Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
2
COLOR VISION After Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
3
COLOR VISION “The Color Story” is a prototype for Cognitive Science Contributions from: Physics (Newton) Philosophy (Locke) Art (Munsell) Psychophysics (Maxwell) Physiology (De Valois) Cognitive Psychology (Rosch) Neurology (Zeki) Linguistics (Lakoff) Cognitive Anthropology (Berlin & Kay) Computer Science (Zadeh) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
4
COLOR VISION “The Color Story” is a prototype for Cognitive Science Contributions from: * Berkeley faculty Physics (Newton) Philosophy (Locke) Art (Munsell) Psychophysics (Maxwell) Physiology (De Valois) Cognitive Psychology (Rosch) Neurology (Zeki) Linguistics (Lakoff) Cognitive Anthropology (Berlin & Kay) Computer Science (Zadeh) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
5
The Physics of Light Light: Electromagnetic energy whose wavelength is between 400 nm and 700 nm. (1 nm = 10 meter) -6 © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
6
The Physics of Light Some examples of the spectra of light sources © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
7
The Physics of Light Some examples of the reflectance spectra of surfaces Wavelength (nm) % Photons Reflected Red 400 700 Yellow 400 700 Blue 400 700 Purple 400 700 © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
8
The Psychophysical Correspondence There is no simple functional description for the perceived color of all lights under all viewing conditions, but …... A helpful constraint: Consider only physical spectra with normal distributions area mean variance © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
9
The Psychophysical Correspondence MeanHue # Photons Wavelength © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
10
The Psychophysical Correspondence VarianceSaturation Wavelength # Photons © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
11
The Psychophysical Correspondence AreaBrightness # Photons Wavelength © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
12
Overview of the Visual System
13
Physiology of Color Vision © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Cones cone-shaped less sensitive operate in high light color vision Rods rod-shaped highly sensitive operate at night gray-scale vision Two types of light-sensitive receptors
14
The Microscopic View
15
http://www.iit.edu/~npr/DrJennifer/visual/retina.html Rods and Cones in the Retina
16
What Rods and Cones Detect Notice how they aren’t distributed evenly, and the rod is more sensitive to shorter wavelengths
17
How They Fire No stimuli: –both fire at base rate Stimuli in center: –ON-center-OFF-surround fires rapidly –OFF-center-ON-surround doesn’t fire Stimuli in surround: –OFF-center-ON-surround fires rapidly –ON-center-OFF-surround doesn’t fire Stimuli in both regions: –both fire slowly
18
Center / Surround Strong activation in center, inhibition on surround The effect you get using these center / surround cells is enhanced edges top: the stimuli itself middle: brightness of the stimuli bottom: response of the retina You’ll see this idea get used in Regier’s model http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~lera/psych115s/notes/lecture3/figures1.html
19
Theories of Color Vision Two main algorithmic theories of color vision: © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Trichromatic Theory (Palmer/Young/Helmholtz) Hermann von Helmholtz Opponent Process Theory (Hering) Ewald Hering
20
© Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Three kinds of cones: Absorption spectra Implementation of Trichromatic theory Physiology of Color Vision Opponent Processes: R/G = L-M G/R = M-L B/Y = S-(M+L) Y/B = (M+L)-S
21
© Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Opponent-Process Cells in LGN (De Valois) Physiology of Color Vision Implementation of opponent process theory (Similar color behavior in retinal ganglion cells)
22
© Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Double Opponent Cells in V1 Physiology of Color Vision G+R-G+R- G+R-G+R- R+G-R+G- R+G-R+G- Red/Green Y+B-Y+B- Y+B-Y+B- B+Y-B+Y- B+Y-B+Y- Blue/Yellow
23
Color Blindness Not everybody perceives colors in the same way! What numbers do you see in these displays? © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
24
Color Blindness There are several forms of inherited variations of color vision. Trichromatic (“normal”) color vision Dichromatic color vision 2 forms of red-green color blindness 1 form of yellow-blue color blindness Monochromatic color vision 4 forms Various forms of “color weakness” © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
25
Color Blindness What does the world look like to a color blind person? Normal Trichromat ProtanopeDeuteranopeTritanope © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
26
Theories of Color Vision Opponent Process theory (Hering): All colors are combinations of responses in three underlying bipolar systems (Red/Green, Blue/Yellow, Black/White). © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
27
