1. Concept Design Review Micro Air Vehicle Project: P07121 02.09.07 Sponsored by Impact Technologies The Boeing Company Mark Baybutt Electrical Engineering David Blonski Industrial Engineering Team Leader Andrea Wyant Electrical Engineering Geoff Amey Computer Engineering Perry Young Mechanical Engineering Daniel Segar Mechanical Engineering Patrick O’Neil Mechanical Engineering Timothy Nowicki Mechanical Engineering Benjamin Metz Mechanical Engineering Jeffrey Kozak Customer / Guide Mechanical Engineering

2. Team Breakdown

3. Customer Requirements Able to fly 1200m (linearly) Able to take two “legible” pictures Wireless remote control Stay within budget Ability to launch Able to be flown accurately Must be durable Must provide hard copy of photos Onboard power supply

4. Customer Needs

5. Engineering Specifications

6. QFD Analysis Part 1

7. QFD Analysis Part 2

8. Morphological Analysis Stronger Antennae New Controller New Servos Decrease # of Servos New Receivers Angle of Attack Increase Motor RPM Decrease Propeller Size Fewer Batteries Standard Body Timing System Smaller Morphable Wing PodSmaller Scalability Winglets Smaller Tail Thermoset

9. Pugh Analysis Part 1

10. Pugh Analysis Part 2

11. Ranking

12. Old MAV

13. New MAV Feigao Motor 3”x2” Prop Smaller Tail Tear-drop Pod 10 o Angle of Attack Berg 4L Receiver 2S 730mAh Battery Reoptimized Airfoil Twill-Weave Carbon Composites

14. Theoretical Motor Analysis

15. Empirical Motor Analysis BatteryPropeller DimensionsThrust/G @ 1A (g)Thrust/G @ 2 A (g)Thrust/G @ 3A (g)Thrust/G @ 4A (g)Thrust/G @ 5A (g) 11.5 V 480 mAh 2.5" x 1"4575100auto off 3" x 2"4070100110auto off 3" x 3"254560auto off 7.4 V 730 mAh 2.5" x 1"3060auto off 3" x 2"306080100115 3" x 3"2040506580 7.4 V 480 mAh 2.5" x 1"3060auto off 3" x 2"306080auto off 3" x 3"25456070auto off

16. Weight Breakdown (Last Year)

17. Weight Breakdown (Current Team)

18. Power Consumption 05-06 06-07

19. Budget

20. SDII Schedule