Sources of Comparative Advantage

Sources of Comparative Advantage
PowerPoint slides prepared by: Andreea Chiritescu Eastern Illinois University © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-endowment theory Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Immediate basis for trade: difference between pre-trade relative product prices of trading nations Prices depend on the production possibilities curves and tastes and preferences (demand conditions) in the trading countries Production possibilities curves depend on technology and resource endowments © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-endowment theory
Ultimate determinants of comparative advantage Technology Resource endowments Demand Assumption: technology and demand are approximately the same between countries © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-endowment theory Resource-endowment ratio
Determines comparative advantage Export the product that uses a large amount of its relatively abundant resource Import the product which in production uses the relatively scarce resource © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

TABLE 3.1 Producing aircraft and textiles: factor endowments in the United States and China © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Effect of resource endowments on comparative advantage © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Capital stock per worker of selected countries, 1997*
TABLE 3.2 Capital stock per worker of selected countries, 1997* © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

The factor-endowment theory
FIGURE 3.1 The factor-endowment theory A country exports the good whose production is intensive in its relatively abundant factor. It imports the good whose production is intensive in its relatively scarce factor. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-endowment theory, U.S.-China trade
United States Relatively abundant: human capital (skills), scientific talent, and engineering talent are relatively abundant Relatively scarce: unskilled labor is relatively scarce China Relatively rich: unskilled labor Relatively scarce: scientific and engineering talent © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-endowment theory, U.S.-China trade
United States exports to China Goods embodying relatively large amounts of skilled labor and technology Aircraft, software, pharmaceuticals, and high-tech components of electrical machinery and equipment China exports to the United States Goods for which a relatively large amount of unskilled labor is used Apparel, footwear, toys, and the final assembly of electronic machinery and equipment © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

U.S.-China trade: top ten products, 2007 (thousands of dollars)
TABLE 3.3 U.S.-China trade: top ten products, 2007 (thousands of dollars) © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-Price Equalization
Redirect demand away from the scarce resource Toward the abundant resource in each nation Trade leads to factor-price equalization The cheap resource becomes relatively more expensive The expensive resource becomes relatively less expensive Until price equalization occurs © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

The factor-price equalization theory (a)
FIGURE 3.2 The factor-price equalization theory (a) By forcing product prices into equality, international trade also tends to force factor prices into equality across countries. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

The factor-price equalization theory (b)
FIGURE 3.2 The factor-price equalization theory (b) By forcing product prices into equality, international trade also tends to force factor prices into equality across countries. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Factor-Price Equalization
Real world – no full factor-price equalization Uneven ownership of human capital Education, training, skill, and the like Not all countries use the same technology New and better technology replaces older technologies – faster in developed countries Transportation costs and trade barriers Reduce the volume of trade © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Indexes of hourly compensation, manufacturing workers, 2006 (U.S.=100)
TABLE 3.4 Indexes of hourly compensation, manufacturing workers, 2006 (U.S.=100) © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Stolper-Samuelson Theorem
Extension of the theory of factor-price equalization An increase in the price of a product Increases the income earned by resources that are used intensively in its production A decrease in the price of a product Reduces the income of the resources that it uses intensively Some people will suffer losses from free trade © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Magnification effect of Stolper-Samuelson theorem
The change in the price of a resource Is greater than the change in the price of the good That uses the resource relatively intensively in its production process © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Policy implications of Stolper-Samuelson theorem
Even though free trade may provide overall gains for a country There are winners and losers Owners of relatively abundant resources Favor free trade Owners of relatively scarce factors Favor trade restrictions © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Globalization drives changes for U.S. Automakers
Big Three (GM, Ford, and Chrysler) Higher production costs Large pension obligations and health care costs Hundreds of thousands of retirees 2008, GM spent $4.8 billion on health care $1,500 higher cost per vehicle Higher hourly wages: $30 (and $30 in benefits) Toyota, Honda Health care costs - $200 per vehicle Hourly wages: $24 (and $24 in benefits) © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