Theories of Color Vision Dual Process Theory (Hurvich & Jameson): The color vision system contains two stages: an initial trichromatic stage and a later opponent-process stage. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Trichromatic stage Opponent- Process stage Dual Process Theory
28
Theories of Color Vision A Dual Process Wiring Diagram © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Trichromatic Stage Opponent Process Stage
29
COLOR VISION: Part 4 © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 1. Color Constancy: Surface-based processing 2. Color Naming: Category-based processing
30
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Color Constancy: the ability to perceive the invariant color of a surface despite ecological Variations in the conditions of observation. Another inverse problem: Physics of light emission and surface reflection underdetermine perception of surface color
31
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 RwRw IwIw LwLw
32
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
33
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Two approaches to lightness constancy Unconscious Inference (Helmholtz) Luminance = Intensity * Reflectance If you know L and I, you can solve for R! Invariant Relations (Hering) Luminance ratios are invariant with illumination
34
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Luminance ratio is invariant over illumination: Luminance Ratio = 9:1
35
Color Constancy © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 What about absolute lightness? How do we know what is white? (How big is the anchor???) The anchoring problem:
36
Anchoring heuristic: The lightest region is taken as white
37
COLOR VISION: © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Color Naming: Category-based processing Big Questions for Cognitive Science 1)Are Words Arbitrary? 2)Does Language Influence Thought? (Whorf Hypothesis)
38
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Basic Color Terms (Berlin & Kay) Criteria: 1. Single words -- not “light-blue” or “blue-green” 2. Frequently used -- not “mauve” or “cyan” 3. Refer primarily to colors -- not “lime” or “gold” 4. Apply to any object -- not “roan” or “blond”
39
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 BCTs in English Red Green Blue Yellow Black White Gray Brown Purple Orange* Pink
40
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Five more BCTs in a study of 98 languages Light-Blue Warm Cool Light-Warm Dark-Cool
41
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Studied color categories in two ways Boundaries Best examples (Berlin & Kay)
42
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 MEMORY : Focal colors are remembered better than nonfocal colors. LEARNING: New color categories centered on focal colors are learned faster. Categorization: Focal colors are categorized more quickly than nonfocal colors. (Rosch)
43
Color Naming Degree of Membership Fuzzy set theory (Zadeh) A fuzzy logical model of color naming (Kay & Mc Daniel) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
44
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 “Primary” color categories
45
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 “Primary” color categories Red Green Blue Yellow Black White
46
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 “Derived” color categories Fuzzy logical “AND f ”
47
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 “Derived” color categories Orange = Red AND f Yellow Purple = Red AND f Blue Gray = Black AND f White Pink = Red AND f White Brown = Yellow AND f Black (Goluboi = Blue AND f White)
48
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 “Composite” color categories Fuzzy logical “OR f ” Warm = Red Or f Yellow Cool = Blue Or f Green Light-warm = White Or f Warm Dark-cool = Black Or f Cool
49
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002
50
The WCS Color Chips Basic color terms: –Single word (not blue-green) –Frequently used (not mauve) –Refers primarily to colors (not lime) –Applies to any object (not blonde) FYI: English has 11 basic color terms
51
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Five more BCTs in a study of 98 languages Light-Blue Warm Cool Light-Warm Dark-Cool
52
Results of Kay’s Color Study If you group languages into the number of basic color terms they have, as the number of color terms increases, additional terms specify focal colors Stage IIIIIIa / IIIbIVVVIVII W or R or YWWWWWW Bk or G or BuR or Y RRRR Bk or G or BuG or BuYYYY BkG or BuGGG BkBu WBk RY+Bk (Brown) YR+W (Pink) Bk or G or BuR + Bu (Purple) R+Y (Orange) B+W (Grey)
53
Color Naming © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Typical “developmental” sequence of BCTs
54
COLOR VISION: © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002 Color Naming: Category-based processing Big Questions for Cognitive Science 1)Are Words Arbitrary? 2)Does Language Influence Thought? (Whorf Hypothesis)
55
Overview of the Visual System
58
Same paradigm with dogs vs. cats
60
Verbal interference caused RVF reversal as with color Animal mismatch task, with verbal and non verbal masks.
61
Aphasic patients on visual search task w/o interference
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.