Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Deterministic and stochastic modeling of the end-to-end interdisciplinary system, and its errors and uncertainties.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Deterministic and stochastic modeling of the end-to-end interdisciplinary system, and its errors and uncertainties."— Presentation transcript:

1 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Deterministic and stochastic modeling of the end-to-end interdisciplinary system, and its errors and uncertainties P.F.J. Lermusiaux April 9, 2003 1.END-TO-END SYSTEMS AND COUPLED MODELS 2.UNCERTAINTIES IN END-TO-END COMPONENTS –SOURCES, FORWARD TRANSFERS, BACKWARD TRANSFERS 3.RESEARCH SUBJECTS FOR END-2-END UNCERTAINTY MODELING –TOPICS AND DIRECTIONS –ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONS AND CHALLENGES

2 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux AD: Acoustical Data MD: Meteorological Data PD: Physical Data GD: Geological Data ND: Noise Data SD: Sonar Data PMD: Physical Model Data BMD: Bottom Model Data NMD: Noise Model Data APMD: Acous. Prop. Model Data SMD: Sonar Model Data TMD: Target Model Data

3 Coupled (Dynamical) Models and Outputs BOTTOM MODELS Hamilton model, Sediment flux models (G&G), etc Statistical/stochastic models fit-to-data OUTPUTS Wave-speed, density and attenuation coefficients NOISE MODELS Wenz diagram, empirical models/rule of thumbs OUTPUTS f-dependent ambient noise (f,x,y,z,t): due to sea- surface, shipping, biologics SONAR SYS. MODELS AND SIGNAL PROCES. Sonar equations (f,t) Detection, localization, classification and tracking models and their inversions OUTPUTS SNR, SIR, SE, FOM Beamforming, spectral analyses outputs (time/frequency domains) TARGET MODELS Measured/Empirical OUTPUTS: SL, TS for active PHYSICAL MODELS Non-hydrostatic models (PDE, x,y,z,t) Primitive-Eqn. models (PDE, x,y,z,t) Quasi-geostrophic models, shallow-water Objective maps, balance eqn. (thermal-wind) Feature models OUTPUTS T, S, velocity fields and parameters, C field Dynamical balances ACOUS. PROP. MODELS Parabolic-Eqn. models (x,y,z,t/f) (Coupled)-Normal-Mode parabolic-eqn. (x,z,f) Wave number eqn. models (x,z,f: OASIS) Ray-tracing models (CASS) OUTPUTS Full-field TL (pressure p, phase  ) Modal decomposition of p field Processed series: arrival strut., travel times, etc. CW / Broadband TL REVERBERATION MODELS (active) Surface, volume and bottom scattering models OUTPUTS: scattering strengths

4 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux DEFINITION AND REPRESENTATION OF UNCERTAINTY x= estimate of some quantity (measured, predicted, calculated) x t = actual value (unknown true nature) e= x - x t (unknown error) Uncertainty in x is a representation of the error estimate e e.g. probability distribution function of e Variability in x vs. Uncertainty in x Uncertainties in general have structures, in time and in space

5 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux MAIN SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTIES IN END-TO-END COMPONENTS Physical model uncertainties –Bathymetry –Initial conditions –BCs: surface atmospheric, coastal-estuary and open-boundary fluxes –Parameterized processes: sub-grid-scales, turbulence closures, un-resolved processes e.g. tides and internal tides, internal waves and solitons, microstructure and turbulence –Numerical errors: steep topographies/pressure gradient, non-convergence Bottom/geoacoustic model uncertainties –Model structures themselves: parameterizations, variability vs. uncertainty –Measured or empirically-fit model parameters –BCs (bathymetry, bottom roughness) and initial conditions (for flux models) –3-D effects, non-linearities –Numerical errors: e.g. geological layer discretizations, interpolations

6 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Smith and Sandwell NOAA soundings combined with Smith and Sandwell (overlaid with GOM bathymetry) (predicted topography based on gravity anomaly not well compensated for regions with thick sediments) Uncertainties in bathymetry (from data differences and statistical model)

7 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Baugmarter and Anderson, JGR (1996) Uncertainties in atmospheric forcings (from buoy-data/3d-model differences)

8 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Three-Hourly Atmospheric Forcings: Adjusted Eta-29 model, 21 July 1996, 2pm EST

9 Hovmoller diagram Sample effects of sub-grid-scale internal tides: difference between non-forced and forced model Uncertainties in un-resolved processes: Stochastic forcing model of sub-grid-scale internal tides

10 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux MAIN SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTIES IN END-TO-END COMPONENTS (Continued) Acoustical model uncertainties –Sound-speed field (c) –Bathymetry, bottom geoacoustic attributes –BCs: Bottom roughness, sea-surface state –Scattering (volume, bottom, surface) –3-D effects, non-linear wave effects (non-Helmholz) –Numerical errors: e.g. c-interpolation, normal-mode at short range –Computation of broadband TL

11 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux

12 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux

13 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux MAIN SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTIES IN END-TO-END COMPONENTS (Continued) Sonar system model and signal processing uncertainties –Terms in equation: SL, TL, N, AG, DT –Sonar equations themselves: 3D effects, non-independences, multiplicative noise –Beamformer posterior uncertainties, Beamformer equations themselves Noise model uncertainties –Ambiant noise: frequencies, directions, amplitudes, types (manmade, natural) –Measured or empirically-fit model parameters (Wenz, 1962) Target model uncertainties –Source level, target strength (measured or empirically-fit model parameters) Reverberation model uncertainties (active) –Scattering models themselves: parameterizations (bottom scattering, bubbles, etc) –Measured or empirically-fit model parameters