TABLE 3.5 Labor-cost gap per vehicle hurts competitiveness of big three automakers © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments International trade - substitute for migration?
Immigrants Help the economy grow Increasing the size of the labor force Take low skilled jobs few native-born Americans are available to work Take jobs that contribute to the United States being a leader in technological innovation © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments International trade
Substitute for the movement of resources from one country to another International movements in resources are not essential International trade in products can achieve the same result Complement labor migration, short and near-long terms Expanding trade – some unemployed workers Forced to seek employment abroad © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Factor Endowments Specific-factors theory
Income distribution effects of trade In the short term When resources are immobile among industries Resources specific to import-competing industries Lose as a result of trade Resources specific to export industries Gain as a result of trade © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Does Trade Make the Poor Even Poorer?
Wage gap: skilled and unskilled workers Some combination of trade, technology, education, immigration, and union weakness Income inequality - pervasive Wages of skilled workers “relative” to those of unskilled workers Outcome of the interaction between supply and demand in the labor market © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Wage ratio Wage of skilled workers divided by the wage of unskilled workers Labor ratio Quantity of skilled workers available divided by the quantity of unskilled workers © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Inequality of wages between skilled and unskilled workers
FIGURE 3.3 Inequality of wages between skilled and unskilled workers By increasing the demand for skilled relative to unskilled workers, expanding trade or technological improvements result in greater inequality of wages between skilled and unskilled workers. Also, immigration of unskilled workers intensifies wage inequality by decreasing the supply of skilled workers relative to unskilled workers. However, expanding opportunities for college education results in an increase in the supply of skilled relative to unskilled workers, thus reducing wage inequality. In the figure, the wage ratio equals wage of skilled workers/wage of unskilled workers. The labor ratio equals the quantity of skilled workers/quantity of unskilled workers. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

International trade and technological change Increase in the demand curve of skilled workers relative to unskilled workers Higher degrees of wage inequality Immigration Decrease in the supply of skilled workers relative to unskilled workers Higher wage inequality © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Education and training Increase in the supply curve of skilled workers relative to unskilled workers Reduce the wage inequality Sources of wage inequality Trade and immigration Small effects Domestic sources, especially technology © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Does a “flat world” make Ricardo wrong?
Critiques of globalization The world has become “flat” Comparative advantages dwindled / or dried up China and India – economic development; more similar to U.S. A level playing field Internet, wireless technology, search engines, other innovations. United States could become worse off with trade © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Does a “flat world” make Ricardo wrong?
Problems with this critique Globalization - increased international economic interdependence Ignores the ways in which modern trade differs from Ricardo’s simple model The world is not flat at all © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Skill as Source of Comparative Advantage
U.S. Relatively capital abundant Relatively labor scarce Factor-endowment theory Export capital-intensive goods Import-competing goods will be labor intensive © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Leontief paradox Capital/labor ratios, 200 export industries and import-competing industries, 1947 Capital/labor ratio for U.S. export industries Lower than that of its import-competing industries Exports - less capital intensive than import-competing goods Import-competing goods - more capital intensive than U.S. exports © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

TABLE 3.6 Factor content of U.S. Trade: capital and labor requirements per million dollars of U.S. Exports and import substitutes © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Exports of the U.S. Not intensive in physical capital Intensive in human capital Skill intensive Countries with highly educated workers Exports concentrated in skill-intensive goods Countries with less educated workers Export goods that require little skilled labor © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Education, skill intensity, and U.S. import shares, 1998
FIGURE 3.4 Education, skill intensity, and U.S. import shares, 1998 The figure suggests that countries that are abundant in skilled labor capture larger shares of U.S. imports in industries that intensively use those factors. Conversely, countries that are abundant in unskilled labor capture larger shares of U.S. imports in industries that intensively use those factors. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Increasing Returns to Scale
Increasing-returns trade theory Nations with similar factor endowments Negligible comparative-advantage differences May find it beneficial to trade Because they can take advantage of massive economies of scale Produce that good in great quantity at low average unit costs Trade those low-cost goods to other nations © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Economies of scale as a basis for trade
FIGURE 3.5 Economies of scale as a basis for trade By adding to the size of the domestic market, international trade permits longer production runs by domestic firms, which can lead to greater efficiency and reductions in unit costs. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

