Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Speech Recognition in Noise
Esfandiar Zavarehei Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering Brunel University 25 May, 2004
2
Contents The use of formant features in speech recognition
- Variable-Order LP Formant Tracker with Kalman Filtering - Results Kalman De-noising - Tracking and Filtering the Frequency Trajectories (RASTA) - How Kalman Filter is applied to de-noising problem - Advantages of Kalman
3
Variable-Order LP Formant tracker
Higher order of LP modelling for higher resolution Continuity criteria for better classification Kalman Filtering for smoother Tracks
4
Formant Feature (FF) Vectors
In addition to the Frequency of poles their Band Widths and Magnitudes are used as well The HMM models are trained on mono-phones.
5
FF vs. MFCC with and without energy component
Mono-phone recognition in Train noise Better performance of FF in severe noisy conditions
6
Robustness of dynamic FF to noise
Mono-phone recognition in Train noise Dynamic Features are much more robust to noise
7
The use of the Formants for consonant recognition
Mono-phone recognition in Train noise Higher Recognition rates than vowels in higher SNR More sensitive to noise because of the lower energy level
8
De-noising the speech by filtering frequency trajectories
9
RelAtive SpecTrA (RASTA) Processing
Filtering the frequency trajectories of the cubic root of power spectrum using a fixed IIR filter
10
The use of FIR filters in RASTA
Filtering the frequency trajectories of the power spectrum using a bank of non-casual FIR filters not adaptive experimentally derived Filters’ Impulse Response
11
Kalman Filter adaptively updates itself with noise covariance
Kalman Filtering Kalman Filter adaptively updates itself with noise covariance
12
How Kalman Filter is applied to de-noising problem
Noise Modelling and updating Neighbour Trajectory Segment Frequency Bin Trajectory VAD Noise Modelling Prior Noise Model and Trajectory Statistics Spectral Subtraction Observation Predictor Predicted Error covariance Noise Covariance Mean Kalman Gain Estimator Output Kalman Filtering
13
A more informed noise reduction
Advantages of Kalman A more informed noise reduction Combining the prediction and the observation of the frequency trajectory Adaptively updating the noise model while filtering the trajectory (in comparison with RASTA) Could (and probably should) be combined with spectral subtraction for improved performance
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.