Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quintessence – Phenomenology

2 How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?

3 Early dark energy

4 …predicted in models where dark energy is naturally of the same order as matter

5 Time dependence of dark energy cosmological constant : Ω h ~ t² ~ (1+z) -3 M.Doran,…

6 Early dark energy A few percent in the early Universe Not possible for a cosmological constant

7 Structure formation Structures in the Universe grow from tiny Structures in the Universe grow from tiny fluctuations in density distribution fluctuations in density distribution stars, galaxies, clusters stars, galaxies, clusters One primordial fluctuation spectrum describes all correlation functions ! all correlation functions !

8 Early quintessence slows down the growth of structure

9 Growth of density fluctuations Matter dominated universe with constant Ω h : Matter dominated universe with constant Ω h : Dark energy slows down structure formation Dark energy slows down structure formation Ω h < 10% during structure formation Ω h < 10% during structure formation Substantial increase of Ω h (t) since structure has formed! Substantial increase of Ω h (t) since structure has formed! negative w h negative w h Question “why now” is back ( in mild form ) Question “why now” is back ( in mild form ) P.Ferreira,M.Joyce

10 Fluctuation spectrum Caldwell,Doran,Müller,Schäfer,…

11

12 normalization of matter fluctuations rms density fluctuation averaged over 8h -1 Mpc spheres compare quintessence with cosmological constant Doran, Schwindt,…

13 Early quintessence and growth of matter fluctuations early quintessence for small Ω h : ε/2 = 3/5

14 for varying early dark energy : weighted average of Ω influence of late evolution of quintessence through conformal time τ 0 and averaged equation of state a tr : transition from slow early evolution of Ω h to more rapid late evolution

15 at most a few percent dark energy in the early universe !

16

17

18

19

20 effect of early quintessence presence of early dark energy decreases ρ for given t slower growth of perturbation

21

22

23

24

25

26 Equation of state p=T-V pressure kinetic energy p=T-V pressure kinetic energy ρ=T+V energy density ρ=T+V energy density Equation of state Equation of state Depends on specific evolution of the scalar field

27 Negative pressure w < 0 Ω h increases (with decreasing z ) w < 0 Ω h increases (with decreasing z ) w < -1/3 expansion of the Universe is w < -1/3 expansion of the Universe is accelerating accelerating w = -1 cosmological constant w = -1 cosmological constant late universe with small radiation component :

28 small early and large present dark energy fraction in dark energy has substantially increased since end of structure formation fraction in dark energy has substantially increased since end of structure formation expansion of universe accelerates in present epoch expansion of universe accelerates in present epoch

29 exact relation between w h and change in Ω h eq

30

31 + (

32

33 Time dependence of dark energy cosmological constant : Ω h ~ t² ~ (1+z) -3 M.Doran,…

34 Quintessence becomes important “today”

35 w h close to -1 inferred from supernovae and WMAP

36 Supernova cosmology Riess et al. 2004

37 Dark energy and SN Ω M = 0.29 Ω M = 0.29 +0.05-0.03 +0.05-0.03 (SN alone, for Ω tot =1) (SN alone, for Ω tot =1)

38 SN and equation of state Riess et al. 2004

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47 Supernova cosmology Riess et al. 2004

48 supernovae : negative equation of state and recent increase in fraction of dark energy are consistent !

49 quintessence and CMB anisotropies influence by influence by early dark energy early dark energy present equation of state present equation of state

50 Anisotropy of cosmic background radiation Caldwell,Doran,Müller,Schäfer,…

51 separation of peaks depends on dark energy at last scattering and on conformal time involves the integral ( with weighted w )

52 Peak location in quintessence models for fixed cosmological parameters

53 phenomenological parameterization of quintessence

54 …based on parameterization of Ω natural “time” variable use relation ( matter domination ) define

55 three parameter family of models fraction in matter Ω M present equation of state w 0 bending parameter b

56 relation of b to early dark energy Taylor expansion does nor make much sense for large z

57 average equation of state yields simple formula for H simple relation with b

58 equation of state changes between w 0 and 0

59 reconstruction of cosmon potential or kinetial

60 Dynamics of quintessence Cosmon  : scalar singlet field Cosmon  : scalar singlet field Lagrange density L = V + ½ k(φ)  Lagrange density L = V + ½ k(φ)  (units: reduced Planck mass M=1) (units: reduced Planck mass M=1) Potential : V=exp[-  Potential : V=exp[-  “Natural initial value” in Planck era  “Natural initial value” in Planck era  today:  =276 today:  =276

61 for “ standard “ exponential potential : construction of kinetial from equation of state

62 How to distinguish Q from Λ ? A) Measurement Ω h (z) H(z) i) Ω h (z) at the time of i) Ω h (z) at the time of structure formation, CMB - emission structure formation, CMB - emission or nucleosynthesis or nucleosynthesis ii) equation of state w h ( today ) > -1 ii) equation of state w h ( today ) > -1 B) Time variation of fundamental “constants”

63 end

64 cosmological equations


Download ppt "Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google