External Economies of Scale
The average cost of the typical firm decreases As the output of the industry within this area increases Concentration of an industry’s firms in a particular geographic Larger pools of a specialized type of worker New knowledge about production technology spreads among firms in the area © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Overlapping Demands as a Basis for Trade
Theory of overlapping demands, Linder, 1960s Factor-endowment theory - explains trade in primary products and agricultural goods Not trade in manufactured goods Force influencing manufactured-good trade Domestic demand conditions Firms within a country – manufacture goods for which there is a large domestic market A nation’s exports - extension of the production for the domestic market © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Theory of overlapping demands, Linder, 1960s Consumer demand - conditioned strongly by income levels A country’s average or per capita income will yield a particular pattern of demand Nations with high per capita incomes will demand high-quality manufactured goods (luxuries) Nations with low per capita incomes will demand lower-quality goods (necessities) © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Theory of overlapping demands, Linder, 1960s Nations with similar per capita incomes Overlapping demand structures Consume similar types of manufactured goods Wealthy (industrial) nations More likely to trade with other wealthy nations Poor (developing) nations More likely to trade with other poor nations © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Intra-industry Trade Intra-industry specialization, trade
Production of particular products or groups of products within a given industry The opening up of trade does not generally result in the elimination or wholesale contraction of entire industries within a nation The range of products produced and sold by each nation changes Emphasized by advanced industrial nations © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Involves flows of goods with similar factor requirements Conducted mostly among industrial countries Similar resource endowments Firms – oligopolies Trade in homogeneous goods Transportation costs Seasonal © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Trade in differentiated products Unmet need Overlapping demand segments in trading nations Economies of scale Fewer adjustment problems © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

TABLE 3.7 Intra-industry trade examples: selected U.S. exports and imports, 2007 (in millions of dollars) © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Technology: The Product Cycle Theory
Technological innovations Different nations, at different rates of speed Result in: New methods of producing existing commodities Production of new commodities Commodity improvements Often transitory © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Product life cycle theory Predictable trade cycle: Manufactured good is introduced to home market Domestic industry shows export strength. Foreign production begins Domestic industry loses competitive advantage Import competition begins © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

International product cycle U.S. and Japanese radio manufacturers U.S. and Japanese pocket calculators manufacturers © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Industrial Policy
Comparative advantage in a particular industry Can be created Mobilization of skilled labor, technology, and capital Industrial policy Government is actively involved in creating comparative advantage Strategy to revitalize, improve, and develop an industry © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Industrial Policy
Antitrust immunity, tax incentives, R&D subsidies, loan guarantees, low-interest-rate loans, trade protection Requires government to identify the “winners” And encourage resources to move into industries with the highest growth prospects © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Government Subsidies Support Boeing and Airbus
Industrial policy Government subsidies – commercial jetliner industry World’s manufacturers of commercial jetliners Oligopolistic market Dominated by Boeing of the United States Airbus Company of Europe © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Boeing, United States “Airbus receives unfair subsidies from European governments” Allegedly: Loans for the development of new aircraft Below-market interest rates 70-90% of an aircraft’s development cost Repay the loans after it delivers an aircraft Can avoid repaying the loans in full if sales of its aircraft fall short © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Defended its subsidies Prevent U.S. from holding a worldwide monopoly in commercial jetliners “Boeing benefits from government assistance” Indirect subsidies Support aeronautics and propulsion research – government organizations © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Indirect subsidies Support for commercial jetliner innovation -military-sponsored research and military procurement Subcontracts part of the production of its jetliners to Japan and China Receive substantial governmental subsidies Tax breaks © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Government Regulatory Policies
Government regulations Workplace safety Occupational Safety and Health Administration Product safety Consumer Product Safety Commission Clean environment Environmental Protection Agency May improve the wellbeing of the public Can result in higher costs for domestic firms © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

