Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1) Horn-on selection (L010185) Tightening the NuBarPID cut NuBarPID Purity vs. Efficiency nu nubar.

Published by Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1) Horn-on selection (L010185) Tightening the NuBarPID cut NuBarPID Purity vs. Efficiency nu nubar."— Presentation transcript:

1 1) Horn-on selection (L010185) Tightening the NuBarPID cut NuBarPID Purity vs. Efficiency nu nubar

2 Cut at 0.75: Eff: 49.22% Pur: 99.65% Cut at 0.80: Eff: 47.21% Pur: 99.71% Cut at 0.85: Eff: 45.25% Pur: 99.75%

3 Spectrum of antineutrino like events after cuts for MC: ~3.0e19 POT (almost all horn-on MC) Same but in log scale No events in 2 nd bin with 0.85 cut ~3.0e19 POT (almost all horn-on MC) 0.75 cut 0.80 cut 0.85 cut

4 2) Horn-off selection (L010000) Tightening the NuBarPID cut  Easier to separate neutrinos/antineutrinos in horn-off configuration NuBarPID Purity vs. Efficiency Note: The pdfs used to make the selection are the same as used in (and obtained from) the horn-on MC. nu nubar

5 Cut at 0.85: Eff: 46.97% Pur: 99.88% Cut at 0.80: Eff: 49.00% Pur: 99.87% Cut at 0.75: Eff: 50.96% Pur: 99.85%

6 Spectrum of antineutrino like events after cuts for DATA and MC: 2.77e18 POT (all horn-off data) 0.75 cut 0.80 cut 0.85 cut 1.32e19 POT (almost all horn-off MC)

Download ppt "1) Horn-on selection (L010185) Tightening the NuBarPID cut NuBarPID Purity vs. Efficiency nu nubar."

Similar presentations

Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.

Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.
% eff = (Wout / W in) *100 eff = (80 J / 100 J) * 100 = 80% W in = 75 N * 5 m = 375 J W out = 100 N * 3 m = 300 J eff = (300 J / 375 J) *100 = 80% W in.

% eff = (Wout / W in) *100 eff = (80 J / 100 J) * 100 = 80% W in = 75 N * 5 m = 375 J W out = 100 N * 3 m = 300 J eff = (300 J / 375 J) *100 = 80% W in.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.

Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February 22 2005.

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
1 A preliminary estimate of the beam e ’s from antineutrinos David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 7 th 2006.

1 A preliminary estimate of the beam e ’s from antineutrinos David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 7 th 2006.
CC analysis progress This talk: –A first attempt at calculating CC energy sensitivity using the Far Mock data MC files with full reconstruction. –Quite.

CC analysis progress This talk: –A first attempt at calculating CC energy sensitivity using the Far Mock data MC files with full reconstruction. –Quite.
Beam e background with antineutrinos Lots of discussion recently; does not look like getting needed amount of pME running will happen (or not easily at.

Beam e background with antineutrinos Lots of discussion recently; does not look like getting needed amount of pME running will happen (or not easily at.
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa March 13 th 2007  Introduction  Antineutrino selection  Feasibility.

1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa March 13 th 2007  Introduction  Antineutrino selection  Feasibility.
Selection: i) Used “basic cuts” described in my NuBarPID talk (slide 3). 74.4% of CC events pass this cut. ii) Used David’s PID cut at -0.2 to remove NC.

Selection: i) Used “basic cuts” described in my NuBarPID talk (slide 3). 74.4% of CC events pass this cut. ii) Used David’s PID cut at -0.2 to remove NC.
MINOS Feb 28 20061 Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.

MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa April 12 th 2007  Reminder  Systematic from background  Horn.

1 Using the pHE data to measure the beam e ’s from  + decay David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa April 12 th 2007  Reminder  Systematic from background  Horn.
Blessed Plots 2005 The current set of Blessed plots available from the MINOS website are taken from the 5 year plan exercise that occurred in mid-2003.

Blessed Plots 2005 The current set of Blessed plots available from the MINOS website are taken from the 5 year plan exercise that occurred in mid-2003.
Nubar-PID Nubar-PID distribution for data and MC after: 1) fiducial 2) track quality 3) fit significance data MC data/MC Horn-off.

Nubar-PID Nubar-PID distribution for data and MC after: 1) fiducial 2) track quality 3) fit significance data MC data/MC Horn-off.
Summary of Results data-Fit/Scaled MC, E < E cut (candidates for  + decay) data-Fit/Scaled MC, E > E cut raw MC375.8±15.1(stat)79.5±9.2(stat) reweighed.

Summary of Results data-Fit/Scaled MC, E < E cut (candidates for  + decay) data-Fit/Scaled MC, E > E cut raw MC375.8±15.1(stat)79.5±9.2(stat) reweighed.
Update on NC/CC separation At the previous phone meeting I presented a method to separate NC/CC using simple cuts on reconstructed quantities available.

Update on NC/CC separation At the previous phone meeting I presented a method to separate NC/CC using simple cuts on reconstructed quantities available.
 K K L  +.  + component, ME  + component, LE Difference.

 K K L  +.  + component, ME  + component, LE Difference.
(q/p) / (σ q/p) 0 < Planes < 3030

(q/p) / (σ q/p) 0 < Planes < 3030
1 Scaling methods Main idea of scaling methods is: Overall method: C(E) is obtained in 5 different ways: From horn-off data, E cut < E < E high From horn-off.

1 Scaling methods Main idea of scaling methods is: Overall method: C(E) is obtained in 5 different ways: From horn-off data, E cut < E < E high From horn-off.
25 April 20061 Antineutrino selection for constraining the e beam Goal: extract component of  rate from  + decays Requirement: High purity at low neutrino.

25 April Antineutrino selection for constraining the e beam Goal: extract component of  rate from  + decays Requirement: High purity at low neutrino.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google