1. Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011

2. Using data for improvement Analyzing the Data Interpreting the Data Planning for Improvement

3. Evidence refers to the numbers, such as “89% of families reported...” The numbers are not debatable Analyzing the data – what is the evidence?

4. How do you interpret the numbers? What can you conclude from the numbers? Does evidence mean good news? Bad news? News we can’t interpret? To reach an inference, sometimes we analyze data in other ways (ask for more evidence). Interpreting the data – what do you mean?

5. Given the inference from the numbers, what should be done? What are recommended actions? What quality practices could help accomplish this outcome? Another role for stakeholders? Planning for improvement- what actions will you take?

6. Looking at Family Survey Data

7. Return rate Representative of population served Ensuring quality of our data

8. What do I do with my family outcomes data? – Looking at outcomes for all families in the program – Looking at outcomes by sub-groups – Looking at outcomes over time Analyzing family outcomes survey data

9. Overall means on indicator(s) Frequency distributions Looking at family outcomes for all families

10. Overall family survey data

12. Palau: Frequency distribution To what extent has your child’s program: helped you know how to help your child learn? encouraged you to be actively involved in your child’s education? included you as a full partner in making decisions about your child’s education? Figure 3: 2009 Preschool Survey Results

13. System Characteristics Service Characteristics Family Characteristics Child Characteristics Looking at family outcomes by subgroups

14. … across the system? Do you have regions/programs that are reasonable subgroups? What about classrooms, teams, providers? Type of program? Are there differences in outcomes…

15. … across service characteristics? Types of service Intensity of services Where services received etc. Are there differences in outcomes…

16. Breakdown for each FSM state

17. Guam Part B

18. What system or service variables make the most sense when analyzing YOUR data? -Region, program, classroom, team, provider, type of program, etc.? -Type of service, intensity of service, where service is received, etc.?

19. … across family characteristics? Race/ethnicity Family income Primary language etc. Are there differences in outcomes…

20. … across child characteristics? Race/ethnicity Family income Primary language etc. Are there differences in outcomes…

21. CNMI-C Table 2. Percent of Families who Report that Early Intervention Services has Helped their Family in Measurement A, B, and C

22. Analysis by child’s disability

23. What family or child characteristics make the most sense when analyzing YOUR data? -Family race/ethnicity, income, language, length of time in service, etc.? -Child race/ethnicity, type of disability, length of time in service, etc.?

24. Do family outcomes change over time?

25. OSEP indicators 4a, 4b, 4c: Statewide results (2006-2008)

26. AS- PART C Q16: Know their rights Indicator 4: Year-to-Year comparisons for question 16

27. Guam Part C- Item comparison over time June 2004 & June 2005 Parent Survey Responses Related to Family Capacity

28. How are families doing on each item?

29. Family survey: Statewide response to questions 1-15

30. If the lowest rated items are: KNOWING YOUR RIGHTS AND ADVOCATING FOR YOUR CHILD 4. How much does your family know about the programs and services that are available? 6. How familiar is your family with your rights? HAVING SUPPORT SYSTEMS 10. How often does your family have someone your family trusts to listen and talk with when they need it? 11. How often does your family have someone you can rely on for help when your family needs it? 12. How often is your family able to do the things your family enjoys? ACCESSING YOUR COMMUNITY 15. How often does your child participate community/social activities right now? Then what kinds of improvements in practices would you want to implement?

31. AS- Part B items (not their chart) Teachers and administration… 1. seek out my input; 2.Show sensitivity to the needs of my child; 3.Encourage me to participate in the decision-making process; 4.Respect my cultural heritage; 5.Help me to understand the Procedural Safeguards [the rules in federal law that protect the rights of parents]; and 6.Show a willingness to learn more about my child’s needs.

32. AS- Part B items (fake data!)

33. More than 90% of the parents surveyed during FFY 2009 monitoring visits also indicated they would be able to: 1. locate policies and procedures related to special education and free appropriate public education; 2.identify RMI’s special education programs and services; 3.exercise rights as parents of a child with disabilities; 4.participate in the education of their children; and 5.assist and support the public education system. MH- Report by items

34. Analyzing the Data Interpreting the Data Planning for Improvement Using data for improvement Then… did your improvement activities make a difference?