Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.

Published by Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons."— Presentation transcript:

1 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons to performance  simulations  vulnerabilities  IP characterization measurements Machine-Detector Interface (MDI) report Presented by M. Weaver, SLAC

2 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Run-6 radiation-abort history B. Petersen S. Curry ~ 2.8/day Jan 2007 May 2007 Sep 2007 Jul 2007 Mar 2007

3 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Forward West Forward East Backward West Backward East Abort-by-dose location HER vacuum events Jan 2007 May 2007 Sep 2007 Jul 2007 Mar 2007 Jan 2007 May 2007 Sep 2007 Jul 2007 Mar 2007

4 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Background Monitoring Summary  SVTRAD diodes + diamondsdose rates, dose / injection  DCH high voltagecurrent  DRC PMTsscaler rates  IFR high voltagecurrent  Fast Control & Timingdeadtime, L1 rates, time wrt injection  Level 3 Triggersubdetector occupancies  Neutron counters scaler rates  CsI IP detectors(logarithmic response)  All update in small intervals (1-5 seconds)

5 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Run-6 radiation-dose rates Dose rate (mrad/s) Pressure (nT) Incoming HER Vacuum BW Diamond BE Diamond Incoming LER Vacuum

6 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Injection- & trickle- background history Monitor by integrating SVTRAD diode signals over 12 ms after each injection SVT electronics are sometimes “upset” by exposures greater than 50 mrad / injection. HER injection-quality monitor LER LER injection-quality monitor Average Dose/Injection (mrad)

7 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 DIRC PMT Scaler Rate DIRC reconstruction has been shown to be robust up to 1MHz hit rate.

8 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Detector Occupancies (%) SVT Layer 1 East SVT Layer 1 West DCH Total EMC Total Tuned noise thresholds and tightened time windows

9 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Background sources in PEP-II  Beam-gas (bremsstrahlung + Coulomb)  HEB only: B Hbg ~ I H * (p H 0 + P H Dyn * I H ) Note: p 0 = f(T) !  LEB only: B Lbg ~ I L * (p L 0 + P L Dyn * I L ) Note: p 0 = f(T) !  beam-gas x- term: B LHbg ~ c LH * I L * I H (LEB+HEB, out of collision) (?)  Luminosity (radiative-Bhabha debris) – major concern as L   B P ~ d P * L (strictly linear with L)  Beam-beam tails  from LER tails: B L, bb ~ I L * f L (  L,H +/- )  from HER tails: B H, bb ~ I H * f H (  L,H +/- )  Trickle background: B Li, B Hi  Trickle background: B Li, B Hi (injected-beam quality/orbit + beam-beam)  Touschek: B LT  Touschek: B LT (signature somewhat similar to bremstrahlung; so far small) Still using characterization of Jan’04

10 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Projected DAQ Requirements/Performance Processing Time Fiber Transfer Feature Extraction Processing Time Threshold tuning and window tightening upgraded L1 Rate (Hz) Time 7.0kHz “ceiling” 5.8kHz average upgraded

11 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 SVT Integrated dose will be more than 1 Mrad/year Backward: Forward: TopEastWestBottom TopEastWestBottom NOW 20042005 20062007 Background will be 50% HER, 50% L Background strongly  - dependent Predict 80% chip occupancy right in MID-plane In layer 1, 10% will be above 20% occupancy Projected Detector Occupancies

12 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Background model comparisons (measured/model) Bwd East Dose Rate Bwd West Dose Rate Lots of vacuum work during pre- Run6 downtime resulted in a long time to scrub. HER vacuum performance still better than predictions from Jan’04 characterization. Ratio

13 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 DCH BackgroundL1 Trigger Rate Background model comparisons (measured/model) Trigger rate somewhat larger than characterization. Results in higher deadtime. Run6 backgrounds still consistent with characterization.

14 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 DRC Background Background model comparisons (measured/model) Large fluctuations but tolerable in this subdetector.

