1. Text and Web Search

2. Text Databases and IR Text databases (document databases) Large collections of documents from various sources: news articles, research papers, books, digital libraries, e-mail messages, and Web pages, library database, etc. Information retrieval A field developed in parallel with database systems Information is organized into (a large number of) documents Information retrieval problem: locating relevant documents based on user input, such as keywords or example documents

3. Information Retrieval Typical IR systems Online library catalogs Online document management systems Information retrieval vs. database systems Some DB problems are not present in IR, e.g., update, transaction management, complex objects Some IR problems are not addressed well in DBMS, e.g., unstructured documents, approximate search using keywords and relevance

4. Basic Measures for Text Retrieval Precision: the percentage of retrieved documents that are in fact relevant to the query (i.e., “correct” responses) Recall: the percentage of documents that are relevant to the query and were, in fact, retrieved Relevant Relevant & Retrieved Retrieved All Documents

5. Information Retrieval Techniques Index Terms (Attribute) Selection: Stop list Word stem Index terms weighting methods Terms  Documents Frequency Matrices Information Retrieval Models: Boolean Model Vector Model Probabilistic Model

6. Problem - Motivation Given a database of documents, find documents containing “data”, “retrieval” Applications: Web law + patent offices digital libraries information filtering

7. Types of queries: boolean (‘data’ AND ‘retrieval’ AND NOT...) additional features (‘data’ ADJACENT ‘retrieval’) keyword queries (‘data’, ‘retrieval’) How to search a large collection of documents? Problem - Motivation

8. Full-text scanning for single term: (naive: O(N*M)) ABRACADABRAtext CAB pattern

9. for single term: (naive: O(N*M)) Knuth, Morris and Pratt (‘77) build a small FSA; visit every text letter once only, by carefully shifting more than one step ABRACADABRAtext CAB pattern Full-text scanning

10. ABRACADABRAtext CAB pattern CAB... Full-text scanning

11. for single term: (naive: O(N*M)) Knuth Morris and Pratt (‘77) Boyer and Moore (‘77) preprocess pattern; start from right to left & skip! ABRACADABRAtext CAB pattern Full-text scanning

12. Text - Detailed outline text problem full text scanning inversion signature files clustering information filtering and LSI

13. Text – Inverted Files

14. Q: space overhead? Text – Inverted Files A: mainly, the postings lists

15. how to organize dictionary? stemming – Y/N? Keep only the root of each word ex. inverted, inversion  invert insertions? Text – Inverted Files

16. how to organize dictionary? B-tree, hashing, TRIEs, PATRICIA trees,... stemming – Y/N? insertions? Text – Inverted Files

17. postings list – more Zipf distr.: eg., rank-frequency plot of ‘Bible’ log(rank) log(freq) freq ~ 1/rank / ln(1.78V) Text – Inverted Files

18. postings lists Cutting+Pedersen (keep first 4 in B-tree leaves) how to allocate space: [Faloutsos+92] geometric progression compression (Elias codes) [Zobel+] – down to 2% overhead! Conclusions: needs space overhead (2%-300%), but it is the fastest Text – Inverted Files

19. Vector Space Model and Clustering Keyword (free-text) queries (vs Boolean) each document: -> vector (HOW?) each query: -> vector search for ‘similar’ vectors

20. Vector Space Model and Clustering main idea: each document is a vector of size d: d is the number of different terms in the database document...data... aaron zoo data d (= vocabulary size) ‘indexing’

21. Document Vectors Documents are represented as “bags of words” Represented as vectors when used computationally A vector is like an array of floating points Has direction and magnitude Each vector holds a place for every term in the collection Therefore, most vectors are sparse

22. Document Vectors One location for each word. novagalaxy heath’wood filmroledietfur 10 5 3 5 10 10 8 7 9 10 5 10 10 9 10 5 7 9 6 10 2 8 7 5 1 3 ABCDEFGHIABCDEFGHI “Nova” occurs 10 times in text A “Galaxy” occurs 5 times in text A “Heat” occurs 3 times in text A (Blank means 0 occurrences.)

23. Document Vectors One location for each word. novagalaxy heath’wood filmroledietfur 10 5 3 5 10 10 8 7 9 10 5 10 10 9 10 5 7 9 6 10 2 8 7 5 1 3 ABCDEFGHIABCDEFGHI “Hollywood” occurs 7 times in text I “Film” occurs 5 times in text I “Diet” occurs 1 time in text I “Fur” occurs 3 times in text I

24. Document Vectors novagalaxy heath’wood filmroledietfur 10 5 3 5 10 10 8 7 9 10 5 10 10 9 10 5 7 9 6 10 2 8 7 5 1 3 ABCDEFGHIABCDEFGHI Document ids

25. We Can Plot the Vectors Star Diet Doc about astronomy Doc about movie stars Doc about mammal behavior

26. Vector Space Model and Clustering Then, group nearby vectors together Q1: cluster search? Q2: cluster generation? Two significant contributions ranked output relevance feedback

27. Vector Space Model and Clustering cluster search: visit the (k) closest superclusters; continue recursively CS TRs MD TRs

28. Vector Space Model and Clustering ranked output: easy! CS TRs MD TRs

29. Vector Space Model and Clustering relevance feedback (brilliant idea) [Roccio’73] CS TRs MD TRs

30. Vector Space Model and Clustering relevance feedback (brilliant idea) [Roccio’73] How? CS TRs MD TRs

31. Vector Space Model and Clustering How? A: by adding the ‘good’ vectors and subtracting the ‘bad’ ones CS TRs MD TRs

32. Cluster generation Problem: given N points in V dimensions, group them

33. Cluster generation Problem: given N points in V dimensions, group them (typically a k-means or AGNES is used)

34. Assigning Weights to Terms Binary Weights Raw term frequency tf x idf Recall the Zipf distribution Want to weight terms highly if they are frequent in relevant documents … BUT infrequent in the collection as a whole

35. Binary Weights Only the presence (1) or absence (0) of a term is included in the vector

36. Raw Term Weights The frequency of occurrence for the term in each document is included in the vector

37. Assigning Weights tf x idf measure: term frequency (tf) inverse document frequency (idf) -- a way to deal with the problems of the Zipf distribution Goal: assign a tf * idf weight to each term in each document

38. tf x idf

39. Inverse Document Frequency IDF provides high values for rare words and low values for common words For a collection of 10000 documents

40. Similarity Measures for document vectors Simple matching (coordination level match) Dice’s Coefficient Jaccard’s Coefficient Cosine Coefficient Overlap Coefficient

41. tf x idf normalization Normalize the term weights (so longer documents are not unfairly given more weight) normalize usually means force all values to fall within a certain range, usually between 0 and 1, inclusive.

42. Vector space similarity (use the weights to compare the documents)

43. Computing Similarity Scores 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.60.41.00.2

44. Vector Space with Term Weights and Cosine Matching 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.80.60.40.201.0 D2D2 D1D1 Q Term B Term A D i =(d i1,w di1 ;d i2, w di2 ;…;d it, w dit ) Q =(q i1,w qi1 ;q i2, w qi2 ;…;q it, w qit ) Q = (0.4,0.8) D1=(0.8,0.3) D2=(0.2,0.7)

45. Text - Detailed outline Text databases problem full text scanning inversion signature files (a.k.a. Bloom Filters) Vector model and clustering information filtering and LSI

46. Information Filtering + LSI [Foltz+,’92] Goal: users specify interests (= keywords) system alerts them, on suitable news- documents Major contribution: LSI = Latent Semantic Indexing latent (‘hidden’) concepts

47. Information Filtering + LSI Main idea map each document into some ‘concepts’ map each term into some ‘concepts’ ‘Concept’:~ a set of terms, with weights, e.g. “data” (0.8), “system” (0.5), “retrieval” (0.6) -> DBMS_concept

48. Information Filtering + LSI Pictorially: term-document matrix (BEFORE)

49. Information Filtering + LSI Pictorially: concept-document matrix and...

50. Information Filtering + LSI... and concept-term matrix

51. Information Filtering + LSI Q: How to search, eg., for ‘system’?

52. Information Filtering + LSI A: find the corresponding concept(s); and the corresponding documents

53. Information Filtering + LSI A: find the corresponding concept(s); and the corresponding documents

54. Information Filtering + LSI Thus it works like an (automatically constructed) thesaurus: we may retrieve documents that DON’T have the term ‘system’, but they contain almost everything else (‘data’, ‘retrieval’)

55. SVD LSI: find ‘concepts’

56. SVD - Definition A [n x m] = U [n x r]   r x r] (V [m x r] ) T A: n x m matrix (eg., n documents, m terms) U: n x r matrix (n documents, r concepts)  : r x r diagonal matrix (strength of each ‘concept’) (r : rank of the matrix) V: m x r matrix (m terms, r concepts)

57. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx

58. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx CS-concept MD-concept

59. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx CS-concept MD-concept doc-to-concept similarity matrix

60. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx ‘strength’ of CS-concept

61. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx term-to-concept similarity matrix CS-concept

62. SVD - Example A = U  V T - example: data inf. retrieval brain lung = CS MD xx term-to-concept similarity matrix CS-concept

63. SVD for LSI ‘documents’, ‘terms’ and ‘concepts’: U: document-to-concept similarity matrix V: term-to-concept sim. matrix  : its diagonal elements: ‘strength’ of each concept

64. SVD for LSI Need to keep all the eigenvectors? NO, just keep the first k (concepts)

65. Web Search What about web search? First you need to get all the documents of the web…. Crawlers. Then you have to index them (inverted files, etc) Find the web pages that are relevant to the query Report the pages with their links in a sorted order Main difference with IR: web pages have links may be possible to exploit the link structure for sorting the relevant documents…

66. Kleinberg’s Algorithm (HITS) Main idea: In many cases, when you search the web using some terms, the most relevant pages may not contain this term (or contain the term only a few times) Harvard : www.harvard.eduwww.harvard.edu Search Engines: yahoo, google, altavista Authorities and hubs

67. Kleinberg’s algorithm Problem dfn: given the web and a query find the most ‘authoritative’ web pages for this query Step 0: find all pages containing the query terms (root set) Step 1: expand by one move forward and backward (base set)

68. Kleinberg’s algorithm Step 1: expand by one move forward and backward

69. Kleinberg’s algorithm on the resulting graph, give high score (= ‘authorities’) to nodes that many important nodes point to give high importance score (‘hubs’) to nodes that point to good ‘authorities’) hubsauthorities

70. Kleinberg’s algorithm observations recursive definition! each node (say, ‘i’-th node) has both an authoritativeness score a i and a hubness score h i

71. Kleinberg’s algorithm Let E be the set of edges and A be the adjacency matrix: the (i,j) is 1 if the edge from i to j exists Let h and a be [n x 1] vectors with the ‘hubness’ and ‘authoritativiness’ scores. Then:

72. Kleinberg’s algorithm Then: a i = h k + h l + h m that is a i = Sum (h j ) over all j that (j,i) edge exists or a = A T h k l m i

73. Kleinberg’s algorithm symmetrically, for the ‘hubness’: h i = a n + a p + a q that is h i = Sum (q j ) over all j that (i,j) edge exists or h = A a p n q i

74. Kleinberg’s algorithm In conclusion, we want vectors h and a such that: h = A a a = A T h Start from a and h to all 1. Then apply the following trick: h=Aa=A(A T h)=(AA T )h =..=(AA T ) 2 h..= (AA T ) k h a = (A T A) k a

75. Kleinberg’s algorithm In short, the solutions to h = A a a = A T h are the left- and right- eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix A. Starting from random a’ and iterating, we’ll eventually converge (Q: to which of all the eigenvectors? why?)

76. Kleinberg’s algorithm (Q: to which of all the eigenvectors? why?) A: to the ones of the strongest eigenvalue, because of property : (A T A ) k v’ ~ (constant) v 1 So, we can find the a and h vectors and the page with the highest a values are reported!

77. Kleinberg’s algorithm - results Eg., for the query ‘java’: 0.328 www.gamelan.com 0.251 java.sun.com 0.190 www.digitalfocus.com (“the java developer”)

78. Kleinberg’s algorithm - discussion ‘authority’ score can be used to find ‘similar pages’ to page p closely related to ‘citation analysis’, social networs / ‘small world’ phenomena

79. google/page-rank algorithm closely related: The Web is a directed graph of connected nodes imagine a particle randomly moving along the edges (*) compute its steady-state probabilities. That gives the PageRank of each pages (the importance of this page) (*) with occasional random jumps

80. PageRank Definition Assume a page A and pages T1, T2, …, Tm that point to A. Let d is a damping factor. PR(A) the Pagerank of A. C(A) the out- degree of A. Then:

81. google/page-rank algorithm Compute the PR of each page~identical problem: given a Markov Chain, compute the steady state probabilities p1... p5 1 2 3 4 5

82. Computing PageRank Iterative procedure Also, … navigate the web by randomly follow links or with prob p jump to a random page. Let A the adjacency matrix (n x n), c i out-degree of page i Prob(A i ->A j ) = dn -1 +(1-d)c i –1 A ij A’[i,j] = Prob(A i ->A j )

83. google/page-rank algorithm Let A’ be the transition matrix (= adjacency matrix, row-normalized : sum of each row = 1) 1 2 3 4 5 =

84. google/page-rank algorithm A p = p 1 2 3 4 5 =

85. google/page-rank algorithm A p = p thus, p is the eigenvector that corresponds to the highest eigenvalue (=1, since the matrix is row-normalized)

86. Kleinberg/google - conclusions SVD helps in graph analysis: hub/authority scores: strongest left- and right- eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix random walk on a graph: steady state probabilities are given by the strongest eigenvector of the transition matrix

87. References Brin, S. and L. Page (1998). Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. 7th Intl World Wide Web Conf.