1. “Affordability Amendment” – edited for class discussion [Basic premise or goal] The ability to live in a well-designed walkable neighborhood should be within reach of all people, regardless of social or economic status. [Basic premise or goal] The ability to live in a well-designed walkable neighborhood should be within reach of all people, regardless of social or economic status.

2. Underlying Values – From CNU EQUITY EQUITY –“liberal’ sense of greater equality of circumstance, assumption that this is necessary for greater equality of opportunity –“conservative” emphasis on self-reliance SUSTAINABILITY SUSTAINABILITY DIVERSITY DIVERSITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY

3. Toward a New City of Justice and Peace / Bishop Anthony Pilla “Church in the City” 1991 “Church in the City” 1991 The problem – pages 4, 6 The problem – pages 4, 6 Values and goals – page 5 Values and goals – page 5 Action – pages 7 - 10 Action – pages 7 - 10

4. For discussion To what extent do you agree or disagree with this goal? To what extent do you agree or disagree with this goal? Why? Why? To help sort this out, consider: To help sort this out, consider: –what values, visions, and practical considerations underlie this goal? –what are the main competing values, visions, and practical arguments? –How do these relate to larger political ideologies – conservative, liberal, radical?

5. Affordability is dependent on many factors, including –location within a region –neighborhood structure –access to jobs and services –and housing mix and tenure.

6. [Sub-goals] substantially increase the supply, diversity, and quality of housing substantially increase the supply, diversity, and quality of housing enable new development that welcomes a diverse mix of people. enable new development that welcomes a diverse mix of people.

7. [Means] Policy intervention from the public sector Policy intervention from the public sector Incentives for the private sector Incentives for the private sector The elimination of exclusionary regulatory barriers The elimination of exclusionary regulatory barriers Participatory planning and design Participatory planning and design

8. RESEARCH ON INCLUSIONARY ZONING Rusk, Inside Game / Outside Game p. 191- Rusk, Inside Game / Outside Game p. 191-

9. DISCUSSION / DEBATE Do you favor? Do you favor? –Elimination of “exclusionary zoning” –“Inclusionary zoning” such as Montgomery County’s MPDU policy? What concerns do you have about the implications of your preference? What concerns do you have about the implications of your preference? What information would you need to make a more certain decision? What information would you need to make a more certain decision?