15 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Machine Background Simulations  Long effort to simulate sources of machine backgrounds to improve understanding  Added interest from future B-factory designers  Difficulty integrating tools  LER model was completed long ago and simulated with not- so-satisfactory results. Problems uncovered generating HER model. At long last, HER model is consistent among the tools. Ready to simulate and analyse.  Analysis may learn something in time to compare against machine operation but benefit is unknown. Accelerator Design (MAD) Primary Interactions (Turtle) Secondary Interactions + Detector Response (GEANT)

16 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Detector Vulnerabilities  Readout Deadtime  Inefficiencies, backgrounds (combinatorics)  Damage SVT Total DCH EMT Extrapolation (5.8kHz) x2 Background (7kHz) BaBar experts are estimating worst tolerable conditions A tightened “emergency” trigger configuration is ready, just in case…

17 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 IP Characterization  Use BaBar’s tracking resolution and prime venue for measuring important parameters at the IP  Three analyses each measuring  y,  * y  dLumi / dz vertexing e + e - and  +  - events   yLumi (z)  +  - events   y’Lumi (z)  +  - events (resolution) Production vertices (x,y,z ~ 30  m) Boost trajectories (  ~ 0.6 mrad) e- beam e+ beam

18 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 BaBar IP measurements reported online  Luminous Region  centroids { x, y, z}  sizes { x, z } every 10 minutes  tilts { dx/dz, dy/dz }  dL/dz fit {  z,  * y, z w, z c } every ~hour  Boost Trajectory  mean { x’, y’ } every 10 minutes  spread { x’ HER, y’ HER } every 30 minutes }

19 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  V RF  z (mm) Bunch Length Extraction from d L /dz Fits BaBar Run  z 2 = 10.3 mm 2 ± 0.4 mm 2 zH , 10.9 mm 10.4 mm 10.8 mm ± 0.2 mm zL , ± 0.2 mm  y * = 13mm

20 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 d L /dz IP Beta Function Measurements yLyL  y’ B PEP phase advance  2

21 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Summary (I)  Expect a painful scrubbing process at the beginning of Run7. Lots of HER arc vacuum work done to remedy source of abort-inducing vacuum events.  Injection backgrounds sometimes problematic but generally under-control  Stored-beam bgds (dose rate, data quality, dead time)  Some differences from run5 but similar magnitude.  No new thermal outgassing/vacuum activity near the detector.  Background characterization  No new experiments. Too late in the game to repeat, no time for hardware interventions.  Latest measures of the projected backgrounds still look good.  Uncertain about beam-beam backgrounds – Run5 experiment suggested not so large, Run6 experience somewhat different.

22 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Summary (II)  Simulation  After a long struggle, ready to analyze HER backgrounds.  BaBar-based IP characterization  Incorporating effects of coupling  Working on including X-ray and SL beam profile monitors

23 M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07 Spare Slides

Download ppt "M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons."

Similar presentations

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Future Dataflow Bottlenecks Christopher O’Grady with A. Perazzo and M. Weaver Babar Dataflow Group.

Future Dataflow Bottlenecks Christopher O’Grady with A. Perazzo and M. Weaver Babar Dataflow Group.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.

June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
Snowmass 14-7-01G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.

Snowmass G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +

W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC Review, 9-11 Oct 03 Machine-Detector Interface  Issues  Machine Backgrounds, Present & Future  BaBar involvement in Accelerator.

W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC Review, 9-11 Oct 03 Machine-Detector Interface  Issues  Machine Backgrounds, Present & Future  BaBar involvement in Accelerator.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.

PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.

W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background.

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.

February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan. 18-20, 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.

1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas.

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.

June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.

Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
The Belle SVD Trigger  Tom Ziegler  Vertex 2002  Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 4-8 th nov 2002 1 The Belle SVD Trigger Tom Ziegler on behalf of the Belle SVD.

The Belle SVD Trigger  Tom Ziegler  Vertex 2002  Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 4-8 th nov The Belle SVD Trigger Tom Ziegler on behalf of the Belle SVD.
MDI meeting, Nov14 2003 1 First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.

MDI meeting, Nov First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
PEPII MAC Meeting, 14 Dec 04 Luminous Region Measurements with BaBar  Real-time Measurements  x,y,z centroids, RMS widths, x-z tilt  Offline Measurements.

PEPII MAC Meeting, 14 Dec 04 Luminous Region Measurements with BaBar  Real-time Measurements  x,y,z centroids, RMS widths, x-z tilt  Offline Measurements.
CESR Beam-Beam Effects at CESR Mark A. Palmer Cornell University July 14, 2001.

CESR Beam-Beam Effects at CESR Mark A. Palmer Cornell University July 14, 2001.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google