14 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux

15 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux METHOLOGIES FOR UNCERTAINTY MODELING Representations –Random numbers –Statistical moments –Bayesian, Bayesian hierarchical, Maximum entropy methods (Erickson and Smith,1988) –Error subspace (EOFs, Polynomial Chaos, ESSE, etc) –Fuzzy uncertainties (Klir and Wierman, 1999) –Belief functions (Dempster, 1990) Evolutions/propagations/forward transfers –Deterministic/Stochastic calculus (e.g. Jazwinski, 1970) –Statistics (pdf convolutions, etc) –Information theory (Cover, 1991) –Deterministic differentials (outputs wrt inputs) Inversion methods/backward transfers –Adjoint methods, Generalized inverse, Smoothing methods (KS, ESSE)

16 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux RESEARCH SUBJECTS FOR END-2-END UNCERTAINTY MODELING Table provided for each subject: List of research topics and directions (left column) Series of illustrative research questions and challenges (right column, not intended to be comprehensive) Current and anticipated research organized in major subjects: Modeling Approaches and Methodologies End-to-End Scales and Nonlinearities Error Estimation, Error Models and Error Reductions Sensitivities, Prioritizations and Idealized Uncertainty Modeling Uncertainty Complex Systems and Fleet Operations

17 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions End-2-end models Full deterministic coupling of advanced end-2-end models to be done Separate components ok, advanced coupling starting, uncertainty modeling limited Since different components in various situations: - for bottom models, uncertainty close to variability - for parts of sonar models, dynamical models are pdfs: amplitudes, shapes of pdfs are then uncertainties careful transfer is essential! Illustrative Questions and Challenges What are essential review references on models of the end-2-end components? Is the limit in uncertainty modeling: x = x(r,t) +  x (r,t) +   (r,t) ? Etc Modeling Approaches and Methodologies

18 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions Uncertainty representation/transfer methods Deterministic, statistic and stochastic models Representations for efficient computations: sub-optimal reduction of uncertainty space to be optimal (error subspace) Evaluations and benchmarks for both idealized and realistic situations Lessons from other fields Information theory, fuzzy statistics Atmospheric/weather forecasting Illustrative Questions and Challenges What methods of representing and transferring uncertainties are in use today? What methods are most promising? Different methods for different purposes? How should methods be evaluated? What about methods that utilize the structure of end-2-end PDEs? Etc What are useful uncertainty representations? What can be learned: methods, systems? Etc Modeling Approaches and Methodologies (continued)

19 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions Multiple scales and multivariate Environmental vs. acoustical time and space scales, in 3D/2D models Measurement models linking multi- resolution data to relevant coupled models Research, real-time, operational, crisis- response Nonlinear effects Multiplicative noise and stochastic calculus Impacts of nonlinearities on forward and backward/inverse uncertainty transfers and data assimilation Predictive capabilities and ultimate predictability limits for e-2-e systems Illustrative Questions and Challenges How to best combine relocatable 2D acoustic models with 3D ocean models? How efficiently utilize internal wave data, bottom data, in 3D? Etc How nonlinear is the wave equation wrt its parameters? Should this affect uncertainty modeling? What are and how to estimate the predictability limits of sonar systems dynamics? Etc End-to-End Scales and Nonlinearities

20 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions Error models Stochastic, deterministic, adaptive (for both dynamics/data) Structural errors and parameter errors Error models for unresolved processes, forcing and boundary condition errors, environmental noise Measurement models and data uncertainties for end-2-end (physical, geological, acoustical and sonar) data bases Efficient error reductions Data assimilation methods: Control, estimation, inverse and optimization theories, and stochastic/hybrid methods Model state, model parameters and model structures estimations End-2-end adaptive sampling and model improvements Illustrative Questions and Challenges How to quantitatively prioritize uncertainties? How to differentiate between structural and parameter errors in such complex systems? How to estimate accurate stochastic forcings? How to account for and model interdisciplinary measurement errors? Etc Why should uncertainty representations and uncertainty reduction criterion be compatible? Error Estimation, Error Models and Error Reductions

21 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions Sensitivity studies Impact of same uncertainty onto different system components (e.g. bathymetry) Impact of different or variable uncertainties (amplitude, pdf shape, types) on same components? On end-2-end system? Idealized end-2-end models and systems Applied math and theoretical research for representing, characterizing, capturing and reducing (end-to-end) uncertainty for scientific and Naval purposes Truncation issues and divergence Illustrative Questions and Challenges How different are the impacts of environmental uncertainties on target detection, localization, classification and tracking? Is the broadband TL more sensitive to volume than bottom uncertainties? Etc What are the effects of simplifying assumptions? What is a parsimonious parameterization in a range dependent environment Etc Sensitivities, Prioritizations and Idealized Uncertainty Modeling

22 Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Research Topics and Directions Computations, technologies and systems Coupling of end-2-end systems components Generic versus regional systems Visualization of uncertainties (and uncertainties in visualization) Information technology, scientific distributed computing Fleet applications/operational systems Automated systems for uncertainty predictions, skill evaluations Efficient research-to-operation and operation-to-research transitions/feedbacks Research, real-time, operational, crisis- response Typical scenarios and rules of thumb Illustrative Questions and Challenges How to couple end-2-end components for efficient computing? How to benefit from Fleet experiences? How to downscale scientific descriptions to useful operational uncertainties? Can uncertainty models lead to improved and more efficient TDA, tactical advantage? How to usefully estimate accuracies/errors of an operational system? Should operator overload uncertainties be modeled? Uncertainty Complex Systems and Fleet Operations


Download ppt "Harvard UniversityP.F.J. Lermusiaux Deterministic and stochastic modeling of the end-to-end interdisciplinary system, and its errors and uncertainties."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google