Gathering opinions

10 Information sought  What would you like?  What people get Recreation (50%) Road closings (25%) Health information (25%) Voting records (25%)  Self reported Believable? Could we do better? Why should we care?

11 Information vs. Transactions  Requirements differences Information needs to be correct Processing, not just displaying  Transactions Need to complete processing properly  Exactly once processing Require checking correctness of information entered Require security Require that user provide information  In between: availability of forms

12 Transactions Wanted  Address Change ONCE  Respond to jury summons  Renew driver’s license  Copies of life event certificates (birth, death, marriage, divorce)  Confirm program eligibility and apply Student financial aid, unemployment, Medicare, Medicaid, …  Passport or visa; marriage license  Employment opportunities and application  File taxes  What’s not on this list? VOTING!

13 How To Execute a Transaction  Save the state so you can return to it  Update each part conditionally E.g., debit and credit  If all parts succeed, commit Otherwise roll back

14 ATM Example 1. Verify your account 2. Subtract amount from your account 3. Give you cash 4. Give you receipt  What happens when machine stops and possibly restarts? Analyze each possible case

15 Transaction vs. Printing Forms  Fundamental principle: A system is only as good as its weakest link  Printing forms Posting form Printing form Filling in form Delivering form Entering information Processing information  What is the weakest link?  Examples: electronic transfers

16  Supreme Ct. “Opinion” site (since 2000)Opinion” site  Public comments online: (since Jan ‘03) www.regulations.gov www.regulations.gov  Help America Vote Act of 2002 Help America Vote Act The Federal Government

17  The Thomas ServerThomas Server  First Gov ( U.S. Government official portal) First Gov  Official State of NC Web Portal State of NC Web Portal  County: www.co.orange.nc.uswww.co.orange.nc.us  Chapel Hill Chapel Hill Public documents and searchable databases

18 What is included in e-voting  Range of Systems Optically scanned paper Touch screen systems Internet voting  All Processes (what is the weakest link?) Registration Ballot design Voting Counting of votes Recounts

19 Major concerns raised  Correctness  Certification process  Digital divide  System set up  Auditing (recounts)  Accessibility  Internet vulnerability

20 Correctness  Should code be open source? Belief that more eyes are valuable Easier to hack  Corruption Vulnerability – improved by open source  Checking for errors that hackers can exploit Malicious changes – primarily a concern of which version is running

21 Certification process  More than 40 states require certification  But what does it mean? Need to guarantee certification of last minute fixes or changes – not always possible  Both California and Indiana found themselves using uncertified code

22 Digital Divide  More generally an e-government concern  Intimidation Could become a new literacy test  California recall Less than 1% missed (under voted) for yes/no But nearly 10% under voted in the candidate selection

23 System Set Up  Lack of local technical skills  Large number of local polling stations  Short set up time

24 Auditability vs. Privacy  Storing the full record means that someone could get at the information  Acceptable in England Secret Ballot Act of 1872 Requires that each ballot be tied to the voter Records held as a state secret

25 Auditing (recounts)  Voter Verified Audit Trail Print a copy Voter verifies Puts it into a ballot box  Used for Routine audits (random) Recounts  Problems Cost: Australia opted out Training

26 Why do an audit?  If you can only identify a problem, what is the remedy?  If audit can also produce the corrected results, more valuable

27 Broward County, Florida  special election to fill a state House seat  victor won by only 12 votes  137 of the electronic ballots were blank  Florida law requires a manual recount but no paper ballots recount isn't possible

28 Are there other options?  Code can be verified against manipulating Example: encryption within the system  But, needs to get into the system User interface is the vulnerable spot  Assuming no program errors, can we be sure that people will read a screen version correctly if they made a voting mistake?  Depends … Primarily on the quality of the ballot design

29 Partial Solutions  Turnout: separate track of how many people voted  Number of votes cast should match Need to count abstentions Need to track people who quit in the middle  Does not help to determine if the vote went to the right person

30 Accessibility  Florida ban on plastic templates with holes for use by the visually impaired because NOT CERTIFIED  How do you address this problem without compromising privacy?  How is it done today?  Generally, advocates for the visually impaired prefer electronic voting Techniques to support them, primarily audio  What about the paper audit trail?

31 New Mexico last year  Only two voting machines certified by the federal government for disabled and non- English speaking  Neither measures up to state law that requires voter-verified paper record Upgrade would require $1000/machine

32 What is included in e-voting  Range of Systems Optically scanned paper Touch screen systems Internet voting  All Processes (what is the weakest link?) Registration Ballot design Voting Counting of votes Recounts

33 Major concerns raised  Correctness  Certification process  Digital divide  System set up  Auditing (recounts)  Accessibility  Internet vulnerability

34 Correctness  Should code be open source? Belief that more eyes are valuable Easier to hack  Corruption Vulnerability – improved by open source  Checking for errors that hackers can exploit Malicious changes – primarily a concern of which version is running

35 Certification process  More than 40 states require certification  But what does it mean? Need to guarantee certification of last minute fixes or changes – not always possible  Both California and Indiana found themselves using uncertified code

36 Digital Divide  More generally an e-government concern  Intimidation Could become a new literacy test  California recall Less than 1% missed (under voted) for yes/no But nearly 10% under voted in the candidate selection

37 System Set Up  Lack of local technical skills  Large number of local polling stations  Short set up time

38 Auditability vs. Privacy  Storing the full record means that someone could get at the information  Acceptable in England Secret Ballot Act of 1872 Requires that each ballot be tied to the voter Records held as a state secret

39 Auditing (recounts)  Voter Verified Audit Trail Print a copy Voter verifies Puts it into a ballot box  Used for Routine audits (random) Recounts  Problems Cost: Australia opted out Training

40 Why do an audit?  If you can only identify a problem, what is the remedy?  If audit can also produce the corrected results, more valuable

41 Broward County, Florida  special election to fill a state House seat  victor won by only 12 votes  137 of the electronic ballots were blank  Florida law requires a manual recount but no paper ballots recount isn't possible

42 Are there other options?  Code can be verified against manipulating Example: encryption within the system  But, needs to get into the system User interface is the vulnerable spot  Assuming no program errors, can we be sure that people will read a screen version correctly if they made a voting mistake?  Depends … Primarily on the quality of the ballot design

43 Partial Solutions  Turnout: separate track of how many people voted  Number of votes cast should match Need to count abstentions Need to track people who quit in the middle  Does not help to determine if the vote went to the right person

44 Accessibility  Florida ban on plastic templates with holes for use by the visually impaired because NOT CERTIFIED  How do you address this problem without compromising privacy?  How is it done today?  Generally, advocates for the visually impaired prefer electronic voting Techniques to support them, primarily audio  What about the paper audit trail?

45 New Mexico this past weekend  Only two voting machines certified by the federal government for disabled and non- English speaking  Neither measures up to state law that requires voter-verified paper record Upgrade would require $1000/machine


Download ppt "User as Citizen 18 October 2006. Midterm  Raw scores are on exams  Midterm counts max of 20% If grades on final are significantly better, I’ll weigh."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google