1. Spanish Politics and Society The Institutions of Spanish Democracy: Legislatives in Spanish Politics. Anthony Gilliland Office 20.123 anthony.gilliland@upf.edu

2. Introduction The Spanish institutional system: the Cortes Generales (Parliament) How strong is the Parliament in Spain? What is meant by strength? The theory on how to measure it. The case of Spain

3. The institutional system  Bicameral parliamentary system. Congress Senate  Congress is more powerful It has a say in the formation of the government Can remove a government Confirms or rejects all amendments or veto from the Senate to any of its bills  The constitution sets out the functions of each chamber.

4. The Cortes (i): Congreso  Size: between 300 and 400 deputies set by constitution, electoral law establishes at 350.  Election of members: All deputies are elected by universal, equal, free, direct and secret suffrage Electoral districts are the provinces. Electoral law sets 2 seats per district then shares the reminder according to respective population. (Ceuta and Melilla get one seat each). Within each district a PR formula is used so that the number of seats going to any party list is proportional to the share of the vote.  Duration: elected every 4 years  Members Mandate: they represent the district as well as the whole of Spain.

5. Congress...  Functions: Legislative and Control Legislative  Legislative initiative  Accepting proposed legislation  Introduction of amendments  Bill debate and Commission deliberation  Debate and vote in chamber  Debate and vote on Senate amendments and vote  Bill approval and publication  SPECIAL CASES: Organic laws Budget Autonomy statutes Constitutional reform  Authorisation from Congress

6. Congress... Control or check function  Approval of President of the Government (Investidura)  Censure motions and confidence vote  Questions and “comparecencias”  No legislative motions and resolutions  Nominations and appointment to posts in some State organisations.

7. The Cortes (ii): the Senate  Set by the constitution as a territorial representation chamber. It is weaker than Congress but most important legislation requires its consent.  Functions: territorial integration, it deals mainly with regional and local matters. as legislator, it acts as another legislative chamber but bills initiate process in Congress (except on projects of the Interterritorial Compensation Funds). It can amend or veto bills but can be overturned by Congress. As a check and to provide political impulse Check on foreign policy  Authorise ratification of international treaties (in this it has equal powers with Congress).

8. Parliamentary strength  Public policy-making influence Where influence is the ability to affect public policy substantially.  According to theory ability to affect public policy is zero-sum with executive and is generally based on the ability of parliament to change or preclude executive bills.

9. The Standard classifications of legislative influence on policy

10. How to measure parliaments influence  Ability to reject executive bills and substitute parliamentary legislation. as percentage of bills coming from executive. as comparison of percentage of bills introduced by exec that become law and percentage of private bills that become law. or by looking at key bills such as the Budget in Spain.  Ability to influence legislative agenda (formal and informal) by influencing executive agenda by modification to bills  Ability to modify executive legislation Percentages of amendments accepted or qualitative interviews to find out substance.

11. Electoral results 1977 to 1996

12. SPAIN (i): Ability to reject executive bills and substitute parliamentary legislation (i)

13. SPAIN (i): Ability to reject executive bills and substitute parliamentary legislation (ii)

14. SPAIN (ii): Ability to influence legislative agenda  It occurs more often than rejection  It is very difficult to measure  Congress can affect legislation through agenda setting Formally, through non legislative motions Informally, through informal negotiations  Through in depth interviews, concludes: 1979-82 opposition regularly influenced agenda 1993-96 executive priorities were shaped by pact with CiU

15. SPAIN (iii): Ability to modify executive legislation  All parliamentary groups report greater ability to modify executive legislation in 1979-82  High ability to modify also in 1993-96 (specially regionalist parties)  But note: 1995 saw important organic law reforms (where consensus is sought) 1993-96 PSOE minority government with CiU unwritten support.

16. The influence of Congress  In these three quantitative and qualitative measurements based on standard comparative theory, legislative influence is seen in a zero-sum trade-off with the executive. Applied to the case of the Spanish Congress, they indicate that parliament exercised its greatest ability to influence policy in 1979-82 and 1993-96 and the least ability in 1982-86.  Congress has during certain sessions asserted independence vis a vis the executive as a transformative policy making body, while at other time it has operated as more of a rubber stamp chamber approving executive initiative. How con this be explained?

17. How to explain influence  Studies to explain influence have focused on three main aspects: (1) the size of or absence of majority representation of the government party in the legislative body; (2) the degree of party unity and party discipline; and (3) the existence of a specialised committee system.  In Spain (as a new democracy) we need to consider also: (1) the special requirements of the process of democratic consolidation; (2) the nature of legislation; (3) the formal rules affecting parliament; (4) the impact of membership in the European Union; and (5) Spain's asymmetric federal structure.

18. The nature of the transition to democracy and nature of legislation  Transition as consensus between united elites assembled in congress. Consensus continued in 1979-82 when parliamentary influence was high PSOE wins bring change from consensus to majoritarian decision-making. 1993-96 minority government sees a rise in negotiations.  Nature of legislation First legislative session set the cornerstones of the regime, hence consensus sought for continuity. 1995 also saw important legislation

19. Formal rules affecting the parliament  Electoral law  The constitution and standing orders of the parliament  Membership in international organisations  Structure of state: federal vs unitary

20. Conclusions