U.S. Steelmakers complain about regulatory burdens
TABLE 3.8 U.S. Steelmakers complain about regulatory burdens Below are some examples of U.S. regulations affecting domestic steel producers: Health Care. U.S. steel companies spent more than $1.5 billion for health care in 2003 for workers, retirees, and dependents. This adversely affects the competitiveness of U.S. steel companies vis-à-vis foreign competitors, many of whose health care costs are borne by government through general tax revenues. OSHA. The complexity and cost of compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations continue to increase. Many OSHA rules do not have a sound scientific or medical basis and thus are impractical and cost ineffective. Electricity Policy. Electricity is a major component of steel-manufacturing costs, but it cannot be purchased on a competitive basis as are other commodities. Global Climate Change. Efforts by the United States to achieve a seven percent decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by the year 2012, as dictated by the Kyoto Protocol, could result in $5 billion in extra annual energy costs for U.S. steel companies. Clean Air. Proposed tighter standards for pollutants could place much of the United States—including many steel industry sites—in nonattainment areas. The result would be enormous new costs for steel, with no comparable requirements for U.S. trading partners. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Trade effects of governmental regulations
FIGURE 3.6 Trade effects of governmental regulations The imposition of government regulations (clean environment, workplace safety, product safety) on U.S. steel companies leads to higher costs and a decrease in market supply. This imposition detracts from the competitiveness of U.S. steel companies and reduces their share of the U.S. steel market. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Transportation costs Costs of moving goods
Freight charges Packing and handling expenses Insurance premiums An obstacle to trade Impede the realization of gains from trade liberalization © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Differences across countries in transport costs
Source of comparative advantage Affect the volume and composition of trade Trade effects of transportation costs The high-cost importing country Produce more, consume less, and import less The low- cost exporting country Produce less, consume more, and export less © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Free trade under increasing-cost conditions
FIGURE 3.7 Free trade under increasing-cost conditions In the absence of transportation costs, free trade results in the equalization of prices of traded goods, as well as resource prices, in the trading nations. With the introduction of transportation costs, the low cost exporting nation produces less, consumes more, and exports less; the high cost importing nation produces more, consumes less, and imports less. The degree of specialization in production between the two nations decreases as do the gains from trade. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Transportation costs Reduce the volume of trade
Reduce the degree of specialization in production Reduce the gains from trade One possible reason for international wage differential © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Falling transportation costs since 1965
Imports - more competitive in U.S. markets Higher volume of trade for U.S. Due to technological improvements Large dry-bulk containers Large scale tankers Containerization Wide-bodied jets Telecommunications © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Size of transportation costs, selected countries, 2007
TABLE 3.9 Size of transportation costs, selected countries, 2007 © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Growing international trade
Falling transportation costs Worldwide decrease in trade barriers Economic opening of nations that have traditionally been minor players © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Rising energy costs hinder trade flows
Rising sensitivity to increased energy costs Shift toward containerization Speed Transport costs © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Rising energy costs hinder trade flows
Rising shipping costs Trade should be both dampened and diverted Substitute goods - from closer locations Sizable surcharges on domestic shipments by train and truck Congested domestic transportation systems May slow the outsourcing of goods in the future © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Transportation Costs Terrorist attack Added costs
Slowdowns for U.S. freight system Security can become a new kind of trade barrier © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use

Sources of Comparative Advantage

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Sources of Comparative Advantage"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Sources of Comparative Advantage

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Sources of Comparative Advantage"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback