1. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 1/10 The Proposal its objectives 1.Who are we? 2.The challenge 3.The objective 4.Specific HANDS values and properties 5.Considerations 6.Work

2. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 2/10 Introductionary remarks While writing the proposal we consider 1.What we actually wants to do 2.What FP7 wants us to do and in which way Benefit of joining HANDS Network Access to new knowledge

3. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 3/10 The HANDS – Consortium Research Aalborg University, ELTE – Budapest, LSBU, London Testschools Egebakken, Ullerødskolen, Autism Foundation, HA School, SvedenSkolan Software Developers Wirtek(DK/RU), Edvantage(DK/NO)

4. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 4/10 FP7 – The objective Objective ICT-2007.7.2: Accessible and Inclusive ICT d) Targeted and exploratory ICT research on innovative communication and shared creative environments aimed at facilitating social inclusion of marginalised young people. A limited number of small scale preparatory actions should contribute to a future research agenda. Proposals addressing this area should be supported by organisations having a track- record in research on ICT and marginalised young people. HANDS – a STREP project – Specific targeted research project

5. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 5/10 A Proposal Section A – Forms ____________________ Section B Section 1(Typical 20 pages) 1.1 Concept and objectives 1.2 Progress beyond the state of the art 1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan Section 2 (Typical 7-8 pages) 2.1Management structure and procedures 2.2Individual Participants 2.3Consortium as a whole 2.4Resources to be committed Section 3 (10 pages) 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme 3.2Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property Section 4(3 pages) Ethical issues(a form) Appendix CV, Litteraturelist, Future Research Agenda

6. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 6/10 Evaluators Scoreboard includes 1.Scientific and/or technological excellence(relevant to the topics adressed by the call) 2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management 3. Potential impact through the development, dissimination and use of project results

7. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 7/10 HANDS values and properties 1.Persuasive Technology 2.Open Source 3.Usercentric design 4.Ethics is considered 5.Interdisciplinary work with the involvement of the professional practioner

8. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 8/10 Considerations 1.Collaboration between research and development 2.The role of ethics 3.My role?

9. Morten AagaardHANDS Side 9/10 The Proposal its objectives Work/timeline While writing/correcting: labels, terms and more may change! While reading: how can you contribe? PublishedDeadline WP description. WP leaders Already1. Version September 24th(leader) Final October 3th Section 1.1+1.2. All Already Jesper Thestrup reviews September 19th Impact Risk-Threat matrix Future Research Agenda Litteraturelist All. Thursday, September 20 th Jesper Thestrup reviews September 19th September 27th The Acronym - the inspired onesAlreadyOctober 1th