Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

United States Coast Guard 1985 Evaluation of a Multi-Model Storm Surge Ensemble for the New York Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle Tom Di Liberto Stony.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "United States Coast Guard 1985 Evaluation of a Multi-Model Storm Surge Ensemble for the New York Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle Tom Di Liberto Stony."— Presentation transcript:

1 United States Coast Guard 1985 Evaluation of a Multi-Model Storm Surge Ensemble for the New York Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle Tom Di Liberto Stony Brook University

2 ADCIRC Water-level and Flooding 12-km MM5 Forecast 1200 UTC 11 December 1992 meters Colle, B. A., F. Buonaiuto, M. J. Bowman, R. E. Wilson, et al., 2008: Simulations of past cyclone events to explore New York City’s vulnerability to coastal flooding and storm surge model capabilities, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. ADCIRC Surge Forecast

3

4 Current Real-Time Systems Stony Brook Storm Surge Model Stevens Institute of Technology’s Storm Surge model (NYHOPS) NOAA Extratropical Storm Surge model http://hudson.dl.stevens-tech.edu/maritimeforecast/ http://www.nws.noaa.gov/mdl/etsurge http://stormy.msrc.sunysb.edu/

5 Real-Time Modeling Systems All three models use different ocean models and atmospheric forcing. Stony Brook Storm Surge Model (SBSS) uses 5 MM5 and 3 WRF members

6 Real-time Surge Model Grids Blumberg et al. 1999 SIT Grid SBSS Grid NOAA ET Grid

7 Motivation for Storm Surge Ensembles MM5 (GRMRF)-NAMWRF(GRYSU)-GFS 0000 UTC April 16 th, 2007 – SLP (contour), Temp (shaded) and wind WRF-GFS MM5-NAM OBS

8 Data and Methods Data: Nov. 2007 – March 2008 and Oct. 2008 – Dec. 2008 (75 in total) Deterministic: Mean Error, Root Mean Square Error Probabilistic: Rank (Talagrand) Histograms, Brier Score, Brier Skill Score and Reliability Diagrams Bias correction was applied after the first month (Nov. 2007). –Use a regression approach of storm surge observations (> 0 and < 0 m) versus the storm surge mean error. Use daily NCEP-NCAR reanalysis to look at the composite flow patterns associated with some of the errors.

9 Surge Mean Errors Bias Corr-ALL NOAA-ET ALL Bias Corr-ALL NOAA-ET SBSS SIT

10 Surface Wind Speed Biases NCEP-NAM

11 Top 10 Largest Negative Error Days - 24 Days determined from calculating the largest 24- 48 h negative mean error from the SBSS ensemble member 9a Largest negative error day is 11/04/2007 when an extratropical hurricane Noel impacted the region - 48 h- 24h Northeast winds occur 24 hours prior to large negative error Trough moves east/deepens 48 hours prior to large negative errors 0 h

12 Potential Wave Impacts Daily Averaged Significant Wave Height, m Daily Mean Error, m Significant Wave Height at buoy 44017 vs. 24-48 h Mean Error at Montauk

13 Top 10 Largest Positive Error Days Days determined from calculating the largest 24- 48 h positive mean error from the SBSS ensemble member 9a Largest negative error period was 12/23 – 12/26/2008 - 24h- 48 h Pressure gradient strengthens 24 hours prior to large negative error 0 h

14 RMSE vs Forecast Hour Bias Corr -ALL NOAA-ET SBSS ALL SIT

15 Percentage Best and Worst BEST WORST NOAA-ET SIT SBSS

16 Rank Histogram ALL ALL-BC

17 Brier Scores vs Threshold ALL-BC ALL ENS3-BC ENS3 SBSS

18 Brier Skill Score (vs SBU CTL) ALL ENS3 ENS3-BC ALL-BC SBSS

19 Reliability Diagrams SBSS ALL > 0.3 m Surge > 0.4 m Surge SBSS ALL SBSS

20 Reliability Diagram SBSS ALL ENS-3 > 0.3 m Surge > 0.4 m Surge ALL SBSS ENS3

21 Conclusions All surge models have a slight negative bias overall, which is largest in the NOAA-ET model. One can not use the last 7-14 days for bias correction, since bias depends on the sign of the surge. Stevens Institute (SIT) has greater deterministic accuracy (lower RMSEs) than all the SBSS MM5 and WRF ADCIRC members, which highlights the importance of adding different (and good) ocean models to the ensemble. The largest SBSS mean surge errors are dependent on the synoptic flow patterns. Positive surges with nor-easters are underpredicted on average, while offshore flow with an anticyclone to the west favors positive errors (underpredicted “blow-out” conditions). Most of the ensemble probabilistic skill and reliability originates from the three different ocean models on average, not from using one ocean model and multi-model atmospheric forcing (MM5 and WRF). Recommendation: In addition to coupling NOAA-ET to the SREF (NWS plans to do this soon), added skill can be obtained by also using different ocean (surge) models (ADCIRC, POM, ROMS, FVCOM, etc…).


Download ppt "United States Coast Guard 1985 Evaluation of a Multi-Model Storm Surge Ensemble for the New York Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle Tom Di Liberto Stony."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google